切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 432 -436. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2024.05.010

论著

改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究
丛黎1,(), 马林1, 陈旭1, 李文文1, 张亮亮1, 周华亭1   
  1. 1. 264200 山东省,威海市中医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-17 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 丛黎

MCTSI and detection of serum inflammatory factors in the prediction of pancreatic infection and prognosis evaluation of severe acute pancreatitis

Li Cong1,(), Lin Ma1, Xu Chen1, Wenwen Li1, Liangliang Zhang1, Huating Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Weihai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Weihai 264200, China
  • Received:2024-01-17 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Li Cong
引用本文:

丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.

Li Cong, Lin Ma, Xu Chen, Wenwen Li, Liangliang Zhang, Huating Zhou. MCTSI and detection of serum inflammatory factors in the prediction of pancreatic infection and prognosis evaluation of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.

目的

探讨改良CT严重指数(MCTSI)联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的应用价值。

方法

选取威海市中医院2020年5月至2022年12月110例SAP患者,以患者入组时间为起点,观察28 d,依据患者胰腺感染继发情况分为感染组(n=21)和未感染组(n=89);并依据患者预后生存或死亡情况将患者分为生存组(n=93)和死亡组(n=17)。所有患者均于入院后第1天行增强CT检查与血清炎症细胞学检测,通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估MCTSI评分与血清炎症指标白介素(IL-6、IL-8、IL-10)联合对患者继发胰腺感染及预后的预测价值。

结果

感染组血清IL-6、IL-8水平高于未感染组,IL-10低于未感染组(P<0.05);感染组与未感染组入院时MCTSI评分无差异(P>0.05);SAP患者IL-6、IL-8、IL-10联合检测预测胰腺感染的发生,ROC曲线下面积0.850,大于各项指标单独检测曲线下面积0.750、0.736、0.728(P<0.05);死亡组入院时IL-6、IL-8水平低于生存组,IL-10高于生存组(P<0.05);死亡组入院时MCTSI评分高于生存组(P<0.05);MCTSI评分联合血清炎性指标预测SAP患者预后ROC曲线下面积0.872,大于IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、MCTSI评分各项指标单独检测下曲线面积0.687、0.685、0.667、0.773(P<0.05)。

结论

血清IL-6、IL-8升高、IL-10降低可作为SAP患者胰腺感染的敏感指标;MCTSI评分虽不能有效预测胰腺感染,但与血清炎症指标联合可有效评估患者预后状态。

Objective

To investigate the application value of modified CT severity index (MCTSI) and detection of serum inflammatory factors in the prediction of pancreatic infection and prognosis evaluation of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

Methods

A total of 110 patients with SAP in Weihai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were enrolled in this study between May 2020 and December 2022. Patients were enrolled at the starting point and observed for 28 days They were divided into infected group (n=21) and uninfected group (n=89) according to the presence or absence of secondary pancreatic infection. Based on the prognosis, the patients were divided into survival group (n=93) and death group (n=17). All patients were subjected to enhanced CT examination and detection of serum inflammatory factors on the first day after admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of MCTSI combined with serum inflammatory factors (IL-6/8/10) for secondary pancreatic infection and prognosis.

Results

Serum IL-6 and IL-8 levels in the infected group were higher than those in the uninfected group, and IL-10 level were lower than that in the uninfected group (P<0.05). The MCTSI showed no significant difference between the infected group and the uninfected group at admission (P>0.05). The area under the ROC curve of joint prediction of serum IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 for pancreatic infection in patients with SAP was 0.850, greater than that of each index single prediction (0.750, 0.736, 0.728) (P<0.05). Serum IL-6 and IL-8 levels in the death group at admission were lower than those in the survival group, and IL-10 level was higher than that in the survival group (P<0.05). The death group had higher MCTSI score than the survival group at admission (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve of MCTSI combined with serum inflammatory factors for prognosis of patients with SAP was 0.872, greater than that of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 or MCTSI score alone (0.687, 0.685, 0.667, 0.773) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The incresde of serum IL-6 and IL-8 and the decrease of IL-10 can be used as sensitive indicators of pancreatic infection in patients with SAP. Although the MCTSI score cannot effectively predict pancreatic infection, it can be used for evaluating prognosis when combined with serum inflammatory factors.

表1 感染组与未感染组一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 感染组与未感染组MCTSI评分与血清炎性指标水平比较(±s
图1 血清炎性指标水平对胰腺感染的预测价值
表3 血清炎性指标水平对胰腺感染的预测价值
表4 生存组与死亡组MCTSI评分与血清炎性指标水平比较(±s
图2 MCTSI评分联合血清炎性指标预测重症急性胰腺炎患者预后效能分析
表5 MCTSI评分联合血清炎性指标水平预测重症急性胰腺炎患者预后效能分析
[1]
Horibe M, Sanui M, Sasaki M, et al. Impact of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Severe Acute Pancreatitis on the Development of Invasive Candidiasis: A Large Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study[J]. Pancreas, 2019, 48(4): 537-543.
[2]
Song G, Ma Z, Liu D, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuate severe acute pancreatitis via regulation of microRNA-9 to inhibit necroptosis in rats[J]. Life Sci, 2019, 223(15): 9-21.
[3]
孙博睿, 张春, 林婷, 等. CRRT对重症急性胰腺炎患者接受经皮引流治疗的影响:一项回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2019, 31(6): 714-718.
[4]
Mcgregor A, Kim S, Norwich-Cavanaugh A, et al. Clinical Value of Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Combined With Computed Tomography for Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Melanoma[J]. Ann Plas Surg, 2019, 82(4): S192-S194.
[5]
Yamashita R, Perrin T, Chakraborty J, et al. Radiomic feature reproducibility in contrast-enhanced CT of the pancreas is affected by variabilities in scan parameters and manual segmentation[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(1): 195-205.
[6]
Thomson JE, Nweke EE, Brand M, et al. Transient Expression of Interleukin-21 in the Second Hit of Acute Pancreatitis May Potentiate Immune Paresis in Severe Acute Pancreatitis[J]. Pancreas, 2019, 48(1): 107-112.
[7]
蔡兆辉, 左爽, 李海山, 等. BISAP和CTSI评分变化用于判断急性胰腺炎患者病情严重程度的临床价值[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 94-96.
[8]
王兴鹏, 李兆申, 袁耀宗, 等. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2013, 29(4): 656-660.
[9]
孙备, 李乐. 急性胰腺炎的诊断与评估——基于亚特兰大分类标准修订版共识的解读[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(2): 85-88.
[10]
中华医学会外科学会胰腺外科学组. 重症急性胰腺炎诊治草案[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2001, 11(16): 699-700.
[11]
El Kurdi B, Babar S, El Iskandarani M, et al. Acute pancreatitis CT severity index(CTSI) versus modified CT severity index(MCTSI) for the prediction of severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Pancreas, 2019, 48(10): 1422.
[12]
Li HY, He HC, Song JF, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair severe acute pancreatitis by secreting miR-181a-5p to target PTEN/Akt/TGF-β1 signaling[J]. Cell Signal, 2019, 66(2): 109436.
[13]
Maatman TK, Weber DJ, Timsina LR, et al. Antibiotic irrigation during pancreatoduodenectomy to prevent infection and pancreatic fistula: A randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Surgery, 2019, 166(4): 53-59.
[14]
谢红, 张雅卫, 吴丹阳. 重症急性胰腺炎继发胰腺感染的临床特点和影响因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(5): 730-733.
[15]
贾绘, 倪薇, 包成明, 等. CT和彩色多普勒超声对急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝的临床诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(3): 239-243.
[16]
Chen L, Ying Z, Xing L. Information Gain Regression Analysis of Diagnostic Value of CT in Severe Acute Pancreatitis[J]. J Med Imag Health In, 2020, 10(1): 60-64.
[17]
Wang L, Zeng YB, Chen JY, et al. A simple new scoring system for predicting the mortality of severe acute pancreatitis: A retrospective clinical study[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(23): e20646.
[18]
孟红兵, 曹兴健, 范玉萍, 等. Balthazar CT评分联合血浆D-二聚体对重症急性胰腺炎患者预后的预测价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2019, 16(8): 1082-1085.
[19]
李强, 付君静, 窦文广, 等. CT评价系统联合血浆D-二聚体对重症急性胰腺炎预后的预测价值[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 34(10): 1050-1053.
[20]
潘静, 覃月秋, 徐晨阳, 等. 急性胰腺炎患者血清IL-6、IL-10水平变化及其与淋巴细胞自噬凋亡的相关性[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 34(27): 21-24.
[21]
Zhu X, Hou C, Tu M, et al. Gene polymorphisms in the interleukins gene and the risk of acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis[J]. Cytokine, 2019, 115(15): 50-59.
[22]
Gasteiger S, Primavesi F, Gbel G, et al. Early Post-Operative Pancreatitis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Assessed by Serum Lipase and IL-6 Predict Pancreatic Fistula[J]. World J Surg, 2020, 44(3): 68-73.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 宫丹丹, 孙飞飞, 于健, 姜晓东. 重症急性胰腺炎死亡风险因素分析及风险评估模型建立[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 19-25.
[3] 孙亚慧, 李甜甜. 在重症急性胰腺炎患者继发感染中调节性T细胞/辅助性T细胞17失衡的机制研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 475-480.
[4] 杨晶, 高青. 重症急性胰腺炎继发脓毒症的危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 105-110.
[5] 王晓梅, 刘冰, 马丽琼, 卢祖静, 苗建军. 基于LASSO-Cox回归分析的非轻症急性胰腺炎死亡风险列线图预测模型的建立和临床应用效果分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 44-50.
[6] 黄翠君, 张喜玲, 刘思嘉, 刘云建. 重症急性胰腺炎营养支持治疗研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 385-390.
[7] 陈慧, 范婷, 李春花, 黄其密, 陈晓英, 翁启明, 彭茹, 唐思, 何佳霖, 陈庆, 王旖旎, 汤玲一. 重症急性胰腺炎并发肺部感染临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 856-859.
[8] 高军龙, 张昕, 周倩倩, 袁媛. 重症急性胰腺炎早期免疫抑制的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 286-291.
[9] 刘伟, 高续, 谢玉海, 蒋哲, 刘士成. 基于增强CT影像组学模型在预测急性胰腺炎复发中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 348-354.
[10] 汪纾羽, 焦茹, 石运涛. 早期肠内营养和微生态免疫肠内营养对重症急性胰腺炎患者肾损伤的预防效果及影响因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 132-136.
[11] 王小红, 钱晶, 翁文俊, 周国雄, 朱顺星, 祁小鸣, 刘春, 王萍, 沈伟, 程睿智, 秦璟灏. 巯基丙酮酸硫基转移酶调控核因子κB信号介导自噬对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠的影响及机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 422-426.
[12] 马强, 李军, 苟丽娟. 重症急性胰腺炎miR-21-3p、RUNX3表达水平及对病情发展程度的预测[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 337-341.
[13] 王迎芝, 张先进, 杨士彦. 益生菌结合早期肠内营养对重症急性胰腺炎患者营养状况、肠黏膜屏障功能及肠内营养耐受性的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 55-58.
[14] 宋轶, 仲益龙, 路晓光, 战丽彬, 范治伟, 路童, 陈海铭, 芮庆林. 大黄附子汤改善小鼠重症急性胰腺炎肠动力障碍的机制研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 216-221.
[15] 宋轶, 赵伟彤, 路晓光, 战丽彬, 陈海铭, 路童, 康新, 芮庆林. 大黄附子汤对重症急性胰腺炎小鼠肠道微皱褶细胞变化的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 167-173.
阅读次数
全文


摘要