切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 219 -223. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2025.03.006

论著

信迪利单抗联合仑伐替尼及经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效及对细胞免疫功能的影响
胡捷1,(), 汪曙红1, 张威威1   
  1. 1. 245000 安徽省,黄山市人民医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-12 出版日期:2025-06-01
  • 通信作者: 胡捷

Effect of cindilizumab combined with ranvartinib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced liver cancer and its influence on cellular immune function

Jie Hu1,(), Shuhong Wang1, Weiwei Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Huangshan People's Hospital, 245000, China
  • Received:2024-08-12 Published:2025-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jie Hu
引用本文:

胡捷, 汪曙红, 张威威. 信迪利单抗联合仑伐替尼及经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效及对细胞免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 219-223.

Jie Hu, Shuhong Wang, Weiwei Zhang. Effect of cindilizumab combined with ranvartinib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced liver cancer and its influence on cellular immune function[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(03): 219-223.

目的

分析程序性死亡受体-1 抑制剂信迪利单抗联合多靶点受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂仑伐替尼及经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗中晚期肝癌患者的疗效及对细胞免疫功能的影响。

方法

选取2020 年6 月至2023 年6 月黄山市人民医院收治的100 例中晚期肝癌患者,使用简单随机抽样法分别纳入观察组(n=50)、对照组(n=50),2 组均接受信迪利单抗联合仑伐替尼治疗,观察组加用TACE。对比2 组近期疗效、治疗前后肿瘤标志物和细胞免疫功能变化、不良反应发生率,通过随访记录其1 年生存情况。

结果

治疗3 个月后,观察组客观缓解率、疾病控制率分别为42.00%、82.00%,均较对照组的20.00%、64.00%更高(P<0.05);2 组治疗后甲胎蛋白、异常凝血酶原、癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9 均较治疗前下降,观察组均较对照组更低(P<0.05);2 组治疗后CD3+、CD8+均较治疗前下降,CD4+、CD4+/CD8+均较治疗前升高,观察组CD3+、CD8+均较对照组更低,CD4+、CD4+/CD8+均对照组更高(P<0.05)。2 组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1 年后,观察组均较对照组平均无进展生存期[(10.17±2.08)比(8.04±1.75)个月]、总生存期[(18.83±3.19)比(15.34±2.29)个月]更长(P<0.05)。

结论

在信迪利单抗联合仑伐替尼的基础上,将TACE 应用于中晚期肝癌患者的治疗能够取得更为理想的近期疗效,在不增加不良反应的同时改善患者肿瘤标志物和免疫功能,延长生存期。

Objective

To analyze the efficacy of programmed death receptor-1(PD-1) inhibitor cindilizumab combined with multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ranvartinib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of patients with advanced liver cancer and its influence on cellular immune function.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with advanced liver cancer in Huangshan People's Hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 were selected for a controlled study.The observation group (n=50) and the control group (n=50) were included respectively by simple random sampling method.Both groups were treated with cindilizumab combined with ranvartinib, and the observation group was added with TACE.The short-term curative effect, changes of tumor markers and cellular immune function before and after treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups, and their 1-year survival was recorded through follow-up.

Results

After 3 months of treatment, the objective remission rate and disease control rate of the observation group were 42.00% and 82.00% respectively, which were higher than those of the control group (20.00% and 64.00%,respectively) (P<0.05).After 3 months of treatment, AFP, PIVKA-Ⅱ, CEA and CA19-9 in both groups decreased compared with those before treatment, and the levels in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).After 3 months of treatment, CD3+ and CD8+ in both groups decreased, while CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ increased.CD3+ and CD8+ in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).The average progression free survival [(10.17±2.08) months vs.(8.04±1.75) months] and overall survival [(18.83±3.19) months vs.(15.34±2.29) months]of the observation group were longer than those of the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

On the basis of cindilizumab combined with ranvartinib, TACE can achieve better short-term efficacy in patients with advanced liver cancer, and can improve tumor markers and immune function without increasing adverse reactions, and prolong survival period.

表1 2 组中晚期肝癌患者临床资料比较
表2 2 组中晚期肝癌患者治疗3 个月后近期疗效比较[例(%)]
表3 2 组中晚期肝癌患者治疗前后肿瘤标志物变化比较(±s
表4 2 组中晚期肝癌患者治疗前后细胞免疫指标变化比较(±s
表5 2 组中晚期肝癌患者治疗期间不良反应发生率比较[例(%)]
图1 2 组中晚期肝癌患者无进展生存时间的Kalpan-Meier 曲线
图2 2 组中晚期肝癌患者总生存时间的Kalpan-Meier 曲线
[1]
Zou X, Xu Q, You R, et al.Correlation and efficacy of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus based on immunological features[J].Cancer Med, 2023, 12(10): 11315-11333.
[2]
Wang WJ, Liu ZH, Wang K, et al.Efficacy and safety of TACE combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent HCC: A multicenter, retrospective study[J].Cancer Med,2023, 12(10): 11513-11524.
[3]
申雪晗, 周江敏, 张志伟, 等.NLR 对 TACE 联合仑伐替尼及免疫治疗的中晚期肝癌患者预后的预测价值[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2023, 35(1): 19-24.
[4]
Zou X, Xu Q, You R, et al.Evaluating the benefits of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus[J].Adv Ther, 2023,40(4): 1686-1704.
[5]
Xiang YJ, Wang K, Yu HM, et al.Transarterial chemoembolization plus a PD-1 inhibitor with or without lenvatinib for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatol Res, 2022, 52(8): 721-729.
[6]
黄英, 杨志勇, 罗明.卡瑞利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼治疗晚期原发性肝癌患者疗效和安全性分析[J].实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(4): 595-598.
[7]
胡邵宁, 朱书渊, 魏燕斌.仑伐替尼联合 TACE 治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效及对血清 Ki-67, PCNA, GP73, GPC-3 水平的影响[J].世界华人消化杂志, 2023, 31(11): 470-476.
[8]
Xin Y, Zhang X, Liu N, et al.Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor with or without transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatol Int, 2023, 17(3): 753-764.
[9]
Zeng ZX, Wu JY, Wu JY, et al.The TAE score predicts prognosis of unresectable HCC patients treated with TACE plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitors[J].Hepatol Int, 2024, 18(2): 651-660.
[10]
陈家诚, 刘路政, 陈良, 等.肝癌细胞仑伐替尼耐药的基因筛选及其通路研究[J].肝胆胰外科杂志, 2022, 34(3): 157-163.
[11]
刘张, 苑珠, 李慧龙, 等.肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼及 PD-1抑制剂治疗晚期肝癌后消化道多处穿孔一例[J].肝胆胰外科杂志, 2024, 36(5): 302-305.
[12]
赵磊, 王文鑫, 毕京峰, 等.甲胎蛋白联合谷氨酰转移酶对晚期乙肝相关性肝癌男性患者应用仑伐替尼治疗后进展的预测价值[J].解放军医学院学报, 2022, 43(5): 507-511.
[13]
Sheng Y, Wang Q, Liu HF, et al.Prognostic nomogram model for selecting between transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib,with and without PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Br J Radiol, 2024, 97(1155): 668-679.
[14]
王颖栋, 丁海斌, 黄子超, 等.华蟾素联合仑伐替尼治疗经动脉化疗栓塞术后原发性肝癌患者的近期疗效[J].医学临床研究,2022, 39(1): 9-12.
[15]
Diao L, Wang C, You R, et al.Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for HCC refractory to TACE[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 39(4): 746-753.
[16]
Li X, Wang X, Bai T, et al.Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using lenvatinib combined with TACE plus PD-1 inhibitor: A real-world observational study[J].Dig Liver Dis, 2024, 56(6): 1078-1086.
[17]
彭雨, 李海涛, 杨文丽, 等.PD-1 抑制剂联合仑伐替尼治疗老年中晚期原发性肝癌患者临床疗效研究[J].实用肝脏病杂志, 2023,26(1): 112-115.
[18]
Yang S, Liang H, Li X, et al.Is the TAE score a promising prognostic predictor for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitors? Further validation should be performed[J].Hepatol Int, 2024, 18(3): 1058-1059.
[1] 顾怡君, 李奕冉, 钱艺, 蒋栋. 超声造影定量指标对初治原发性肝癌患者经皮微波消融术后复发的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(03): 238-246.
[2] 张光亚, 方荣喜, 吴鹏, 肖虎. 腹腔镜下不同入肝血流阻断肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 376-379.
[3] 黎伟忠, 黎嘉历, 张映南, 莫灿荣. 改良Glisson鞘外阻断在腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 453-456.
[4] 钱小梅, 罗洪, 李智慧, 周代君, 李东. 76例乙型肝炎肝硬化并发原发性肝癌的高危因素Logistic分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 251-253.
[5] 中华医学会器官移植学分会肝移植学组, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国肝移植受者抗胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白临床应用指南[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-354.
[6] 张敏, 朱建华, 缪雅芳, 郭锦荣. 菝葜皂苷元对肝癌HepG2细胞抑制作用的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 328-335.
[7] 曾士桃, 严庆, 廖珊, 陈焕伟. 肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼及PD-1抑制剂与肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 225-231.
[8] 吴哲境, 李敬东, 熊永福, 刘刚, 陈雷. 吲哚菁绿在解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 25-29.
[9] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[10] 宋然, 郑雅各. 仑伐替尼联合肝动脉插管化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除晚期肝癌的疗效及生存率影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 120-124.
[11] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[12] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[13] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[14] 刘玉奇, 李健, 仲捷, 李群, 常帅, 于春鹏. 微波消融同步肝动脉插管化疗栓塞联合靶免治疗大肝癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 110-116.
[15] 陈文, 张兴华, 严海涛, 张金星, 刘圣, 施海彬, 祖庆泉. 经动脉化疗栓塞术联合仑伐替尼和免疫检查点抑制剂对不可切除肝细胞癌的安全性及有效性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 117-122.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?