切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 26 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.01.005

论著

英夫利西单抗生物类似物与原研药治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性比较:真实世界队列分析
王晨冉1, 江学良2,()   
  1. 1250001 济南,山东中医药大学
    2250001 济南,山东中医药大学第二附属医院消化中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-21 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 江学良
  • 基金资助:
    山东省中医药科技项目(M20241905)

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilars and the original drug in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Real-world cohort analysis

Chenran Wang1, Xueliang Jiang2,()   

  1. 1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250001, China
    2Gastroenterology Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250001, China
  • Received:2025-04-21 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xueliang Jiang
引用本文:

王晨冉, 江学良. 英夫利西单抗生物类似物与原研药治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性比较:真实世界队列分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 26-30.

Chenran Wang, Xueliang Jiang. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilars and the original drug in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Real-world cohort analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(01): 26-30.

目的

比较英夫利西单抗生物类似物与原研药治疗中国成人中重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列分析。纳入2017年12月至2023年12月就诊于山东中医药大学第二附属医院消化中心(来自中国17个省份)的121例接受英夫利西单抗生物类似物或英夫利西单抗原研药治疗的成人中度至重度活动性UC患者。在诱导治疗8周期间评估原研药与生物类似物治疗UC的疗效和安全性。主要观察终点为第8周临床应答率,次要观察终点为第8周临床缓解率、内镜下黏膜愈合率、C反应蛋白、大便次数及不良事件。

结果

纳入121例UC患者中61例使用原研药,60例使用生物类似物。生物类似物组中,患者在第8周的临床应答率、临床缓解率、内镜下黏膜愈合率分别为73.3%、55.0%、53.3%。原研药组中,患者在第8周的临床应答率、临床缓解率、内镜下黏膜愈合率分别为70.5%、56.7%、57.4%。两组患者第8周的临床应答率、临床缓解率、内镜下黏膜愈合率均无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者C反应蛋白、大便次数与治疗前相比均明显降低(P<0.05),两组治疗后的数值则无明显差异(P>0.05)。3例(2.5%)患者出现不良事件:其中2例使用原研药,分别表现为双上肢轻微皮肤瘙痒、脱发;1例使用生物类似物,表现为轻微胸闷。

结论

英夫利西单抗生物类似物在诱导UC患者病情缓解方面的疗效和安全性与原研药相当。

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) biosimilar versus originator in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 121 adults with moderate-to-severe active UC treated with IFX biosimilar or originator at the Gastroenterology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (covering 17 provinces in China) between December 2017 and December 2023. Efficacy and safety were evaluated during the 8-week induction phase. The primary endpoint was clinical response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included clinical remission rate at week 8, endoscopic mucosal healing rate, C-reactive protein, stool frequency, and adverse events.

Results

Among 121 patients, 61 received originator and 60 received biosimilar. In the biosimilar group, the clinical response rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate of the patients at the 8th week were 73.3%, 55.0%, and 53.3%, respectively. In the original drug group, the clinical response rate, clinical remission rate, and endoscopic mucosal healing rate of the patients at the 8th week were 70.5%, 56.7%, and 57.4% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). Both groups showed significant reductions in CRP and stool frequency from baseline (P<0.05), with comparable post-treatment values between the two groups (P>0.05). Three patients (2.5%) experienced adverse events: two in the originator group (mild pruritus on both upper limbs, alopecia) and one in the biosimilar group (mild chest tightness).

Conclusion

Infliximab biosimilar demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to the originator in inducing clinical remission in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe UC.

表1 两组溃疡性结肠炎患者人口统计学和基线特征
表2 两组溃疡性结肠炎患者治疗后第8周疗效指标比较
[1]
Rubin DT, Ananthakrishnan AN, Siegel CA, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2019, 114(3): 384-413.
[2]
中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病学组, 中国炎症性肠病诊疗质量控制评估中心. 中国溃疡性结肠炎诊治指南(2023年·西安)[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2024, 44(2): 73-79.
[3]
王蓉, 唐源. 生物制剂在炎症性肠病治疗中的应用分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2021, 26(8): 1068–1071, 1074.
[4]
Kumar P, Vuyyuru SK, Kante B, et al. Efficacy and safety of biosimilar versus originator infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A real-world cohort analysis[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2022, 41(5): 446-455.
[5]
Gecse KB, Lakatos PL. Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Comfort and Future Prospects [J]. Drugs, 2016, 76(15): 1413-1420.
[6]
高净, 江学良. 低剂量英夫利昔单抗不同给药次数治疗激素抵抗型溃疡性结肠炎[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2013, 21(15): 1453-1457.
[7]
王阳, 江学良, 郭玉婷, 等. 英夫利西单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的有效性及安全性[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2022, 39(1): 50-52.
[8]
Sieczkowska J, Jarzębicka D, Banaszkiewicz A, et al. Switching Between Infliximab Originator and Biosimilar in Paediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Preliminary Observations[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2016, 10(2): 127-32.
[9]
Ben-Horin S, Vande Casteele N, Schreiber S, et al. Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Facts and Fears of Extrapolation[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 14(12): 1685-1696.
[10]
Park DI. Current status of biosimilars in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases[J]. Intest Res, 2016, 14(1): 15-20.
[11]
金献, 靖大道. 生物仿制药治疗炎症性肠病的研究进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2017, 37(4): 234-237.
[12]
Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(23): 2462-2476.
[13]
张浩冉, 崔海栋, 梁国英. 生物制剂在溃疡性结肠炎治疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2023, 43(4): 213-216.
[14]
Hanauer SB. Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic opportunities[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2006, 12 Suppl 1: S3-S9.
[15]
Sonu I, Blonski W, Lin MV, et al. An approach to the management of refractory ulcerative colitis[J]. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, 2010, 56(3): 213-231.
[16]
Mortensen C, Caspersen S, Christensen NL, et al. Treatment of acute ulcerative colitis with infliximab, a retrospective study from three Danish hospitals[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2011, 5(1): 28-33.
[17]
Lichtenstein GR, Soonasra A, Latymer M, et al. Systematicreview: effectiveness and safety of switching between originator infliximab and biosimilar infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2024, 24(7): 691-708.
[18]
Jahnsen J, Detlie TE, Vatn S, Ricanek P. Biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A Norwegian observational study[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 9 Suppl 1: 45-52.
[19]
Kim NH, Lee JH, Hong SN, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of CT-P13, a biosimilar of infliximab, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective multicenter study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 34(9): 1523-1532.
[20]
Gonczi L, Gecse KB, Vegh Z, et al. Long-term Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Infliximab After One Year in a Prospective Nationwide Cohort[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2017, 23(11): 1908-1915.
[21]
Argüelles-Arias F, Guerra Veloz MF, Perea Amarillo R, et al. Erratum to: Effectiveness and Safety of CT-P13(Biosimilar Infliximab) in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Real Life at 6 Months[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2017, 62(8): 2203.
[22]
余佳丽, 江学良. 从炎症性肠病治疗策略转变看生物制剂应用进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(3): 129-134.
[23]
Ito T. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated alopecia areata[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2017, 176(6): 1444-1445.
[24]
Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, NOR-SWITCH study group. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR- SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10086): 2304-2316.
[25]
Martelli L, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2019, 26(2): 270-279.
[1] 深圳市医学会乳腺病学分会, 深圳市医学会肿瘤学分会, 深圳市医师协会乳腺专科医师分会, 深圳市健康管理协会乳房健康与康复管理专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会, 深圳市中西医结合学会甲状腺乳腺病专业委员会. 乳腺癌新辅助治疗的疗效预测和疗效评价专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 321-330.
[2] 朱鑫瑞, 牛敏, 杜艳. 基于色氨酸代谢的溃疡性结肠炎相关研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 321-326.
[3] 潘栋超, 姚龙, 沈立一, 傅继弟. 分层引流技术在化脓性颅内感染治疗中的应用与疗效[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 362-367.
[4] 张升涛, 丁敬健, 刘洋, 郭永锋, 祁亚斌, 李亚俊. 回字型右下入路与常规中间入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 30-33.
[5] 李可, 徐航. 单侧腺叶切除治疗结节性甲状腺肿的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 55-58.
[6] 严征远, 张恒, 曹能琦, 方兴超, 陈大敏. 单孔+1腹腔镜结直肠癌根治切除术的有效性及安全性临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 615-618.
[7] 王思竣, 王琼, 李珂雨, 袁新普, 张硕珉, 马睿, 谢天宇, 张朝军. 胃上部癌新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗后实施近端胃切除术的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 637-641.
[8] 郑文涛, 肖静, 欧阳兵, 吴毅, 廖开友, 李春林. 载药微球CalliSpheres经支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 691-696.
[9] 刘丽辉, 白玉新, 张进, 冯巍, 黄琰琰, 邹梦斯, 刘彩红. 血清生物标志物联合检测对支气管哮喘患儿生物靶向治疗效果的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 796-801.
[10] 邓晓冬, 杨育辉, 曾笛, 万瑜, 罗凯菲, 罗榆凌. 基于单细胞测序和微阵列芯片数据识别溃疡性结肠炎的治疗靶点及分子亚型[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 275-282.
[11] 张宇涵, 吴添庆, 高汶卿, 郑梽楷, 贺珉睿, 周仲国. 不可切除性肝内胆管癌不同治疗方式疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 939-947.
[12] 潘胜淇, 李兴源, 王佳琦, 关竣庭, 丁可, 常泽文, 汤庆超. 三臂与四臂达芬奇机器人手术系统在乙状结肠与中高位直肠癌根治术中应用的近期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 509-515.
[13] 李鹏, 赵成亮, 曾祥瑞, 王斐, 杨菲. PELD术中选择单侧入路三根减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效与安全性的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 351-358.
[14] 张峥祥, 高龙, 李文. 柴胡疏肝散对胃食管反流病患者的效果及细胞因子、肠道菌群水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 590-593.
[15] 李朋娟, 李红阁, 张秦俊. 健脾化湿汤加减治疗脾胃湿热型幽门螺杆菌相关性慢性非萎缩性胃炎的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 599-603.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?