切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 222 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.03.006

论著

高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的危险因素及其列线图预测模型构建
韩一梅1, 冯仕川2, 陈志娟1,()   
  1. 1723000 陕西省,汉中市中心医院消化内科
    2723000 陕西省,汉中市中心医院全科医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-02 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 陈志娟

Risk factors for recurrence of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis and construction of a nomogram prediction model

Yimei Han1, Shichuan Feng2, Zhijuan Chen1,()   

  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong 723000, China
    2Department of General Practice, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong 723000, China
  • Received:2025-09-02 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhijuan Chen
引用本文:

韩一梅, 冯仕川, 陈志娟. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的危险因素及其列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 222-228.

Yimei Han, Shichuan Feng, Zhijuan Chen. Risk factors for recurrence of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis and construction of a nomogram prediction model[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(03): 222-228.

目的

分析高脂血症性急性胰腺炎(HLAP)患者复发的危险因素,并基于危险因素构建列线图。

方法

回顾性选择2020年1月至2023年12月于汉中市中心医院就诊的500例HLAP患者,随访至2025年2月28日。根据随访期内复发情况分为未复发组和复发组,比较两组基线资料、实验室指标、慢性病史和HLAP发病信息。采用单因素、多因素logistic回归分析HLAP复发的风险因素,建立列线图预测模型。

结果

未复发组包括325例患者,复发组包括175例患者。多因素Logistic回归分析提示,体重指数(BMI)>28.24 kg/m2OR=3.263)、C反应蛋白(CRP)>44.12 mg/L(OR=9.215)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)>8.93(OR=8.100)、重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)(OR=12.213)、血清钙(Ca)≤2.38 mmol/L(OR=8.574)是HLAP复发的独立危险因素(P<0.05);受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线提示,该预测模型预测HLAP复发的训练集与验证集曲线下面积为0.992、0.961;校准曲线提示,该预测模型预测HLAP复发的训练集与验证集的C指数为0.788、0.813,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度为0.930(P=0.335)、0.930(P=0.628);决策曲线分析(DCA)提示,本模型在训练集、验证集均与极端曲线距离较远。敏感性分析证实,将连续变量以原始形式纳入模型,其预测效能和原模型无显著差异(DeLong检验P>0.05)。

结论

基于BMI、CRP、NLR、SAP、Ca五项危险因素构建的列线图预测模型,经ROC曲线、校准曲线和DCA曲线验证,具有显著的应用价值,补充敏感性分析证实该模型稳健可靠,可产生良好的临床效益。

Objective

To analyze the risk factors for recurrence in patients with hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis (HLAP) and to construct a nomogram based on these factors.

Methods

A total of 500 patients with HLAP treated in Hanzhong Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023 were selected retrospectively and followed up until February 28, 2025. According to the recurrence status during the follow-up period, the patients were divided into non-recurrence group and recurrence group. Baseline data, laboratory indicators, chronic disease history, and HLAP onset information were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for HLAP recurrence, and a nomogram prediction model was established.

Results

The non-recurrence group consisted of 325 patients, while the recurrence group comprised 175 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI) >28.24 kg/m2 (OR=3.263), C-reactive protein (CRP) >44.12 mg/L (OR=9.215), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >8.93 (OR=8.100), severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (OR=12.213), and serum calcium (Ca) ≤2.38 mmol/L (OR=8.574) were independent risk factors for HLAP recurrence (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the area under the curve of this prediction model for HLAP recurrence was 0.992 in the training set and 0.961 in the validation set. The calibration curve indicated that the C-index of the prediction model for HLAP recurrence was 0.788 in the training set and 0.813 in the validation set, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test values were 0.930 (P=0.335) and 0.930 (P=0.628), respectively. The decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested that the model was far from the extreme curves in both the training and validation sets. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that when continuous variables were included in the model in their original form, its predictive performance showed no significant difference from that of the original model (DeLong test P>0.05).

Conclusion

The nomogram prediction model constructed based on the five risk factors (BMI, CRP, NLR, SAP, and Ca) has been validated by ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA curve, demonstrating significant application value. Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirms that the model is robust and reliable, offering promising clinical benefits.

表1 两组高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者单因素分析比较
组别 未复发组(n=325) 复发组(n=175) χ2/t P
性别[例(%)]     0.380 0.538
226(69.54) 117(66.85)    
99(30.46) 58(33.14)    
年龄(岁,±s) 55.63±19.34 57.39±19.66 0.965 0.335
体重指数(kg/m2,±s) 25.49±3.58 28.26±5.53 6.773 <0.001
吸烟史[例(%)]     1.169 0.280
147(45.23) 88(50.29)    
178(54.77) 87(49.71)    
饮酒史[例(%)]     1.798 0.180
156(48.00) 95(54.29)    
169(52.00) 80(45.71)    
血清淀粉酶(U/L,±s) 356.21±80.52 370.27±95.80 1.740 0.082
乳酸脱氢酶(U/L,±s) 186.21±35.44 190.29±37.23 1.206 0.228
血清脂肪酶(U/L,±s) 182.23±32.99 188.57±40.33 1.893 0.059
NLR(±s) 7.26±2.54 9.23±3.07 7.677 <0.001
碱性磷酸酶(U/L,±s) 78.21±13.93 80.21±12.43 1.589 0.113
总胆红素(μmmol/L,±s) 17.83±3.40 18.55±4.72 1.963 0.050
总胆固醇(μmmol/L,±s) 10.58±2.93 10.69±2.20 1.623 0.105
甘油三酯(μmmol/L,±s) 26.31±5.29 27.21±6.93 0.435 0.664
HDL-C(μmmol/L,±s) 0.70±0.24 0.68±0.22 0.915 0.361
LDL-C(μmmol/L,±s) 2.97±0.54 3.03±0.62 1.124 0.261
血清Ca(mmol/L,±s) 2.39±0.67 1.98±0.53 7.000 <0.001
血清Mg(mmol/L,±s) 1.06±0.14 0.93±0.15 9.657 <0.001
C反应蛋白(mg/L,±s) 39.39±7.26 48.21±9.27 11.730 <0.001
高血压[例(%)]     3.619 0.057
92(28.31) 64(36.57)    
233(71.69) 111(63.43)    
糖尿病[例(%)]     1.285 0.257
99(30.46) 62(35.43)    
226(69.54) 113(64.57)    
住院时间(d,±s) 13.26±3.78 13.53±3.50 0.782 0.435
急性胰腺炎严重程度[例(%)]     69.495 <0.001
轻症 172(52.92) 31(17.71)    
中症 106(32.62) 36(20.57)    
重症 97(29.85) 108(61.71)    
表2 logistic回归模型变量赋值
表3 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者复发多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发列线图预测模型注:NLR中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值;BMI体重指数;CRP C反应蛋白;CA血清钙;SAP重症急性胰腺炎
图2 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发预测模型的ROC图
图3 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发预测模型的训练集校准曲线
图4 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发预测模型的验证集校准曲线
图5 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发预测模型的DCA
图6 连续变量模型预测高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的ROC曲线
表4 连续变量多因素Logistic回归分析结果
[1]
王思盼, 张珏, 张珂, 等. 内脏脂肪指数对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者病情严重程度的预测价值[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(4): 453-457.
[2]
钟舒婷, 黄小华, 杜青林, 等. 基于增强CT影像组学预测糖尿病状态下急性胰腺炎复发[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2023, 29(3): 277-282.
[3]
《高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎诊治急诊专家共识》专家组, 潘龙飞, 裴红红, 马岳峰. 高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎诊治急诊专家共识[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(30): 3781-3793.
[4]
杜宇琪. 复发性高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎的临床特征及代谢组学研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2024.
[5]
姚丽莎. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的危险因素分析[D]. 温州: 温州医科大学, 2023.
[6]
刘楚萱, 左佳鑫, 熊屏. 基于超声评分参数及临床指标的列线图鉴别原发性干燥综合征与IgG4相关唾液腺炎[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2025, 45(3): 373-380.
[7]
奇丽娜, 陈平. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎反复发作的病因及防治策略[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(10): 2109-2115.
[8]
Yan B, Fu HR, Shu YX. Study on recurrence risk factors of hyperlip-idemic acute pancreatitis[J]. Chin J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 32(9): 1029-1033.
[9]
郭凯明, 伊娜, 赵振平, 等. 中国成人BMI和腹型肥胖与T2DM发病关系的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2023, 27(11): 1342-1349.
[10]
Hansen SEJ, Madsen CM, Varbo A, et al. Body mass index, triglycerides, and risk of acute pancreatitis: A population-based study of 118000 individuals[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020, 105(1): dgz059.
[11]
颜博, 付泓锐, 舒义雄. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发危险因素的研究[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2023, 32(9): 1029-1033.
[12]
Chen X, Lin Z, Chen Y, et al. C-reactive protein/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study assessing disease severity[J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(6): 3223-3229.
[13]
Halaseh SA, Kostalas M, Kopec C, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Early Predictor of Complication and Mortality Outcomes in Individuals With Acute Pancreatitis at a UK District General Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(9): e29782.
[14]
李帅, 周晶, 罗贵贤, 等. 首发和复发急性高甘油三酯血症胰腺炎临床特征比较的全国多中心临床研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(5): 703-711.
[15]
冯子钦, 陈卫昌. 急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数与血清钙比值对急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2023, 43(12): 800-805.
[16]
Haq IU, Daud M, Khan MA, et al. Impact of Serum Triglyceride Levels on Severity and Outcomes in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(8): e65928.
[17]
Wen S, Zhang Y, Zhao G, et al. Development and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Recurrence of Acute Pancreatitis in Combined Hypertriglyceridemia[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2024, 69(9): 3426-3435.
[18]
符国丹, 朱峰锋, 白雨卉, 等. 汉防己甲素通过抑制钙超载对小鼠重症急性胰腺炎的防治作用[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2023, 39(6): 1043-1052.
[19]
黄晓东, 黄贤伟, 杨成彬, 等. 复发性高脂血症性急性胰腺炎列线图预测模型[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1346-1349.
[20]
Zhou W, Liu Q, Wang Z, et al. Analysis of the clinical profile and treatment efficiency of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2024, 23(1): 70.
[21]
Peng T, Peng X, Huang M, et al. Serum calcium as an indicator of persistent organ failure in acute pancreatitis[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2017, 35(7): 978-982.
[22]
Qin R, Liu Y, Ding R, et al. Efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis in hyperlipidemia acute pancreatitis: a retrospective observational study[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2025, 24(1): 27.
[23]
Liu Y, Cheng JP, Zhao XL. The effect of serum triglyceride levels and different lipid-lowering methods on the prognosis of hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis: a single-center 12-year retrospective study by propensity score matching[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2024, 59(7): 843-851.
[1] 邬明嫄, 李婷婷, 鲜欣欣, 罗朝阳, 杨青, 卢漫. 基于超微血流成像血管指数的列线图模型诊断肢端黑色素瘤引流区域淋巴结的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 276-282.
[2] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[3] 李志超, 叶梓绎, 辛万鹏. TACE在肝细胞癌根治性切除术后MVI阳性患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 252-256.
[4] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的疗效及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 257-260.
[5] 朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁. 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.
[6] 贺智恒, 姚德炯, 孙东方. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后胆瘘影响因素分析及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 175-178.
[7] 夏天, 肖恒军, 冯泽佳, 罗杰珩, 崔宇斌, 王华, 李腾成, 狄金明. 以持续性血精为首发症状的原发性精囊腺癌一例报告并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 346-351.
[8] 王书翰, 任振, 刘虎, 吴昊, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.
[9] 叶金宝, 梁声强, 马建新, 林小强, 张海森. 小野寺预后营养指数对肝癌复发预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 372-378.
[10] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 林泽润, 林宏焕, 易长昱, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 基于术前影像肿瘤负荷评分的模型对单发肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 379-385.
[11] 张文华, 陈宇凡, 林松茸, 江艺, 江哲龙. 肝癌肿瘤出芽与患者临床病理特征关系及其对切除术后复发影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 386-391.
[12] 邢颖, 王峰. 基于机器学习构建肝切除术后肝衰竭预测列线图模型及其预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 190-196.
[13] 吴杰嵘, 严庆, 胡健垣, 陈焕伟. 复发性肝细胞癌再次手术切除与射频消融临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 211-218.
[14] 杨宁, 张立翱, 李仁君, 金水. 非遗传性结直肠息肉病患者的临床特征及息肉复发的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 168-174.
[15] 张婧萱, 郭佳星, 李紫红, 陈怡颖, 乔媛, 宝莹娜. 多线治疗失败后31例复发转移性结直肠癌局部挽救性放射治疗的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 206-211.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?