切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 359 -362. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2023.05.017

论著

超声内镜与磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值
许灿, 周鹏哲, 朱宁, 穆维娜()   
  1. 071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院医务处
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院消化科
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院心内科
    071000 河北省,保定市第一中心医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-02 出版日期:2023-10-01
  • 通信作者: 穆维娜

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct sludge-like stones

Can Xu, Pengzhe Zhou, Ning Zhu, Weina Mu()   

  1. Department of Medical, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Gastroenterology, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Cardiology, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
    Department of Ultrasound, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Baoding 071000, China
  • Received:2023-07-02 Published:2023-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Weina Mu
引用本文:

许灿, 周鹏哲, 朱宁, 穆维娜. 超声内镜与磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 359-362.

Can Xu, Pengzhe Zhou, Ning Zhu, Weina Mu. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct sludge-like stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(05): 359-362.

目的

本研究旨在探讨超声内镜(EUS)与磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在胆总管泥沙样结石诊断中的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年4月至2023年4月于保定市第一中心医院住院治疗的疑似胆总管泥沙样结石患者192例,经纳入与排除标准筛选,最终纳入182例患者作为研究对象。所有患者首先进行MRCP检查,若MRCP结果提示泥沙样结石则直接行内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)检查,其余患者依次行EUS和ERCP。以ERCP造影联合乳头括约肌切开取石(EST)作为诊断胆总管泥沙样结石的金标准,将各项检查结果与取石结果进行比较。

结果

EUS、MRCP和EUS联合MRCP检出胆总管泥沙样结石的阳性率分别为81.76%、65.38%和86.49%;在经ERCP下EST所证实的阳性结果中,EUS检出胆总管泥沙样结石的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为93.08%、83.33%和91.89%;MRCP为72.56%、77.78%和73.08%;EUS联合MRCP为98.46%、88.89%和97.30%。

结论

EUS和MRCP在胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断中都具有一定潜力,但EUS在准确性方面更具优势。EUS联合MRCP可能是提高胆总管泥沙样结石诊断准确率的有效策略。

Objective

To explore the value of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)in the diagnosis of common bile duct sludge-like stones.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients with suspected sludge-like choledocholithiasis who were hospitalized in the First Central Hospital of Baoding from April 2020 to April 2023.After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 182 patients were ultimately selected for the study.All patients first underwent MRCP examination.If MRCP results indicated sludge-like stones, they immediately underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). The remaining patients sequentially underwent EUS and then ERCP.ERCP radiography combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)for stone extraction was considered the gold standard for diagnosing sludge-like choledocholithiasis, and the results from various examinations were compared with the stone extraction results.

Results

The positive detection rates of EUS, MRCP, and the combination of EUS and MRCP for sludge-like choledocholithiasis were 81.76%, 65.38%, and 86.49%, respectively.Among the positive results confirmed by ERCP with EST, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS in detecting sludge-like choledocholithiasis were 93.08%, 83.33%, and 91.89%, respectively.For MRCP, these values were 72.56%, 77.78%, and 73.08%.For the combination of EUS and MRCP, the values were 98.46%, 88.89%, and 97.30%.

Conclusion

Both EUS and MRCP show potential in diagnosing sludge-like choledocholithiasis, with EUS displaying a superior accuracy advantage.Combining EUS with MRCP may be an effective strategy to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of common bile duct sludge-like stones.

图1 胆总管泥沙样结石的代表性图像注:1A内镜逆行胰胆管造影显示胆总管结石;1B超声内镜显示泥沙样结石;1C磁共振胰胆管成像显示胆总管扩张及结石
表1 EUS、MRCP、EUS联合MRCP的检查结果对比[例(%)]
表2 EUS、MRCP、EUS联合MRCP的诊断准确性对比(%)
1
Li YTan WHWu JC,et al.Microbiologic risk factors of recurrent choledocholithiasis post-endoscopic sphincterotomy[J].World J Gastroenterol202228(12):1257-1271.
2
Zhang WGChai NLZhang B,et al.Cholangioscopy-assisted extraction through novel papillary support for small-calibre and sediment-like common bile duct stones[J].World J Gastroenterol202329(16):2495-2501.
3
周敬强,刘双,李志鹏,等.胆总管结石的微创治疗[J/OL].中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)202111(6):241-243.
4
Pereira REslick GCox M.Endoscopic Ultrasound for Routine Assessment in Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis[J].J Gastrointest Surg201923(8):1694-1700.
5
刘静静,张勇,汪卫建,等.灰度直方图在胆总管"泥沙样"结石常规MRI及MRCP阴性诊断中的价值[J].临床放射学杂志201938(9):1663-1666.
6
王雪彩,张启芳,李晓燕,等.超声内镜对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志202339(2):370-375.
7
刘静静,吕帅,黄梦月,等.常规MRI、DWI及MRCP在胆总管泥沙样结石诊断中的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志202140(11):2144-2147.
8
Lesmana CRAParamitha MSLesmana LA.Innovation of endoscopic management in difficult common bile duct stone in the era of laparoscopic surgery[J].World J Gastrointest Endosc202113(7):198-209.
9
曾茹娇.EUS对胆总管结石ERCP术后患者结石复发率的价值[D].福州:福建医科大学,2022.
10
黄丽静.MRCP与CT扫描在胆道系统结石诊断中的比较分析[J].现代医用影像学202029(12):2227-2230.
11
Lin HZhou XZhang Z.The Diagnostic Value of GGT-Based Biochemical Indicators for Choledocholithiasis with Negative Imaging Results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography[J].Contrast Media Mol Imaging20222022:7737610.
12
冒忠华.CT与MRCP在胆道系统结石诊断中的应用价值分析[J].影像技术202234(4):15-19.
13
Yang ZHong JZhu L,et al.The clinical effect of a strategy called transcystic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for cholecystolithiasis:A retrospective study from a single center[J].Front Surg20239:1021395.
14
Niu HLiu FTian YB.Clinical observation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or common bile duct lithotripsy[J].World J Clin Cases202210(30):10931-10938.
15
Cianci PRestini E.Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis:Endoscopic and surgical approaches[J].World J Gastroenterol202127(28):4536-4554.
16
Lujian PXianneng CLei Z.Risk factors of stone recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones[J].Medicine(Baltimore)202099(27):e20412.
17
徐张巍,梅俏,洪江龙,等.超声内镜联合ALP、GGT在诊断胆总管结石自发排石中的应用研究[J].肝胆外科杂志202331(2):106-110.
18
Hashimoto SNakaoka KKawabe N,et al.The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions[J].Diagnostics(Basel)202111(10):1789.
19
王雪彩,张启芳.胆系泥沙样结石的诊治进展[J].临床肝胆病杂志202036(10):2386-2390.
20
Mesihović RMehmedović A.Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure:endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? [J].Med Glas(Zenica)201916(1):40-44.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会. 肝细胞癌伴微血管侵犯诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 313-324.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[6] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[7] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要