切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 153 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2017.04.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

窄带成像放大内镜与内镜活检诊断胃肿瘤的效果
王丽慧1, 季万胜2, 代洪生1, 张春平1, 高志星2,()   
  1. 1. 261042 山东省,潍坊医学院
    2. 261031 山东省,潍坊医学院附属医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-05 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 高志星

Effect of narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer

Lihui Wang1, Wansheng Ji2, Hongsheng Dai1, Chunping Zhang1, Zhixing Gao2,()   

  1. 1. Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261042, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261031, China
  • Received:2016-09-05 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhixing Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Gao Zhixing, Email:
引用本文:

王丽慧, 季万胜, 代洪生, 张春平, 高志星. 窄带成像放大内镜与内镜活检诊断胃肿瘤的效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(04): 153-158.

Lihui Wang, Wansheng Ji, Hongsheng Dai, Chunping Zhang, Zhixing Gao. Effect of narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(04): 153-158.

目的

探讨窄带成像技术结合放大胃镜(narrow band imaging-magnifying endoscopy,NBI-ME)及内镜活检在早期胃癌及癌前病变诊断中的价值及差异。

方法

收集2016年3月至2016年6月于潍坊医学院附属医院胃镜室行普通白光内镜(white light endoscopy,WLE)疑有早期胃癌或癌前病变的患者共50例,NBI-ME模式下观察胃小凹开口形态,并做出内镜下诊断,于病变最明显处取活检行病理检查,所有患者均行内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)或外科手术治疗。对NBI-ME下的胃腺管开口形态与术后切除病理结果进行分析,并将NBI-ME及内镜活检的诊断结果与术后大体病理结果进行对比分析。

结果

胃黏膜腺管开口的形态与术后病理诊断比较之间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=42.13,P<0.05)。NBI-ME对低级别上皮内瘤变(low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia,LGIN)诊断的灵敏度与内镜活检比较,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.02),而对LGIN诊断的特异度、准确率比较,NBI-ME与内镜活检之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NBI-ME对早期胃癌诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确率与内镜活检比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NBI-ME、内镜活检与术后病理诊断进行一致性检验的Kappa值分别为0.54、0.64(P<0.05)。

结论

NBI-ME对早期胃癌及癌前病变的诊断有较高的临床应用价值,但与病理活组织检查结果相比仍存在差异;NBI-ME可对内镜准确活检提供较大帮助。

Objective

To explore the value and difference of narrow band imaging-magnifying endoscopy(NBI-ME)and endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Methods

Fifty patients with suspicious early gastric lesions or precancerous lesions as revealed by white light endoscopy(WLE)were enrolled in the study from March 2016 to June 2016 in Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University.All lesions were observed through NBI-ME, and the types of crypt-opening were recorded to give a diagnosis.Biopsy specimens were then taken from suspicious lesions for pathological examination.All patients received endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)or surgical intervention.The types of crypt-opening were analyzed in combination with postoperative pathological diagnosis.The diagnosis of NBI-ME and endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological diagnosis were compared and analyzed.

Results

There was significant difference in the type of crypt-opening and the postoperative pathological diagnosis(χ2=42.13, P<0.05). The sensitivity of NBI-ME for diagnosing low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia(LGIN)was significantly lower than that of endoscopic biopsy(P=0.02), but there was no statistical difference in diagnostic specificity and accuracy between the two modalities(P>0.05). The differences of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between NBI-ME and endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer were not statistically significant(P>0.05). The Kappa values of the consistency checks were 0.54(NBI-ME and postoperative pathological diagnosis)and 0.64(endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological diagnosis), with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).

Conclusion

NBI-ME has a high clinical value in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, but there are still differences compared with the results of pathological biopsy.NBI-ME can provide a great help to accurate endoscopic biopsy.

图1 低级别上皮内瘤变(LGIN)的白光内镜(WLE)、窄带成像技术结合放大胃镜(NBI-ME)及内镜活检图像。1A:WLE下,自贲门至胃体底小弯见一白色瘢痕,散在糜烂,黏膜充血水肿;1B:腺管开口粗大,排列尚整齐,血管纹理欠清晰;1C:内镜活检诊断为慢性轻度萎缩性胃炎,部分腺体轻度肠上皮化生,局部腺体呈LGIN(HE×100)
图2 高级别上皮内瘤变(HGIN)的白光内镜(WLE)、窄带成像技术结合放大胃镜(NBI-ME)及内镜活检图像。2A:WLE下,胃底近贲门处见凹陷样糜烂;2B:NBI-ME下见腺体粗大,排列整齐;2C:内镜活检为轻度慢性萎缩性胃炎伴急性炎症反应,局部腺体呈HGIN
图3 黏膜内癌的白光内镜(WLE)、窄带成像技术结合放大胃镜(NBI-ME)、内镜活检及术后剥离的病变组织图像。3A:WLE下可见贲门胃底处一隆起性病变,表面糜烂;3B:血管变形、扭曲,腺管形态呈脑回形;3C:内镜活检为黏膜内癌,口端及肛端未查见癌细胞(HE×100);3D:内镜黏膜下剥离术后剥离的病变组织
表1 胃黏膜腺管开口形态与术后病理诊断结果分析(例)
表2 NBI-ME、内镜活检诊断LGIN的统计结果(%)
表3 NBI-ME、内镜活检诊断早期胃癌的统计结果(%)
表4 NBI-ME诊断与术后病理诊断关系(例)
表5 内镜活检诊断与术后病理诊断关系(例)
1
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.Cancer statistics, 2009[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2009, 59(4): 225-249.
2
Tanaka K, Toyoda H, Kadowaki S, et al.Surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy for identifying early gastric cancers[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2008, 67(3): 430-437.
3
Yao K. How is the VS(vessel plus surface)classification system applicable to magnifying narrow-band imaging examinations of gastric neoplasias initially diagnosed as low-grade adenomas? [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2012, 15(2): 118-120.
4
Dixon MF.Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited[J]. Gut, 2002, 51(1): 130-131.
5
Bansal A, Ulusarac O. Correlation between narrow band imaging and nonneoplastic gastric pathology: a pilot feasibility trial[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2008, 67(2): 210-216.
6
Kawamura M, Abe S, Oikawa K, et al.Topographic differences in gastric micromucosal patterns observed by magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging [J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 26(3): 477-483.
7
Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, et al.Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2012, 15(1): 91-96.
8
Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW, et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric adenomatous polyps: predictive factors for early gastric cancer[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2012, 47(10): 1218-1225.
9
Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2011, 46(3): 325-331.
10
Kadowaki S, Tanaka K, Toyoda H, et al.Ease of early gastric cancer demarcation recognition: a comparison of four magnifying endoscopy methods[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 24(10): 1625-1630.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[13] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要