切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -25. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.01.004

论著

超声剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及淋巴结转移评估中的应用研究
李广飞1, 李振涛2, 刘宝1, 胥明婧1, 年梦雨1,()   
  1. 1221000 江苏省,徐州市第一人民医院超声医学科
    2221000 江苏省,徐州市第一人民医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-11 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 年梦雨

Application of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and evaluation of lymph node metastasis

Guangfei Li1, Zhentao Li2, Bao Liu1, Mingjing Xu1, Mengyu Nian1,()   

  1. 1Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, China
    2Department of Gastroenterology, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Received:2025-03-11 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Mengyu Nian
引用本文:

李广飞, 李振涛, 刘宝, 胥明婧, 年梦雨. 超声剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及淋巴结转移评估中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 21-25.

Guangfei Li, Zhentao Li, Bao Liu, Mingjing Xu, Mengyu Nian. Application of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and evaluation of lymph node metastasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(01): 21-25.

目的

探究超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在直肠癌诊断及淋巴结转移评估中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性选取徐州市第一人民医院2021年10月至2024年10月收治的96例直肠肿瘤患者为研究对象,通过病理检查结果对照分析SWE对直肠癌的诊断价值,多因素Logistic回归分析SWE参数与淋巴结转移关系,绘制ROC曲线分析SWE参数对淋巴结转移的评估价值。

结果

96例直肠肿瘤患者病理检查结果显示,直肠癌患者75例,非直肠癌患者21例。SWE检查显示,直肠癌患者杨氏模量均值、弹性方差均高于非直肠癌患者(P<0.05),直肠癌患者与非直肠癌患者弹性对比度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,单一指标诊断直肠癌时,杨氏模量值均值诊断直肠癌的AUC为0.850,敏感度73.33%,特异度为90.48%,弹性方差诊断直肠癌的AUC为0.846,敏感度为62.67%,特异度为95.24%,联合诊断时,杨氏模量均值、弹性方差联合诊断直肠癌的AUC最高为0.946,敏感度为95.67%,特异度为90.48%。75例直肠癌患者经根治性手术明确淋巴结转移31例,淋巴结转移患者杨氏模量均值、弹性方差均高于淋巴结未转移患者(P<0.05),淋巴结转移与淋巴结未转移患者弹性对比度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,单一指标评估直肠癌淋巴结转移时,杨氏模量值均值评估淋巴结转移的AUC为0.828,敏感度67.14%,特异度为88.64%,弹性方差评估淋巴结转移AUC为0.848,敏感度为74.19%,特异度为81.28%,联合诊断时,杨氏模量均值、弹性方差联合评估淋巴结转移为AUC最高为0.927,敏感度为96.77%,特异度为88.64%。

结论

SWE参数杨氏模量均值、弹性方差在直肠癌诊断及淋巴结转移评估中具有重要价值。

Objective

To investigate the application value of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and evaluation of lymph node metastasis.

Methods

A total of 96 patients with rectal tumors admitted to Xuzhou First People's Hospital from October 2021 to October 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The value of SWE in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and evaluation of lymph node metastasis was analyzed.

Results

Pathological results showed that among 96 patients with rectal tumors enrolled in this study, there were 75 patients with rectal cancer and 21 patients without. The mean Young's modulus and elastic variance of patients with rectal cancer were higher than those of patients without (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in elasticity contrast between patients with rectal cancer and those without (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that for diagnosing rectal cancer, the AUC, specificity and sensitivity of mean Young's modulus were 0.850, 73.33% and 90.48%. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of elastic variance were 0.846, 62.67% and 95.24%. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of combination of mean Young's modulus and elastic variance were 0.946, 95.67% and 90.48%. Among 75 patients with rectal cancer, 31 patients were confirmed to have lymph node metastasis after radical surgery. The mean Young's modulus and elastic variance of patients with lymph node metastasis were higher than those of patients without (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in elasticity contrast between patients with lymph node metastasis and those without (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that for evaluating lymph node metastasis, the AUC, specificity and sensitivity of mean Young's modulus were 0.828, 67.14% and 88.64%. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of elastic variance were 0.848, 74.19% and 81.28%. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of combination of mean Young's modulus and elastic variance were 0.927, 96.77% and 88.64%.

Conclusion

The SWE parameters (mean Young's modulus and elastic variance) are of high value in the diagnosis of rectal cancer and evaluation of lymph node metastasis.

表1 直肠癌与非直肠癌患者剪切波弹性成像参数比较(±s
图1 剪切波弹性成像参数对直肠癌诊断价值ROC曲线图
表2 剪切波弹性成像参数对直肠癌诊断价值ROC曲线分析
表3 直肠癌患者淋巴结转移与淋巴结未转移患者剪切波弹性成像参数比较(±s
图2 剪切波弹性成像参数对直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的评估价值ROC曲线图
表4 剪切波弹性成像参数对直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的评估价值ROC曲线分析
[1]
Lee S, Kassam Z, Baheti AD, et, al. Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY), 2023, 48(9): 2792-2806.
[2]
王俊波, 王晋君, 丁建峰, 等. T2WI 3D-SPACE+RS-EPI DWI检查对直肠癌术前肿瘤淋巴结分期诊断准确率的影响[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2024, 22(6): 142-144.
[3]
Wetzel A, Viswanath S, Gorgun E, et, al. Staging and Restaging of Rectal Cancer with MRI: A Pictorial Review[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2022, 43(6): 441-454.
[4]
李秀庚, 王高翔, 蒲亚陆. LINC01600在结直肠癌临床诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2024, 41(2): 344-347.
[5]
Lord AC, D'Souza N, Shaw A, et, al. MRI-Diagnosed Tumor Deposits and EMVI Status Have Superior Prognostic Accuracy to Current Clinical TNM Staging in Rectal Cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 276(2): 334-344.
[6]
卢建明, 武雅婷, 田锦, 等. 微血管成像联合实时剪切波弹性成像在浅表淋巴结良恶性鉴别上的价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(10): 1157-1160.
[7]
杨凯, 何蕊玲, 马苏美, 等. 剪切波弹性成像测量脾脏硬度预测肝硬化高风险食管胃底静脉曲张[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2024, 32(11): 1155-1159.
[8]
Bates DDB, Homsi ME, Chang KJ, et, al. MRI for Rectal Cancer: Staging, mrCRM, EMVI, Lymph Node Staging and Post-Treatment Response[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 10-18.
[9]
张珊珊, 李诺, 刘露, 等. 经直肠超声结合剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及TNM分期中的应用[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2021, 31(14): 20-24.
[10]
Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Marques CFS, Pires C, et, al. Diagnosis of Clinical Complete Response by Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy(pCLE) After Chemoradiation for Advanced Rectal Cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(2): 357-368.
[11]
胡君, 沈会明, 戚敏, 等. 非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌剪切波弹性成像Emax值与临床病理学的关系[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(12): 1345-1349.
[12]
钱清富, 卓敏玲, 唐懿, 等. 剪切波弹性成像评估局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后T再分期的应用价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2024, 33(1): 71-76.
[13]
卓敏玲, 陈志奎, 唐懿, 等. 经胸心脏超声剪切波弹性成像在健康志愿者和肥厚型心肌病患者心肌硬度检测中的应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(44): 4087-4092.
[14]
Cong Y, Fan Z, Dai Y, et, al. Application Value of Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Tumor Downstaging for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2021, 40(1): 81-89.
[15]
中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会术中放疗协作组. 结直肠癌术中放疗专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(4): 299-306.
[16]
徐林生, 徐翔, 杨金凤, 等. 血清AREG水平及CT定量参数与直肠癌脉管侵犯、淋巴结转移的相关性及预测价值研究[J]. 放射学实践, 2024, 39(5): 652-657.
[17]
唐娉娉, 王庆军, 马贺骥. 基于3. 0T MRI及ADC值在鉴别直肠癌旁肿瘤沉积与转移淋巴结中的价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2024, 43(9): 1539-1545.
[18]
Loft MK, Pedersen MRV, Grimm P, et, al. Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Shear Wave Elastography in Rectal Cancer[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2022, 14(11): 2633.
[19]
郭旭, 余卫峰, 王丽玲, 等. 剪切波弹性成像联合常规超声预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的临床价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2024, 26(12): 1009-1015.
[20]
唐俊伟, 王晓伟, 李扬, 等. 中低位直肠癌患者第253组淋巴结转移特点及其影响因素分析(附2316例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(6): 773-778.
[21]
周伟, 王燕. 基于常规超声和剪切波弹性成像的列线图预测乳腺癌淋巴结转移的临床价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2024, 26(11): 932-938.
[22]
顾懿娴, 袁志宏, 庞智, 等. 剪切波弹性成像在检测克罗恩病患者病变肠壁中的应用[J].江苏医药, 2024, 50(12):1239-1241, 1245, 1297.
[1] 潘辰蕊, 杨冰洁, 沈会明, 王颖彦, 韩佳豪, 李嘉. 多模态超声联合免疫炎症指标预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(10): 969-975.
[2] 张涛, 徐梓祎, 徐景竹, 王兴华. 急性肾静脉闭塞肾脏不同区域杨氏模量差异性的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(10): 982-987.
[3] 张俊清, 周秘, 张文军, 谭静, 尹立雪. 射血分数保留肝硬化患者的肝脏硬度与左心室功能超声特征及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 768-776.
[4] 蒋钟吉, 郭洪, 王东文. 近红外显影技术在前列腺癌淋巴组织显影及病理评估中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 8-14.
[5] 田超, 黄若曦, 蒋茂林, 谢崇伟, 刁鹏飞, 钟苏权, 陈东, 王航涛, 陈桂柳, 陈虞娟, 李国良. 不同亚型前列腺癌新辅助化疗后盆腔淋巴结转移的风险因素及时间分布[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 727-735.
[6] 俞颖倩, 徐兴祥. 淋巴结转移与非转移对原发性支气管肺癌免疫微环境及免疫治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1027-1030.
[7] 梁国刚, 周云鹏, 王龙辉, 孙国志. 低位直肠癌保肛手术预防性回肠造口并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 491-496.
[8] 潘胜淇, 李兴源, 王佳琦, 关竣庭, 丁可, 常泽文, 汤庆超. 三臂与四臂达芬奇机器人手术系统在乙状结肠与中高位直肠癌根治术中应用的近期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 509-515.
[9] 唐鑫, 管子龙, 朱爽, 刘方舟, 孙国栋, 王天阳, 石云浩, 齐浩楠, 刘云霄, 王佳琦, 袁子茗, 张巍远, 黄睿. 国产手术机器人与腹腔镜在直肠癌患者术后短期疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 516-525.
[10] 张宇坤, 王春林, 周珉玮, 李震洋, 周易明, 顾晓冬, 项建斌. 放疗诱导微卫星稳定型结直肠癌细胞外泌体成分变化及其增强CD8+T细胞功能的体外研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 526-532.
[11] 张金珠, 陈海鹏, 赵志勋, 王锡山. 耗竭性CD8+T细胞表型对结直肠癌免疫检查点阻断剂疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 533-537.
[12] 王思远, 刘馨, 曹永丽, 李明, 张远耀, 魏东. 经自然腔道取标本手术在结直肠肿瘤中无菌与无瘤技术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 538-545.
[13] 宋柯瑾, 李文星. 肿瘤相关中性粒细胞在结直肠癌中的双重调控作用及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 546-551.
[14] 李梦哲, 梁鸿, 郑伟, 王洗, 杨展鹏, 范青文, 张超. 经肛辅助在腹腔镜低位直肠癌完全经腹括约肌间切除术保肛手术中的应用价值:37例病例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 552-558.
[15] 侯芳红, 贺修宝. 超声介导的雷公藤甲素外泌体靶向给药系统抗结直肠癌的应用评估[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 13-20.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?