切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 359 -362. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2023.05.017

论著

超声内镜与磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值
许灿, 周鹏哲, 朱宁, 穆维娜()   
  1. 071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院医务处
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院消化科
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院心内科
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-02 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 穆维娜

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct sludge-like stones

Can Xu, Pengzhe Zhou, Ning Zhu, Weina Mu()   

  1. Department of Medical, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Gastroenterology, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Cardiology, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Ultrasound, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2023-07-02 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Weina Mu
引用本文:

许灿, 周鹏哲, 朱宁, 穆维娜. 超声内镜与磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 359-362.

Can Xu, Pengzhe Zhou, Ning Zhu, Weina Mu. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct sludge-like stones[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(05): 359-362.

目的

本研究旨在探讨超声内镜(EUS)与磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在胆总管泥沙样结石诊断中的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年4月至2023年4月于保定市第一中心医院住院治疗的疑似胆总管泥沙样结石患者192例,经纳入与排除标准筛选,最终纳入182例患者作为研究对象。所有患者首先进行MRCP检查,若MRCP结果提示泥沙样结石则直接行内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查,其余患者依次行EUS和ERCP。以ERCP造影联合乳头括约肌切开取石(EST)作为诊断胆总管泥沙样结石的金标准,将各项检查结果与取石结果进行比较。

结果

EUS、MRCP和EUS联合MRCP检出胆总管泥沙样结石的阳性率分别为81.76%、65.38%和86.49%;在经ERCP下EST所证实的阳性结果中,EUS检出胆总管泥沙样结石的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为93.08%、83.33%和91.89%;MRCP为72.56%、77.78%和73.08%;EUS联合MRCP为98.46%、88.89%和97.30%。

结论

EUS和MRCP在胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断中都具有一定潜力,但EUS在准确性方面更具优势。EUS联合MRCP可能是提高胆总管泥沙样结石诊断准确率的有效策略。

Objective

To explore the value of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)in the diagnosis of common bile duct sludge-like stones.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients with suspected sludge-like choledocholithiasis who were hospitalized in the First Central Hospital of Baoding from April 2020 to April 2023.After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 182 patients were ultimately selected for the study.All patients first underwent MRCP examination.If MRCP results indicated sludge-like stones, they immediately underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). The remaining patients sequentially underwent EUS and then ERCP.ERCP radiography combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)for stone extraction was considered the gold standard for diagnosing sludge-like choledocholithiasis, and the results from various examinations were compared with the stone extraction results.

Results

The positive detection rates of EUS, MRCP, and the combination of EUS and MRCP for sludge-like choledocholithiasis were 81.76%, 65.38%, and 86.49%, respectively.Among the positive results confirmed by ERCP with EST, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS in detecting sludge-like choledocholithiasis were 93.08%, 83.33%, and 91.89%, respectively.For MRCP, these values were 72.56%, 77.78%, and 73.08%.For the combination of EUS and MRCP, the values were 98.46%, 88.89%, and 97.30%.

Conclusion

Both EUS and MRCP show potential in diagnosing sludge-like choledocholithiasis, with EUS displaying a superior accuracy advantage.Combining EUS with MRCP may be an effective strategy to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of common bile duct sludge-like stones.

图1 胆总管泥沙样结石的代表性图像注:1A内镜逆行胰胆管造影显示胆总管结石;1B超声内镜显示泥沙样结石;1C磁共振胰胆管成像显示胆总管扩张及结石
表1 EUS、MRCP、EUS联合MRCP的检查结果对比[例(%)]
表2 EUS、MRCP、EUS联合MRCP的诊断准确性对比(%)
1
Li YTan WHWu JC,et al.Microbiologic risk factors of recurrent choledocholithiasis post-endoscopic sphincterotomy[J].World J Gastroenterol202228(12):1257-1271.
2
Zhang WGChai NLZhang B,et al.Cholangioscopy-assisted extraction through novel papillary support for small-calibre and sediment-like common bile duct stones[J].World J Gastroenterol202329(16):2495-2501.
3
周敬强,刘双,李志鹏,等.胆总管结石的微创治疗[J/OL].中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)202111(6):241-243.
4
Pereira REslick GCox M.Endoscopic Ultrasound for Routine Assessment in Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis[J].J Gastrointest Surg201923(8):1694-1700.
5
刘静静,张勇,汪卫建,等.灰度直方图在胆总管"泥沙样"结石常规MRI及MRCP阴性诊断中的价值[J].临床放射学杂志201938(9):1663-1666.
6
王雪彩,张启芳,李晓燕,等.超声内镜对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志202339(2):370-375.
7
刘静静,吕帅,黄梦月,等.常规MRI、DWI及MRCP在胆总管泥沙样结石诊断中的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志202140(11):2144-2147.
8
Lesmana CRAParamitha MSLesmana LA.Innovation of endoscopic management in difficult common bile duct stone in the era of laparoscopic surgery[J].World J Gastrointest Endosc202113(7):198-209.
9
曾茹娇.EUS对胆总管结石ERCP术后患者结石复发率的价值[D].福州:福建医科大学,2022.
10
黄丽静.MRCP与CT扫描在胆道系统结石诊断中的比较分析[J].现代医用影像学202029(12):2227-2230.
11
Lin HZhou XZhang Z.The Diagnostic Value of GGT-Based Biochemical Indicators for Choledocholithiasis with Negative Imaging Results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography[J].Contrast Media Mol Imaging20222022:7737610.
12
冒忠华.CT与MRCP在胆道系统结石诊断中的应用价值分析[J].影像技术202234(4):15-19.
13
Yang ZHong JZhu L,et al.The clinical effect of a strategy called transcystic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for cholecystolithiasis:A retrospective study from a single center[J].Front Surg20239:1021395.
14
Niu HLiu FTian YB.Clinical observation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or common bile duct lithotripsy[J].World J Clin Cases202210(30):10931-10938.
15
Cianci PRestini E.Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis:Endoscopic and surgical approaches[J].World J Gastroenterol202127(28):4536-4554.
16
Lujian PXianneng CLei Z.Risk factors of stone recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones[J].Medicine(Baltimore)202099(27):e20412.
17
徐张巍,梅俏,洪江龙,等.超声内镜联合ALP、GGT在诊断胆总管结石自发排石中的应用研究[J].肝胆外科杂志202331(2):106-110.
18
Hashimoto SNakaoka KKawabe N,et al.The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions[J].Diagnostics(Basel)202111(10):1789.
19
王雪彩,张启芳.胆系泥沙样结石的诊治进展[J].临床肝胆病杂志202036(10):2386-2390.
20
Mesihović RMehmedović A.Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure:endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? [J].Med Glas(Zenica)201916(1):40-44.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[4] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[5] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[6] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[7] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[8] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[9] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[10] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[11] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[12] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要