切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 47 -52. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.01.009

论著

肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者内镜治疗后再出血风险列线图的构建与验证
慈娟娟(), 吴俊成, 朱琴琴   
  1. 213000 江苏常州,苏州大学附属第三医院(常州市第一人民医院)消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-11 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 慈娟娟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(82200629)

Construction and verification of a nomogram of rebleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal and gastric varices rupture and bleeding after endoscopic treatment

Juanjuan Ci(), Juncheng Wu, Qinqin Zhu   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou), Changzhou 213000, China
  • Received:2025-09-11 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Juanjuan Ci
引用本文:

慈娟娟, 吴俊成, 朱琴琴. 肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者内镜治疗后再出血风险列线图的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 47-52.

Juanjuan Ci, Juncheng Wu, Qinqin Zhu. Construction and verification of a nomogram of rebleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal and gastric varices rupture and bleeding after endoscopic treatment[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(01): 47-52.

目的

探讨内镜治疗肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血(EVB)患者再出血的风险因素,并对应建立预测模型。

方法

回顾性纳入2022年8月至2024年8月于常州市第一人民医院就诊的肝硬化合并EVB患者109例,经内镜治疗后1年随访再出血情况,按治疗后是否再出血分为再出血组(17例)和未再出血组(92例),采用单因素分析临床各项指标与内镜下治疗后再出血的关系,建立预测模型,评估模型拟合度,分析其临床价值。

结果

109例患者经内镜治疗后72 h止血成功率100%,随访1年,其中17例(15.59%)发生再出血。性别、年龄、肝硬化病因、食管静脉曲张程度、胃底静脉曲张、感染、白细胞计数、血小板、尿素氮、肌酐、血清白蛋白、凝血酶原时间、纤维蛋白原、门静脉内径、脾静脉内径及脾脏厚度均与内镜治疗肝硬化合并EVB患者再出血风险无关(P>0.05);治疗方法、门静脉栓子、总胆红素、血红蛋白、腹水及Child-Pugh分级与内镜治疗肝硬化合并EVB患者再出血风险有关(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,门静脉栓子、血红蛋白、合并腹水及Child-Pugh分级是内镜治疗肝硬化合并EVB患者再出血的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于以上4项指标建立列线图模型,C-index为0.877,校准曲线拟合良好;模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.877(95% CI 0.798~0.928,P<0.001)。

结论

基于门静脉栓子、血红蛋白、合并腹水及Child-Pugh分级构建的列线图,可有效预测内镜治疗肝硬化合并EVB患者再出血风险,具有较好的临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the risk factors of rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with esophageal and gastric varices rupture and bleeding (EVB) treated by endoscopy, and to establish a corresponding predictive model.

Methods

A total of 109 patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB who visited the First People's Hospital of Changzhou from August 2022 to August 2024 were retrospectively included. The rebleeding situation was followed up for one year after endoscopic treatment. They were divided into the rebleeding group (17 cases) and the non-rebleeding group (92 cases) according to whether there was rebleeding after treatment. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between various clinical indicators and rebleeding after endoscopic treatment. A predictive model was established, the model's fit degree was evaluated, and its clinical value was analyzed.

Results

The hemostasis success rate of 109 patients within 72 hours after endoscopic treatment was 100%. During the 1-year follow-up, 17 cases (15.59%) experienced rebleeding. Gender, age, etiology of liver cirrhosis, degree of esophageal varices, gastric fundus varices, infection, white blood cell count, platelet count, urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum protein, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter and spleen thickness were all not related to the risk of rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB after endoscopic treatment (P>0.05). The treatment methods, portal vein emboli, total bilirubin, hemoglobin, ascites and Child-Pugh classification were related to the risk of rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB treated by endoscopy (P<0.05). The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that portal vein emboli, hemoglobin, combined ascites and Child-Pugh classification were independent risk factors for rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB treated by endoscopy (P<0.05). Based on the above four indicators, a nomogram model was established. The C-index was 0.877, and the calibration curve fitted well. The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.877 (95% CI: 0.798-0.928, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The nomogram constructed based on portal vein emboli, hemoglobin, combined ascites and Child-Pugh classification can effectively predict the risk of rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with EVB treated by endoscopy, and has good clinical application value.

表1 两组肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者临床资料比较
指标 再出血组(n=17) 未再出血组(n=92) χ2/t P
性别[例(%)]     0.030 0.863
12(70.59) 63(68.48)    
5(29.41) 29(31.52)    
年龄(岁,±s) 55.13±6.73 55.26±6.74 0.073 0.942
肝硬化病因[例(%)]     0.138 0.987
病毒性肝炎 10(58.82) 50(53.35)    
酒精性肝病 2(11.76) 11(11.96)    
自身免疫性肝病 2(11.76) 13(14.13)    
其他 3(17.65) 18(19.56)    
腹水[例(%)]     6.462 0.011
14(82.35) 45(48.91)    
3(17.65) 47(51.09)    
食管静脉曲张程度[例(%)]     2.530 0.282
轻度 0(0.00) 1(1.09)    
中度 2(11.76) 3(3.26)    
重度 15(88.24) 88(95.65)    
胃底静脉曲[例(%)]     0.007 0.933
12(70.59) 64(69.57)    
5(29.41) 28(30.43)    
感染[例(%)]     3.491 0.062
5(29.41) 11(11.96)    
12(70.59) 81(88.04)    
白细胞计数(×109/L,±s) 6.23±0.74 6.33±0.75 0.506 0.614
血小板(×109/L,±s) 75.77±8.23 76.03±8.55 0.116 0.908
尿素氮(mmol/L,±s) 7.11±0.85 7.15±0.87 0.175 0.862
肌酐(μmol/L,±s) 72.11±8.92 71.86±8.46 0.111 0.912
白蛋白(g/L,±s) 23.95±3.47 23.53±3.48 0.457 0.648
凝血酶原时间(s,±s) 13.95±2.46 13.78±2.43 0.265 0.792
纤维蛋白原(g/L,±s) 2.78±0.33 2.79±0.35 0.109 0.913
总胆红素(μmol/L,±s) 24.59±3.72 18.73±2.18 8.979 <0.001
血红蛋白(g/L,±s) 85.73±9.58 80.41±9.13 2.191 0.031
治疗方法[例(%)]     7.196 0.027
套扎术 1(5.88) 7(7.61)    
硬化剂 7(41.18) 65(70.65)    
硬化剂+组织胶 9(52.94) 20(21.74)    
门静脉栓子[例(%)]     4.049 0.044
4(23.53) 44(50.00)    
13(76.47) 44(50.00)    
门静脉内径(mm,±s) 15.18±2.74 15.23±2.75 0.069 0.945
脾静脉内径(mm,±s) 9.04±1.29 9.11±1.47 0.184 0.855
脾脏厚度(mm,±s) 44.14±5.27 43.95±5.35 0.135 0.893
Child-Pugh分级[例(%)]     6.999 0.030
A级 2(11.76) 20(21.74)    
B级 9(52.94) 62(67.39)    
C级 6(35.29) 10(10.87)    
表2 肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者内镜治疗后再出血的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 预测内镜治疗肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者再出血的列线图
图2 列线图模型预测肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者再出血的校准曲线
图3 预测肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血患者再出血的ROC曲线
[1]
刘成环, 刘刚, 甘郑宁, 等. 磁共振FRFSE联合多模态影像学技术评估脾脏Gamna-Gandy小体预测乙型肝炎肝硬化患者并发食管胃底静脉曲张价值研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2025, 28(2): 246-249.
[2]
王薇, 晁霞, 周道颖, 等. 超声内镜检查术对食管-胃底静脉曲张患者食管静脉曲张套扎术治疗效果的评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2023, 29(5): 52-56.
[3]
Iwai S, Akahane T, Takaya H, et al. Ratio of von Willebrand factor to ADAMTS13 is a useful predictor of esophagogastric varices progression after sustained virologic response in patients with hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis[J]. Hepatol Re, 2024, 54(12): 1116-1127.
[4]
Zhang D, Deng J, Guo X, et al. Nomogram model for predicting esophsagogastric varices in hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis [J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 35(3): 342-348.
[5]
中华外科学分会门静脉高压症学组. 肝硬化门静脉高压症食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的诊治共识(2015版)[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(2): 167-170
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会脾及门静脉高压外科学组. 肝硬化门静脉高压症食管,胃底静脉曲张破裂出血诊治专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(12): 7.
[7]
Watanabe T, Tokumoto Y, Ochi H, et al. Clinical factors to predict changes of esophagogastric varices after sustained viral response with direct-acting antiviral therapy[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2025, 60(2): 222-234.
[8]
Zhang S, Liu YD, Chai NL, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early cancers or precancerous lesions of the upper GI tract in cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric varices: 10-year experience from a large tertiary center in China[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2023, 97(6): 1031-1044.
[9]
李瑞妮, 王莎莎, 贾泽博, 等. 聚桂醇和蛇毒血凝酶注射配合内镜下套扎治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化并发EVB患者疗效研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(5): 741-744.
[10]
张明. 肝硬化门静脉血栓形成诊治新进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(1): 11-15.
[11]
Shigefuku R, Iwasa M, Yoshikawa K, et al. A rare case of idiopathic portal hypertension with portopulmonary hypertension occurred following splenectomy with a change in portal hemodynamics[J]. Clin J Gastroenterol, 2025, 18(1): 130-136.
[12]
赵忠乐, 陈红伟, 宋亚华. 肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的影响因素及诊断价值分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2024, 29(3): 327-330.
[13]
赵洋, 王春敏, 李晶, 等. 肝硬化合并腹水患者的发病危险因素分析[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2024, 28(11): 1321-1326.
[14]
胡慧艺, 周智航, 张大志, 等. 优先经颈静脉肝内门体分流术对Child-Pugh B级肝硬化患者再出血率的效果分析[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2024, 44(8): 544-547.
[15]
叶丝陶, 艾英杰, 李星寰, 等. 乙肝肝硬化伴食管胃静脉曲张患者合并门静脉血栓的铁代谢特征改变[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2024, 26(4): 489-493.
[16]
李欣忆, 李娇娇, 孙蔚. 肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后发生显性肝性脑病的列线图预测模型建立及评价[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(8): 1605-1611.
[17]
张静, 吴丹丹, 强丽, 等. 肝硬化患者首次静脉曲张破裂出血列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 四川医学, 2023, 44(4): 372-379.
[18]
Guo C, Liu Z, Fan H, et al. Machine-learning-based plasma metabolomic profiles for predicting long-term complications of cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology, 2025, 81(1): 168-180.
[1] 张俊清, 周秘, 张文军, 谭静, 尹立雪. 射血分数保留肝硬化患者的肝脏硬度与左心室功能超声特征及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 768-776.
[2] 郑佳, 李蕾, 管仁政, 曲政海. 肺炎支原体肺炎患儿发生塑型性支气管炎的危险因素分析及列线图预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(05): 534-543.
[3] 李发英, 马杰, 于国英. 755例慢性丙型肝炎患者临床特征及进展为肝硬化的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 279-287.
[4] 徐世伟, 廖杜荣, 张镐, 叶辉, 陈志平, 雒洪志. 基于一种新炎症-营养指标构建结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 383-389.
[5] 腾鹏, 田景昌, 鄂春翔, 向阳, 田伯宇. 肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术预后列线图模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 645-652.
[6] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[7] 赵俊宇, 林航宇, 李会灵, 王显飞, 游川. 肝癌肝切除术后大量腹水预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 740-747.
[8] 刘燕, 马亦旻. 消化道早癌患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后局部复发预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 576-582.
[9] 田俊超, 冯美静, 王惠惠, 张鸿雁, 刘毅. 抗血小板药物重启时机对消化性溃疡出血合并冠心病患者再出血与心脑血管事件风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 583-589.
[10] 张群青, 吴娟, 王妍. 肝硬化门静脉高压症患者肝脏血流动力学指标与门静脉压力梯度的相关性[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 616-620.
[11] 王俊香, 刘洁, 井春艳. 彩色多普勒超声肝门血流在肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张患者出血风险的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 492-498.
[12] 赵莉, 张敏伟, 郭浩东, 于海侠, 王光明, 李德春. 乳腺X线模型构建列线图预测乳腺癌HR及HER2的表达[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(10): 747-757.
[13] 王超, 张晓会, 李晓帆, 赵海丹. 维持性血液透析患者感染与心脑血管死亡风险的比较及联合预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 675-681.
[14] 于少华, 苏飞, 芦永斌, 袁芳芸, 阚晓燕, 张涛, 侯小明. 基于血清电解质水平构建列线图模型对广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(08): 574-581.
[15] 皇立媛, 浦洁, 王苏贵, 陈婷婷, 朱德慧, 胡雪. 中青年脑卒中患者应激障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 504-512.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?