切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 370 -375. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2025.04.014

论著

超声脂肪分数对中青年代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者病情严重程度及糖脂代谢的评估价值
文丽君1,2, 王渝洲2, 蒋东波2, 巫晓伟2, 岳文胜1,()   
  1. 1673000 四川南充,川北医学院附属医院超声科,川北医学院附属医院院士工作站,川北医学院附属医院超声研究室,医学影像四川省重点实验室,超声医学工程南充市重点实验室
    2641100 四川省,内江市第二人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-30 出版日期:2025-08-01
  • 通信作者: 岳文胜

Evaluation value of ultrasound fat fraction in grading and glycolipid metabolism of young and middle-aged patients with metabolism-related fatty liver disease

Lijun Wen1,2, Yuzhou Wang2, Dongbo Jiang2, Xiaowei Wu2, Wensheng Yue1,()   

  1. 1Department of Ultrasound, Academician Workstation, Ultrasound Laboratory, Afiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Nanchong Key Laboratory of Medical Ulrasound Engineering, Nanchong 637000, China
    2Department of Ultrasound, Second People's Hospital of Neijiang City, Neijiang 641100, China
  • Received:2025-03-30 Published:2025-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Wensheng Yue
引用本文:

文丽君, 王渝洲, 蒋东波, 巫晓伟, 岳文胜. 超声脂肪分数对中青年代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者病情严重程度及糖脂代谢的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 370-375.

Lijun Wen, Yuzhou Wang, Dongbo Jiang, Xiaowei Wu, Wensheng Yue. Evaluation value of ultrasound fat fraction in grading and glycolipid metabolism of young and middle-aged patients with metabolism-related fatty liver disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(04): 370-375.

目的

探讨超声脂肪分数(UDFF)对中青年代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)患者病情严重程度及糖脂代谢的评估价值。

方法

回顾性分析2022年3月至2025年3月内江市第二人民医院收治的152例中青年MAFLD患者的临床资料,所有患者均检测UDFF、磁共振质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF),根据患者病情严重程度分为轻度脂肪性肝病组(PDFF S1)102例,中重度脂肪性肝病组(PDFF S2、S3)50例;收集患者的糖脂代谢相关指标[空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)]。根据MAFLD患者的不同糖脂代谢程度,以是否出现明显肝纤维化进行分组,出现明显肝纤维化患者为A组,无/轻微肝纤维化患者为B组,比较不同组别间的UDFF差异。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)评估UDFF对MAFLD患者病情严重程度及糖脂代谢的诊断价值。

结果

轻度组FBG、HOMA-IR、TC、TG、LDL-C高于中重度组,HbA1c、HDL-C、UDFF低于中重度组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组UDFF值(7.66±1.20)%低于B组的(12.23±3.49)%,差异有统计学意义(t=11.400,P<0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,UDFF与MAFLD病情严重程度具有正相关性(OR=7.503,95% CI 3.427~16.456,P<0.001);ROC曲线显示,UDFF评估MAFLD患者病情严重程度的AUC为0.856(95% CI 0.825~0.886),最佳截断值18.5%,灵敏度86%,特异度82%。Logistic回归分析显示,UDFF与糖脂代谢异常显著正相关(P<0.001),UDFF每增加1%,MAFLD患者糖脂代谢异常风险升高132%(OR=2.325,95% CI 1.852~2.912,P<0.001);ROC曲线显示,UDFF评估MAFLD患者糖脂代谢程度的AUC为0.873,最佳截断值为9.5%,灵敏度80.3%,特异度76.5%。

结论

UDFF通过定量肝脏脂肪含量,对不同病情严重程度的MAFLD患者诊断效能较好,有助于评估反映糖脂代谢异常和肝纤维化程度,为临床诊断和治疗提供参考。

Objective

To investigate the value of ultrasound fat fraction (UDFF) in evaluating the severity of disease and glucose lipid metabolism in young and middle-aged patients with metabolism-related fatty liver disease (MAFLD).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data of 152 young and middle-aged MAFLD patients admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Neijiang City from March 2022 to March 2025. All patients were examined for UDFF and magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). According to the pathological grade of liver steatosis, all patients were divided into two groups: 102 cases in the mild fatty liver disease group (PDFF S1) and 50 cases in the moderate-to-severe fatty liver disease group (PDFF S2、S3); the relevant indicators related to glycolipid metabolism [fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)] of the patients were collected; and the patients with MAFLD were grouped based on the different degrees of glycolipid metabolism, they were also grouped based on whether there was obvious liver fibrosis, among them, patients with obvious liver fibrosis were classified as group A and patients without/with minor liver fibrosis were classified as group B, and the UDFF differences between different groups were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of UDFF for the disease classification and glycolipid metabolism of MAFLD patients.

Results

The levels of FBG, HOMA-IR, TC, TG and LDL-c in the mild group were higher than those in the moderate to severe group, while HbA1c, HDL-c and UDFF were lower than those in the moderate to severe group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The UDFF in group A was (7.66±1.20)%, which was lower than that in group B [(12.23±3.49)%], with a statistically significant difference (t=11.400, P<0.001). The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that UDFF was positively correlated with the severity of MAFLD (OR=7.503, 95% CI: 3.427-16.456, P<0.001), the ROC curve showed that the AUC of UDFF in evaluating the severity of the disease in patients with MAFLD was 0.856 (95% CI: 0.825-0.886), the optimal cut-off value was 18.5%, the sensitivity was 86%, and the specificity was 82%. The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that UDFF was significantly positively correlated with abnormal glycolipid metabolism (P<0.001), for every 1% increase in UDFF, the risk of abnormal glycolipid metabolism in patients with MAFLD increased by 132% (OR=2.325, 95% CI: 1.852-2.912, P<0.001), the ROC curve showed that the AUC of UDFF in evaluating the degree of glycolipid metabolism in patients with MAFLD was 0.873, the optimal cut-off value was 9.5%, the sensitivity was 80.3%, and the specificity was 76.5%.

Conclusion

By quantifying liver fat content, UDFF has a good diagnostic efficacy for MAFLD patients with different severity of disease, which helps to evaluate the degree of abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism and liver fibrosis, and provides an important reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

图1 超声脂肪分数检测示意图
图2 轻度组对应超声脂肪分数图
图3 中重度组对应超声脂肪分数图
表1 不同病情严重程度代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者的临床指标比较( ± s
图4 无/轻微肝纤维化患者对应超声脂肪分数图
图5 明显肝纤维化患者对应超声脂肪分数图
图6 超声脂肪分数对代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者病情严重程度诊断ROC曲线
图7 超声脂肪分数对代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者糖脂代谢程度诊断ROC曲线
[1]
Pouwels S, Sakran N, Graham Y, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD): a review of pathophysiology, clinical management and effects of weight loss[J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2022, 22(1): 63.
[2]
王贝贝, 罗玮, 范培云, 等.中高海拔地区2型糖尿病患者抵抗素基因多态性与代谢相关脂肪性肝病相关性的研究[J].中国糖尿病杂志, 2024, 32(1): 23-28.
[3]
倪雪桐, 王若羲, 张晶, 等.非酒精性脂肪性肝病、代谢相关脂肪性肝病与心血管疾病关联的国内外研究进展[J].中国全科医学, 2024, 27(16): 2033-2038.
[4]
杨晨, 余上海, 徐飞鹏, 等.磁共振质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)在肝脂肪定量中的应用[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(3): 600-605.
[5]
Kubale R, Schneider G, Lessenich CPN, et al.Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2024, 222(6): e2330775.
[6]
薛芮, 范建高.代谢相关脂肪性肝病新定义的国际专家共识简介[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(6): 1224-1227.
[7]
Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR, et al.Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2012, 36(1): 22-29.
[8]
冯巩, 李雪萍, 寇喆, 等.MAFLD、NAFLD与慢性肾脏病的研究进展[J].肝脏, 2023, 28(10): 1252-1256.
[9]
黄韵琳, 程娟, 王颖, 等.超声脂肪分数定量检测肝脂肪变性的可靠性研究[J].肿瘤影像学, 2023, 32(4): 324-327.
[10]
王米雪, 杨学平, 王连双, 等.超声脂肪分数评估代谢相关脂肪性肝病的初步研究[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(4): 433-436.
[11]
崔会鹏, 田昊宇, 关琳, 等.代谢相关性脂肪性肝病无创诊断方法研究进展[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 99-103.
[12]
Wang X, Bamber JC, Esquivel-Sirvent R, et al.Ultrasonic Sound Speed Estimation for Liver Fat Quantification: A Review by the AIUM-RSNA QIBA Pulse-Echo Quantitative Ultrasound Initiative[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2023, 49(11): 2327-2335.
[13]
吴霞, 王训, 谭燕, 等.超声定量肝肾指数用于诊断儿童非酒精性脂肪性肝病[J].中国介入影像与治疗学, 2024, 21(2): 89-93.
[14]
李岩, 颜学兵, 陆忠华, 等.非酒精性脂肪性肝病更名前后的人群分布变化及代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病肝纤维化的危险因素分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(6): 1136-1141.
[15]
袁宇婷, 吴小勤, 薛全胜.AIFM2和MFN2与代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者胰岛素抵抗及进展性肝纤维化相关性的分析[J].国际消化病杂志, 2024, 44(2): 113-118.
[16]
刘云霄, 牛丽娜, 王转国, 等.代谢健康状态和肥胖对代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者发生肝纤维化风险的影响研究[J].中国医药, 2024, 19(3): 400-404.
[17]
贺佳, 魏枫, 刘美岚, 等. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病伴2型糖尿病患者内脏脂肪与肝纤维化的关系[J].河北医科大学学报, 2024, 45(5): 566-572.
[1] 马旦杰, 黄品同, 徐琛, 周芳芳, 潘敏强. 超声造影LI-RADS系统联合甲胎蛋白对有无高危因素背景人群肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 288-296.
[2] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[3] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[4] 刘超凡, 王文越, 杨珵璨, 朱冬梓, 王兵. 胃袖状切除术上调循环Nrg4浓度抑制肝脏脂肪酸合成改善肥胖小鼠肝脏脂肪变性[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 133-136.
[5] 程柏凯, 杨光. 高胰岛素-正葡萄糖钳夹技术评估慢性肾脏病患者胰岛素抵抗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 334-339.
[6] 陈利, 杨长青, 朱风尚. 重视炎症性肠病和代谢相关脂肪性肝病间的串话机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 385-389.
[7] 秦楠, 汪川, 穆尼热·穆合塔尔, 蒋升. 2 型糖尿病患者维生素D 与胰岛功能的相关性[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 199-205.
[8] 魏晓伟, 薛婧, 肇炜博, 史琳涛, 夏素影, 施瑾怡, 王静, 贾海英, 王爱红. 青年男性血清尿酸和尿酸/肌酐对代谢相关脂肪性肝病初筛价值的探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1111-1117.
[9] 孙琳, 韩萍萍, 张碧琳, 张军霞. 血清WISP1水平与2型糖尿病患者血尿酸升高的相关性[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 178-182.
[10] 王嘉琳, 宋青. 妊娠合并胰岛素抵抗诊治的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 29-32.
[11] 何玉花, 钟欢妹, 王文惠, 沈永棋, 刘映云, 顾国威, 陈丹娜. 不同表型多囊卵巢综合征患者代谢指标及肥胖相关指标对多囊卵巢综合征合并代谢综合征人群的诊断效能分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 212-220.
[12] 门航, 厉周, 韩帅. 肥胖与2 型糖尿病研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 62-69.
[13] 张杨杨, 项楚淇, 朱满生. 肌少性肥胖与非酒精性脂肪性肝病间的关系以及研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 276-282.
[14] 冯婷, 叶俊钊. 粪菌移植治疗肥胖及代谢相关脂肪性肝病的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 138-144.
[15] 崔磊, 徐东升. 减重手术治疗肥胖患者胰岛素抵抗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 127-132.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?