切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 121 -127. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2024.02.004

论著

不同亚型上消化道克罗恩病的临床特点和预后差异研究
陈憩1, 顾于蓓2,()   
  1. 1. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院放射科
    2. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-12 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 顾于蓓
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项基金(202040110); 广慈创新技术启航计划(GCQH-2023-08)

Clinical features and prognosis in different subtypes of upper gastrointestinal Crohn's disease patients

Qi Chen1, Yubei Gu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2023-10-12 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yubei Gu
引用本文:

陈憩, 顾于蓓. 不同亚型上消化道克罗恩病的临床特点和预后差异研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 121-127.

Qi Chen, Yubei Gu. Clinical features and prognosis in different subtypes of upper gastrointestinal Crohn's disease patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(02): 121-127.

目的

探究不同亚型上消化道克罗恩病(CD)患者的临床特点和预后差异。

方法

连续性纳入2017—2021年上海瑞金医院初诊CD患者,结合内镜与病理结果将患者分为上消化道累及组(UGI+组)和非上消化道累及组(UGI-组)。分析CD患者上消化道累及率、UGI+组内镜下特点及严重程度;采用Kaplan-Meier方法描绘生存曲线,分析UGI+组与UGI-组3年持续无手术率与无并发症率差异性。并进一步将UGI+组患者按是否十二指肠球部受累进行分组,比较不同亚型间预后的差异性。

结果

76例患者纳入研究,在上消化道内镜检查中发现46例(60.5%)患者存在68处阳性内镜表现。内镜特点多样,其中胃底竹节样外观是发生率最高的上消化道内镜表现形式(20.6%),其次依次为十二指肠球部溃疡(17.6%)和十二指肠球部结节样增生(14.7%)。随访后得出UGI+组与UGI-组在3年持续无手术率和无并发症率间无明显差异(P>0.05)。进一步分组分析发现:UGI-组、CD上消化道累及非十二指肠球部组(UGI+DB-组)与CD上消化道累及十二指肠球部组(UGI+DB+组)的3年持续无事件率分别为88.9%、87.9%、68.0%。其中UGI+DB+组的3年无事件率显著低于UGI-组和UGI+DB-组(P<0.05)。

结论

初诊CD患者上消化道累及现象并非少见,其内镜下表现形式多样。提倡初诊CD患者无论有无上消化道症状均进行胃镜检查。当患者累及部位为十二指肠球部则在随访中表现为明显的手术率或并发症率增高,对于该部分患者应尽早给予积极治疗,以期改善预后。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis in different subtypes of upper gastrointestinal Crohn's disease (CD) patients.

Methods

CD patients treated at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from 2017 to 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into the upper gastrointestinal tract involvement (UGI+) group and non-upper gastrointestinal tract involvement (UGI-) group based on endoscopic and pathological findings. The upper gastrointestinal tract involvement rate of CD patients, the endoscopic characteristics and severity of UGI+ group were analyzed. Kaplan Meier method was used to survival curve, and the differences of 3-year continuous operation-free rate and complication free rate between UGI+ and UGI- group were analyzed. Patients in the UGI+ group were further divided according to whether duodenal bulb was involved, and the difference of prognosis among different subtypes was compared.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included in this study, among which 46 cases had 68 positive endoscopic findings. Endoscopic features were diverse and the bamboo joint-like appearance of the gastric fundus had the highest incidence (20.6%), followed by duodenal ulcers (17.6%) and protruding lesions of the duodenal bulb (14.7%). After follow-up, there was no significant difference between the UGI+ group and the UGI- group in the 3-year continuous operation-free rate (P>0.05). Further subgroup analysis showed that the 3-year event-free rate in the UGI- group, CD upper digestive tract involving non-duodenal bulb group (UGI+DB- group) and CD upper digestive tract involving duodenal bulb group (UGI+DB+ group) were 88.9%, 87.9% and 68.0%, respectively. The 3-year event-free rate of the UGI+DB+ group was significantly lower than that in the UGI- group and UGI+DB- group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Upper gastrointestinal involvement is not uncommon in newly diagnosed CD patients, and its endoscopic manifestations are varied. Endoscopy should be recommended to newly diagnosed CD patients regardless of asymptomatic gastrointestinal symptoms. UGI+ patients with duodenal bulb involvement have significantly higher rates of surgery or complications. Therefore, active treatment should be promptly provided to this subgroup of patients to improve their prognosis.

图1 研究流程图
表1 克罗恩病患者一般情况和临床特点(例)
图2 上消化道克罗恩病内镜表现注:2A食管中段可见阿弗他溃疡;2B胃窦线状溃疡;2C幽门处深大溃疡;2D胃窦结节样增生;2E十二指肠球部结节样增生;2F十二指肠球部结节样增生导致肠腔狭窄;2G胃底可见竹节样。
表2 上消化道克罗恩病内镜特点(例)
图3 Kaplan-Meier曲线图
[1]
Nuij VJ, Zelinkova Z, Rijk MC, et al. Phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease at diagnosis in the Netherlands: a population-based inception cohort study(the Delta Cohort)[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2013, 19(10): 2215-2222.
[2]
Graca-Pakulska K, Błogowski W, Zawada I, et al. Endoscopic findings in the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with Crohn's disease are common, highly specific, and associated with chronic gastritis[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 703.
[3]
Mehta K, Kurtz MT. Upper Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Crohn's Disease: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of an Uncommon Presentation of Crohn's Disease[J]. Mil Med, 2021, 11: usab517.
[4]
Crocco S, Martelossi S, Giurici N, et al. Upper gastrointestinal involvement in paediatric onset Crohn's disease: Prevalence and clinical implications[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2012, 6(1): 51-55.
[5]
Nomura Y, Moriichi K, Fujiya M, et al. The endoscopic findings of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with Crohn’s disease[J]. Clin J Gastroenterol, 2017, 10(4): 289-296.
[6]
Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, ECCO. 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn's Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2017, 11(1): 3-25.
[7]
Chin YH, Ng CH, Lin SY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tract Crohn's disease[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2021, 53(12): 1548-1558.
[8]
Sakuraba A, Iwao Y, Matsuoka K, et al. Endoscopic and pathologic changes of the upper gastrointestinal tract in Crohn's disease[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014(3): 610767.
[9]
Ledder O, Church P, Cytter-Kuint R, et al. A Simple Endoscopic Score Modified for the Upper Gastrointestinal tract in Crohn's Disease(UGI-SES-CD): a report from the ImageKids study[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2018, 12(9): 1073-1078.
[10]
Greuter T, Piller A, Fournier N, et al. Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Involvement in Crohn's Disease: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Disease Course[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2018, 12(12): 1399-1409.
[11]
Orrell M, van 't Hullenaar C, Gosling J. Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement in Crohn's disease: A case report[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2021, 81: 105810.
[12]
Mark L, Chengrui H, Alain B, et al. Relationship between proximal Crohn's disease location and disease behavior and surgery: a cross-sectional study of the IBD Genetics Consortium[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108(1): 106-112.
[13]
Kővári B, Pai RK. Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Histologic Clues and Pitfalls[J]. Adv Anat Pathol, 2022, 29(1): 2-14.
[14]
Diaz L, Hernandez-Oquet RE, Deshpande AR, et al. Upper Gastrointestinal Involvement in Crohn Disease: Histopathologic and Endoscopic Findings[J]. South Med J, 2015, 108(11): 695-700.
[15]
Horjus Talabur Horje CS, Meijer J, Rovers L, et al. Prevalence of Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions at Primary Diagnosis in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2016, 22(8): 1896-901.
[16]
Chow DKL, Sung JJY, Wu JCY, et al. Upper gastrointestinal tract phenotype of Crohn's disease is associated with early surgery and further hospitalization[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2010, 15(4): 551-557.
[17]
Tanabe H, Yokota K, Nomura Y, et al. The clinical importance of "bamboo joint-like appearance" on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the diagnosis of Crohn's disease[J]. Jap J Gastroenterol 2016, 113(7): 1208.
[18]
Kim ES, Kim MJ. Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement of Crohn disease: clinical implications in children and adolescents[J]. Clin Exp Pediatr, 2022, 65(1): 21-28.
[19]
Maida M, Macaluso FS, Orlando A. Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement in Crohn's disease: A relevant yet underestimated problem[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2021, 53(12): 1546-1547.
[1] 王晓梅, 刘冰, 马丽琼, 卢祖静, 苗建军. 基于LASSO-Cox回归分析的非轻症急性胰腺炎死亡风险列线图预测模型的建立和临床应用效果分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 44-50.
[2] 刘政宏, 王凤力, 吉亚君, 高佳. 胃癌中ELK3蛋白的表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 155-159.
[3] 张琳, 李婷. CRIP1在胃癌中的表达及与临床病理指标和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 171-175.
[4] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 朱显钟, 李金雨, 于忠英, 温路生. 淋巴结平均直径与无淋巴结转移肾癌病理特征及预后关系研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 146-151.
[8] 宋玮, 黄修丽, 李鑫, 史雅琼, 张晔, 邓飞, 高燕. 改良衰弱指数对重症肺部感染的预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 119-122.
[9] 王礼光, 严庆, 廖珊, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯及手术切缘对肝细胞癌患者术后生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 151-157.
[10] 马振威, 朱博, 刘赋斌, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 血小板和淋巴细胞比值联合CA19-9在胆囊癌术后患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 163-168.
[11] 夏辉, 戴斌, 冉君, 王威, 龚昭, 周程. DEP结构域蛋白1B在肝细胞癌中的表达及功能[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 205-213.
[12] 陈显育, 曾谣, 莫钊鸿, 翟航, 张广权, 钟造茂, 陈署贤. 生物信息学分析CETP基因在肝癌中表达及其对预后和免疫的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 214-219.
[13] 胡欣芫, 杨智義, 赵成俊, 张秋雨, 张挽乾, 潘佰猛, 张灵强. 急性胰腺炎评分系统预测病情严重程度的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 239-243.
[14] 谢鸿, 李娜, 李尚日, 谢涛. 肠道菌群特征对结肠癌化学治疗疗效的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 53-56.
[15] 黄志宁, 王高祥, 崔世军, 柳常青, 孙效辉, 徐美青, 解明然. 术前纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值对可切除食管鳞癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 23-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要