切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -166. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.02.012

论著

成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术的并发症发生率及危险因素
单子凤1, 罗峪梅2, 郭慧丽1,()   
  1. 1101200 北京市平谷区医院消化内科
    2101200 北京市平谷区医院病案室
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-17 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 郭慧丽

Retrospective analysis of the incidence of complications and exploration of risk factors in endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract of adults

Zifeng Shan1, Yumei Luo2, Huili Guo1,()   

  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Pinggu District Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 101200, China
    2Medical Record Room, Pinggu District Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 101200, China
  • Received:2025-09-17 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Huili Guo
引用本文:

单子凤, 罗峪梅, 郭慧丽. 成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术的并发症发生率及危险因素[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 162-166.

Zifeng Shan, Yumei Luo, Huili Guo. Retrospective analysis of the incidence of complications and exploration of risk factors in endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract of adults[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(02): 162-166.

目的

回顾性分析成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术并发症发生情况,并探讨其危险因素。

方法

纳入2021年3月至2025年3月北京市平谷区医院收治的成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术患者资料进行回顾性分析,其中有并发症患者29例(穿孔8例、出血9例、脓肿7例、溃疡5例),无并发症患者188例。比较2组患者年龄、性别、基础疾病、异物大小与形状、部位、滞留时间、内镜医师经验、辅助器械选择及术前黏膜损伤、手术时间、抗生素使用情况,运用Logistic多因素回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),分析上述因素对成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术并发症发生的预测价值。

结果

两组患者的年龄、合并高血压、异物大小、异物形状、异物部位、滞留时间、术前黏膜损伤方面比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄>48岁、合并高血压、异物大小>22 mm、异物形状为针/鱼刺、滞留时间>16 h、术前黏膜损伤、异物部位为食管上段均为影响成人上消化道尖锐异物术后并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析,年龄>48岁、合并高血压、异物大小>22 mm、异物形状为针/鱼刺、滞留时间>16 h、术前黏膜损伤、异物部位为食管上段等指标联合预测成人上消化道尖锐异物术后并发症的AUC为0.872,其灵敏度和特异性分别为85.10%和83.61%。

结论

成人上消化道尖锐异物内镜下取出术患者并发症与年龄、合并高血压、异物大小、异物形状、异物部位、滞留时间、术前黏膜损伤均存在密切关联,联合监测上述因素能够为并发症预防和干预提供可靠参考。

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the occurrence of complications in endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract of adults and explore its risk factors.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of adult patients who underwent endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper digestive tract at Pinggu District Hospital of Beijing from March 2021 to March 2025. Among them, 29 patients had complications (8 cases of perforation, 9 cases of bleeding, 7 cases of abscess, 5 cases of ulcer), and 188 patients had no complications. The age, gender, underlying diseases, size and shape of foreign bodies, location, retention time, endoscopy physician experience, selection of auxiliary instruments, preoperative mucosal injury, operation time, and antibiotic use of the two groups of patients were compared. Logistic multivariate regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the predictive value of the above factors for the occurrence of complications during endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract of adults.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, combined hypertension, foreign body size, foreign body shape, foreign body location, retention time, and preoperative mucosal injury (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age >48 years old, combined hypertension, foreign body size >22 mm, foreign body shape of needle/fish bone, retention time >16 hours, preoperative mucosal injury, and foreign body location in the upper segment of the esophagus were all independent risk factors affecting postoperative complications of sharp foreign bodies in the upper digestive tract of adults (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the combined AUC of indicators such as age >48 years, combined hypertension, foreign body size >22 mm, foreign body shape of needle/fish bone, retention time >16 hours, preoperative mucosal injury, and foreign body location in the upper segment of the esophagus for predicting postoperative complications of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract of adults was 0.872. Its sensitivity and specificity were 85.10% and 83.61% respectively.

Conclusion

Complications in adult patients undergoing endoscopic removal of sharp foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are closely related to age, combined hypertension, foreign body size, foreign body shape, foreign body location, retention time, and preoperative mucosal injury, combined monitoring of the above factors can provide a reliable reference for the prevention and intervention of complications.

表1 两组成人上消化道尖锐异物患者并发症发生单因素比较
表2 多因素回归分析赋值表
表3 影响成人上消化道尖锐异物术后并发症的多因素回归分析结果
图1 各项危险因素预测成人上消化道尖锐异物术后并发症的ROC曲线
表4 各项危险因素预测成人上消化道尖锐异物术后并发症的效能分析
[1]
林楚芳, 林庆斌, 郑文能.十年间消化道异物流行病学调查及其并发症影响因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志, 2023, 29(9): 49-56.
[2]
Karišik M. FOREIGN BODY ASPIRATION AND INGESTION IN CHILDREN[J].Acta Clin Croat, 2023, 62(Suppl1): 105-112.
[3]]
薛宁, 徐俊杰, 魏绪霞.消化内镜诊治儿童上消化道异物穿孔临床分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志, 2022, 43(2): 117-121.
[4]
Oh YE, Moon HS. Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Foreign Bodies[J]. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res, 2024, 24(1): 24-30.
[5]
Zhou S, Qian Z, Qiang F, et al.A case of foreign body in digestive tract puncturing into the liver[J].Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(7): 1439-1440.
[6]
Emeka CK, Chukwuebuka NO, Tochukwu EJ. Foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract in children: A tertiary hospital experience[J]. Afr J Paediatr Surg, 2023, 20(3): 224-228.
[7]
Wang X, Su S, Chen Y, et al.The removal of foreign body ingestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 1, 182 adult cases[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(6): 502.
[8]
Calini G, Ortolan N, Battistella C, et al.Endoscopic failure for foreign body ingestion and food bolus impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract: an updated analysis in a European tertiary care hospital[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 35(9): 962-967.
[9]
Wu L, Chen XY, Ji D, et al.Foreign body-intestinal canal angle guides management of ingested foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract[J].Abdom Radiol (NY), 2024, 49(11): 3759-3767.
[10]
李闵, 邓芳.儿童消化道内异物614例分析:一项单中心回顾性研究[J].临床儿科杂志, 2025, 43(4): 264-270.
[11]
侯叶廷, 张铭麟, 史伟东, 等.上消化道异物2 619例内镜诊治分析[J].中华全科医师杂志, 2024, 23(5): 469-474.
[12]
Arratibel P, Gil-Lasa I, Cobian J, et al. Incidence and evolution of foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract and its relationship with eosionophilic oesophagitis[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 45(4): 274-281.
[13]
Chen Z, Yin M, Xia P, et al. Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Complications after Endoscopic Foreign Body Removal from the Adult Upper Gastrointestinal Tract[J].Dig Dis Sci, 2024, 69(4): 1361-1371.
[14]
Chiu CC, Huang CY, Chang KM, et al.Learning Curve of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Foreign Body Management for Otorhinolaryngology Residents[J].ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2022, 84(3): 193-199.
[15]
阳玉兰, 喻安永, 谢智慧, 等.上消化道异物嵌顿的临床特点及并发症发生的危险因素分析[J].华西医学, 2022, 37(11): 1630-1635.
[16]
Arratibel P, Gil-Lasa I, Cobian J, et al. Incidence and evolution of foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract and its relationship with eosionophilic oesophagitis[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 45(4): 274-281.
[17]
Monreal AJ, Vanuno DG. A Foreign Body in an Unexpected Place-Ingested Hardware Nails Within the Appendix[J]. Am Surg, 2023, 89(8): 3634-3635.
[18]
Sims JK, Li R, Lovvorn HN 3rd. Digestive Foreign Bodies in Children: Old Problems, New Complexities[J].Adv Surg, 2025, 59(1): 325-339.
[19]
刘军, 朱子莫, 袁靖国, 等.内窥镜治疗上消化道异物病例分析[J].中国医学装备, 2023, 20(10): 177-181
[20]
Ahmed Z, Arif SF, Ong SL, et al.Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Esophageal Foreign Body Removal Is Safe and Efficacious Compared to Conventional Methods[J].Dig Dis Sci, 2023, 68(4): 1411-1425.
[21]
Adeoye PO, Afolabi OA, Omokanye HK, et al.Foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract: time for comprehensive preventive measures [J].Afr Health Sci, 2022, 22(2): 369-376.
[22]
Chen YH, Shomorony A, Drusin MA, et al.Consultations for Foreign Bodies in Aerodigestive Tract: Assessment of Diagnostic Modalities [J]. Laryngoscope, 2023, 133(6): 1361-1366.
[23]
廖红明, 秦亮, 何本超, 等.食管异物术后食管穿孔预测模型建立与验证[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2023, 30(4): 251-256.
[1] 宋志岗, 刘帅, 李颖, 董华兴, 连彦军. 不同入路ISR术用于治疗低位直肠癌患者对围手术期指标及并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 150-153.
[2] 李玮璇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治术主要并发症与处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-114.
[3] 樊伟伟, 许怀利, 杨喜佳. 中间入路与左侧前入路在中老年进展期胃癌腹腔镜根治术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 117-120.
[4] 汝干, 翟春涛, 田昳程, 陈正荣. 腹腔镜下不同手术方式治疗cT1N0M0期胃癌的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 134-137.
[5] 贺智恒, 姚德炯, 孙东方. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后胆瘘影响因素分析及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 175-178.
[6] 必拉里·艾尔肯, 王丹, 李义亮. 腹外疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 108-111.
[7] 宋辉, 朱亮, 于茜. 胰腺癌肝转移临床特征及危险因素[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 73-78.
[8] 张维娜, 潘亚娟, 徐敏. 晚期消化系统癌症手术患者器官/腔隙感染的风险预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 120-124.
[9] 李晨阳, 汪涛, 徐忠瑞, 黄福秀, 李淑玲, 徐衍, 周旋, 赵慧, 张宁宁, 陈超. 急性下消化道出血患者安全出院风险评分的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 156-161.
[10] 临床多学科共识专家小组. 骨盆骨折现代救治专家共识:从现场处理到康复管理(2025)[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 1-16.
[11] 苏克敏, 孙静, 杨烁, 李艳英, 张梅, 刘福朋. 皮质醇水平与节律在2型糖尿病及其并发症中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 66-70.
[12] 陆飞, 邓朗朗, 刘江江, 张煜, 冯伟, 马海涛. 局部进展期食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助免疫联合化疗前后体成分变化与围手术期结局的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 36-48.
[13] 崔明愚, 李小刚, 刘欣, 王丽娟, 刘荧. 老年脑小血管病患者症状性急性皮质下脑微梗死的临床及影像学特征[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 50-56.
[14] 林文广, 刘馨仪, 吴凌峰. 进展性缺血性脑卒中诊疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 77-81.
[15] 王晖, 刘艳娜, 周宝华, 杨琼, 罗永梅. 脑卒中后谵妄非药物干预的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 91-95.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?