切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 229 -234. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2025.03.008

论著

基于食管癌术后吻合口瘘危险因素建立风险预测列线图模型及临床决策曲线分析
王秋艳1, 杨爱民1, 程春1, 周洋1,()   
  1. 1. 226011 江苏省,南通市肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-03 出版日期:2025-06-01
  • 通信作者: 周洋
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省南通市卫生健康委员会项目(QNZ2022027)

Risk prediction nomogram model establishing and clinical DCA analysis based on the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery

Qiuyan Wang1, Aimin Yang1, Chun Cheng1, Yang Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nantong Cancer Hospital, Nantong 226011, China
  • Received:2025-01-03 Published:2025-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yang Zhou
引用本文:

王秋艳, 杨爱民, 程春, 周洋. 基于食管癌术后吻合口瘘危险因素建立风险预测列线图模型及临床决策曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 229-234.

Qiuyan Wang, Aimin Yang, Chun Cheng, Yang Zhou. Risk prediction nomogram model establishing and clinical DCA analysis based on the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(03): 229-234.

目的

探究食管癌术后吻合口瘘的危险因素,基于危险因素建立风险预测列线图模型,并通过临床决策曲线分析(DCA)评估该模型的预测效能和临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性选取2020 年1 月至2024 年9 月南通市肿瘤医院收治食管癌手术患者342 例,根据术后是否并发吻合口瘘,划分为发生组(n=36)与未发生组(n=306)。比较两组患者基线资料、围手术期相关指标、血清学因子水平差异,运用Lasso 与多因素Logistic 回归筛选食管癌术后吻合口瘘风险因素,构建风险预测列线图模型,并通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)验证其预测准确性。通过Bootstrap 法与DCA决策曲线对其进行内部验证,验证列线图模型的稳定性与收益。

结果

发生组与非发生组中合并糖尿病、吸烟史、吻合方式、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、白蛋白比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Lasso 回归显示,糖尿病、吻合方式、白蛋白均可纳入食管癌术后吻合口瘘风险预测模型。二元Logistic 回归显示,有糖尿病、手工吻合方式、低白蛋白水平是影响食管癌术后吻合口瘘的独立危险因素(均P<0.001)。ROC 结果显示,合并糖尿病、吻合方式、白蛋白、列线图模型预测食管癌术后吻合口瘘曲线下面积分别为0.713、0.726、0.787、0.904;灵敏度分别为0.583、0.583、0.735、0.889;特异度分别为0.843、0.869、0.750、0.788。通过Bootstrap 法(B=1000)行内部验证,C 指数为0.807,表明食管癌术后吻合口瘘预警模型有良好稳定性。决策分析表明,该模型均能带来净收益,明显优于无效策略。

结论

合并糖尿病、手工吻合、低白蛋白为食管癌术后吻合口瘘的独立风险因素,据此建立的风险预测模型效能佳、稳定,且具净收益,优于无策略对照。

Objective

To explore the risk factors of postoperative anastomotic fistula of esophageal cancer, establish a risk prediction nomogram model based on the risk factors, and evaluate the prediction efficiency and clinical application value of this model through clinical decision curve analysis(DCA).

Methods

A total of 342 patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery in Nantong Cancer Hospital from January 2020 to September 2024 were retrospectively selected and divided into occurrence group (n=36) and non-occurrence group (n=306) according to whether postoperative anastomotic fistula was complicated.The differences in baseline data, perioperative relevant indicators and serological factors between the two groups were compared.Lasso and multivariate Logistic regression were used to screen the risk factors of postoperative anastomotic fistula for esophageal cancer, the risk prediction nomogram model was constructed, and the prediction accuracy was verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Bootstrap method and DCA decision curve were used for internal verification to verify the stability and benefits of the nomogram model.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in diabetes mellitus, smoking history, anastomosis mode, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and albumin between the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group (all P<0.05).Lasso regression showed that diabetes mellitus, anastomotic mode and albumin could be included in the risk prediction model of anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery.Binary Logistic regression showed that diabetes mellitus, manual anastomosis and low albumin level were independent risk factors for anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery (all P<0.001).ROC results showed that the area under the curve predicted by diabetes, anastomotic mode, albumin and nomogram models was 0.713, 0.726, 0.787 and 0.904,respectively.The sensitivity was 0.583, 0.583, 0.735 and 0.889, respectively.The specificity was 0.843, 0.869,0.750 and 0.788, respectively.Internal verification was performed by Bootstrap method (B=1000), and C-indexwas 0.807, indicating that the early warning model of anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery had good stability.Decision analysis showed that the model can bring net benefits, which was obviously better than the ineffective strategy.

Conclusion

Diabetes mellitus, manual anastomosis and low albumin are independent risk factors for anastomotic fistula after esophageal cancer surgery.The established risk prediction model is effective, stable and has net benefit, which is better than the control without strategy.

表1 两组食管癌手术患者临床资料比较
组别 例数 性别[例(%)] 年龄(岁,xˉ± s ) 体重指数(kg/m2,xˉ± s ) 合并糖尿病[例(%)] 吸烟史[例(%)] 饮酒史[例(%)]
发生组 36 22(61.11) 14(38.89) 62.33±8.97 24.10±3.07 21(58.33) 15(41.67) 25(69.44) 11(30.56) 10(27.78) 26(72.22)
非发生组 306 189(61.76) 117(38.24) 61.52±8.76 23.79±2.94 48(15.69) 258(84.31) 148(48.37) 158(51.63) 82(26.80) 224(73.20)
χ 2/t 0.006 0.528 0.594 36.376 5.725 0.016
P 0.939 0.598 0.553 <0.001 0.017 0.900
组别 例数 肿瘤位置[例(%)] 病理分型[例(%)] 手术方式[例(%)] 吻合方式[例(%)] 手术时间(min,xˉ± s ) 术中出血量(mL,xˉ± s )
胸上段 胸中段 胸下段 鳞癌 腺癌 开胸 胸腔镜 手工 机器
发生组 36 7(19.44) 15(41.67) 14(38.89) 29(80.56) 7(19.44) 13(36.11) 23(63.89) 21(58.33) 15(41.67) 240.78±40.34 322.08±77.37
非发生组 306 58(18.95) 126(41.18) 122(39.87) 252(82.35) 54(17.65) 104(33.99) 202(66.01) 40(13.07) 266(86.93) 241.11±37.96 319.62±75.71
χ 2/t 0.014 0.071 0.065 45.027 -0.050 0.184
P 0.993 0.790 0.799 <0.001 0.960 0.854
组别 例数 收缩压(mmHg,xˉ± s ) 舒张压(mmHg,xˉ± s ) 总胆固醇(mmol/L,xˉ± s ) LDL-C(mmol/L,xˉ± s ) 血红蛋白(g/L, xˉ± s ) 白蛋白(g/L,xˉ± s ) 白细胞计数(109/L, xˉ± s )
发生组 36 130.39±14.00 78.47±9.46 4.94±1.05 2.87±0.88 126.77±16.37 35.23±4.60 8.55±2.49
非发生组 306 129.63±14.60 79.15±9.09 4.88±1.06 3.31±0.80 127.41±15.16 40.15±3.85 8.64±2.32
t 0.296 -0.421 0.294 -3.051 -0.239 -7.097 -0.225
P 0.767 0.674 0.769 0.002 0.811 <0.001 0.822
图1 惩罚系数与模型中变量的关系
图2 多因素Lasso 回归结果
表2 变量赋值
图3 列线图预警模型构建
表3 Logistic 回归分析食管癌术后吻合口瘘的独立危险因素
表4 各项因子数值与Nomogrm 分数的对应关系
图4 ROC 曲线分析列线图模型对食管癌术后吻合口瘘的预测价值
表5 ROC 曲线分析列线图模型对食管癌术后吻合口瘘的预测价值
图5 列线图风险预警模型的校准曲线
图6 列线图风险预警模型的决策曲线
[1]
胡银燕, 赵林芳, 贺晓映, 等.1 例食管癌术后并发重度免疫检查点抑制剂相关肺炎及吻合口瘘患者的护理[J].中华护理杂志,2024, 59(14): 1752-1756.
[2]
Hagens E, Feenstra M, Lam WC, et al.C-Reactive Protein as a Negative Predictive Marker for Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery[J].World J Surg, 2023,47(8): 1995-2002.
[3]
魏政道, 周建丰, 杨玉赏, 等.新辅助治疗后食管癌术后肺部并发症和吻合口瘘的预后意义[J].免疫学杂志, 2024, 40(3): 295-302.
[4]
陈海南, 冷雪峰.食管癌术后吻合口瘘预测因子及相关预测模型的研究进展[J].临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 892-895.
[5]
Anas D, Elkharbotly IAMH, Mohammad Y, et al.Novel Mediastinoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2023, 30(7): 4030-4039.
[6]
白成云, 李忠诚, 李文军, 等.食管癌切除术后发生吻合口瘘风险的列线图建立和验证[J/OL].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志, 2023,10(3): 401-407.
[7]
Ren LF, Xu YH, Long JG.Prognostic Value of Postoperative Complication for Gastric Cancer[J].J Lap Adv Surg Tech, 2024,34(4): 339-353.
[8]
周芝森, 王成, 冯泽伟, 等.外周血炎性指标与食管癌吻合口瘘发生的相关性[J].兰州大学学报(医学版), 2023, 49(10): 40-45, 51.
[9]
Tiainen E, Wirta EV, Tyrväinen T, et al.Calcifications in the descending thoracic aorta predict postoperative anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer[J].World J Surg, 2024, 48(5):1209-1218.
[10]
靳凤梅, 李转梅.食管癌术后颈部食管胃吻合口瘘的相关影响因素分析[J].实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(1): 133-135.
[11]
金新天, 王强, 王俊荣, 等.重建贲门、胃底、His 角预防食管癌术后胸内吻合口瘘的应用效果[J].中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(15):3657-3659.
[12]
Mankarious MM, Portolese AC, Meloria A, et al.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase risk for anastomotic leak for simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A NSQIP-colectomy analysis[J].J Surg Oncol,2023, 128(1): 58-65.
[13]
翁艳, 王青, 刘晓川, 等.内镜下钛夹联合氩等离子体凝固治疗食管癌术后吻合口瘘患者的临床效果[J].广西医学, 2023, 45(6):639-641, 665.
[14]
张帅, 葛晓晴, 张进, 等.术后早期血脂代谢水平、C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值对食管癌术后吻合口瘘的预测效果分析[J].中国综合临床, 2022, 38(3): 199-204.
[15]
Hirano Y, Konishi T, Kaneko H, et al.Author response to: Comment on: Early postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy[J].Br J Surg, 2023,110(9): 1243.
[16]
彭胜祖, 王彬, 张凯, 等.经鼻内引流治疗食管癌术后吻合口瘘伴胸腔或纵隔脓肿效果观察[J].肿瘤研究与临床, 2024, 36(11):843-846.
[17]
Zhao J, Zhao Y, Yang S, et al.Thoracoscopic repair for esophageal pulmonary fistula after esophageal atresia repair[J].Pediatr Surg,2022, 57(11): 538-542.
[18]
蒋朋朋, 王兴邦, 霍前伦.全腔镜食管癌根治McKeown 术式发生吻合口瘘的危险因素分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(9): 1229-1232.
[19]
王海, 杨更朴, 柴立勋, 等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术对食管癌患者肺功能、免疫功能的影响及颈部吻合口瘘的影响因素探讨[J].现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(14): 2668-2672.
[20]
Li S, Qiu R, Yuan G, et al.Body composition in relation to postoperative anastomotic leakage and overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer[J].Nutrition, 2022, 94: 111534.
[21]
阚奇伟, 高元平, 刘泗军, 等.食管癌术后吻合口瘘与无创正压通气之间的关系探讨[J].实用老年医学, 2023, 37(4): 426-428.
[22]
Gao Z, Chen X, Bai D, et al.A Novel Intraoperative Leak Test Procedure (GAM Procedure) to Prevent Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy[J].Surg Lap Endosc Percut Tech, 2023, 33(3): 224-230.
[23]
高从荣, 范军, 裴韶华, 等.食管癌患者术前营养风险评估及与术后吻合口瘘和住院时间的关系研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2022, 22(16): 3132-3136.
[24]
聂洪鑫, 王兵, 杨思豪, 等.食管癌术后食管胃吻合口瘘危险因素的系统评价与Meta分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2022,29(2): 166-178.
[25]
Maria NO, Giulio C, Brigida B, et al.Rates of Endoscopic Recurrence In Postoperative Crohn's Disease Based on Anastomotic Techniques: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2023, 30(10): 1877-1887.
[26]
林红兰, 任艳军, 杨文超, 等.早期肠内营养对食管癌根治术后患者预后影响的研究[J].中华保健医学杂志, 2023, 25(6): 688-690.
[1] 王琪, 杨春凤, 宋宏萍, 许磊. 2021 至2023 年陕西省渭北农村地区基于超声的乳腺癌筛查结果及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(02): 106-113.
[2] 余静雅, 石玉兰, 向利娟, 陈城, 罗钰堞. 老年慢性创面患者衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(02): 141-147.
[3] 赵艾红, 唐为娟, 傅俊建, 徐湘. 重度肺炎患儿感染后闭塞性细支气管炎列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 77-83.
[4] 袁强, 张华宇, 闫璋哲, 朱含放, 陈光, 孙亮, 吕远, 陈纲, 赵锁. cN0峡部偏侧甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的术前预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 333-336.
[5] 沈丹枫, 常鹏, 陆颖超, 徐红星, 顾强. PCT、CRP对急性胆管炎严重程度的早期预测价值及列线图模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 192-195.
[6] 李峥, 马晋峰. 基于炎症反应评分系统构建预测根治性术后食管胃结合部腺癌患者预后的列线图模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 170-175.
[7] 刘志静, 马婧, 王利颖, 李朋, 张亚楠, 陈童真. 终末期肺癌患者癌因性疲乏及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 310-314.
[8] 张宏斌, 杨振宇, 谭凯, 刘冠, 尚磊, 杜锡林. 不可切除肝癌转化治疗后手术的影响因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 387-394.
[9] 刘春熠, 孙齐, 史中巍, 黄静. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后恶心呕吐的影响因素与防治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 245-249.
[10] 邓玮, 周筛兰, 杨波, 林志亮. 肠道菌群移植治疗便秘患者出院准备度现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 148-154.
[11] 赵洁, 曹文芳. 食管癌超声特征与NLR、LMR、NMR水平的相关性及对颈部Ⅳ区淋巴结转移风险的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 130-134.
[12] 方海丽, 王俊, 栾琳. HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者诱发肝性脑病风险列线图模型构建与验证应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 144-148.
[13] 李子木, 蒋祥德, 王强强, 施朕善. 营养评估在预测老年食管癌患者放疗及同步放化疗急性不良事件中的作用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 33-40.
[14] 王伟伟, 李霞林, 龚景进, 孙雯, 张丽姿, 王永. 复发性子痫前期临床特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 95-101.
[15] 黄镪, 崔莹, 赵莹莹, 张拥波. 围手术期卒中患者的临床预后及其影响因素[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 115-125.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?