切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 56 -60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2021.02.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

内镜下扩张联合注射博来霉素治疗食管手术后吻合口良性狭窄的安全性和有效性
李兆滔1,(), 苏沛珠1, 崔西玉1   
  1. 1. 528000 佛山市第一人民医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-16 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李兆滔
  • 基金资助:
    佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(2017AB002051)

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for anastomotic benign stricture after esophageal surgery

Zhaotao Li1,(), Peizhu Su1, Xiyu Cui1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2020-07-16 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhaotao Li
引用本文:

李兆滔, 苏沛珠, 崔西玉. 内镜下扩张联合注射博来霉素治疗食管手术后吻合口良性狭窄的安全性和有效性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 56-60.

Zhaotao Li, Peizhu Su, Xiyu Cui. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for anastomotic benign stricture after esophageal surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(02): 56-60.

目的

分析内镜下扩张联合注射博来霉素治疗食管手术后吻合口良性狭窄的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2019年6月佛山市第一人民医院收治的食管手术后吻合口良性狭窄的55例患者。其中25例患者接受内镜下扩张联合注射博来霉素治疗(内镜下扩张联合博来霉素组),30例患者接受单纯内镜下扩张治疗(单纯内镜下扩张组)。比较两组患者缓解食管狭窄需要的时间、扩张相关的治疗费用、1年无狭窄生存时间、并发症发生情况。

结果

两组患者均顺利完成了内镜下治疗,治疗后短期内都达到了内镜和临床缓解。两组患者术后均未出现严重并发症,且两组患者术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义[8.0%(2/25) vs 6.7%(2/30),χ2=0.046,P=0.83]。在1年的随访时间内,内镜下扩张联合博来霉素组患者无狭窄生存时间长于单纯内镜下扩张组患者[(11.1±0.4)个月vs (3.9±0.2)个月],前者需要达到食管狭窄缓解的扩张次数更少[1(1,2)次vs 3(3,4)次],费用更低[5791.2(4987.4,9974.8)元vs 16084.0(14036.1,19094.0)元],且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=54.322,Z=7.103、6.653,P均<0.01)。

结论

内镜下扩张联合注射博来霉素治疗食管手术后吻合口良性狭窄的疗效优于单纯内镜下扩张,可获得更长的无狭窄生存时间,并减少扩张次数。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for anastomotic benign stricture after esophageal surgery.

Methods

A total of 55 patients with anastomotic benign stricture after esophageal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-five patients received endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection (endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin group), and 30 patients received endoscopic dilation treatment alone (endoscopic dilation group). The time needed to alleviate esophageal stenosis, cost of dilation-related treatment, stenosis-free survival and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

Both groups of patients successfully completed endoscopic therapy and achieved endoscopic and clinical remission in a short period of time after treatment. There were no serious postoperative complications in the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups [8.0% (2/25) vs. 6.7% (2/30), χ2=0.046, P=0.83]. During the 1-year follow-up, patients in the endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin group had a longer survival time without stenosis than that in the endoscopic dilation group [(11.1±0.4) months vs. (3.9±0.2) months]. Moreover, the median numbers of dilation required to resolve esophageal stenosis [1 (1, 2) vs. 3 (3, 4)] and dilation-related cost [$5791.2 (4987.4, 9974.8) vs. $16084.0 (14036.1, 19094.0)] were both significantly lower in the endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin group than those in the endoscopic dilation group. There were statistically significant differences (χ2=54.322, Z=7.103, 6.653, all P<0.01).

Conclusion

Endoscopic dilation combined with bleomycin injection for benign anastomotic stenosis after esophageal surgery is more effective than endoscopic dilatation alone, which can prolong the stenosis -free survival time and reduce the number of dilation.

图1 内镜下食管扩张联合博来霉素注射操作过程。图A显示扩张前食管;图B显示内镜下局部注射博来霉素;图C显示内镜下扩张联合博来霉素注射后的食管
表1 两组患者一般临床资料比较
图2 两组患者1年无狭窄生存曲线比较。内镜下扩张联合博来霉素组患者1年无狭窄生存时间显著长于单纯扩张组患者[(11.1±0.4)个月 vs (3.9±0.2)个月,χ2=54.322,P<0.01]
表2 两组患者治疗有效性及安全性比较
1
Absalon MJ, Wu W, Kozarich JW, et al. Sequence-specific double-strand cleavage of DNA by Fe-bleomycin. Mechanism and dynamics [J]. Biochemistry, 1995, 34(6): 2076-2086.
2
Payapvipapong K, Niumpradit N, Piriyanand C, et al. The treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with intralesional bleomycin in skin of color [J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2015, 14(1): 83-90.
3
Shi Q, Ju H, Yao LQ, et al. Risk factors for postoperative stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma [J]. Endoscopy, 2014, 46(8): 640-644.
4
Ravich WJ. Endoscopic Management of Benign Esophageal Strictures [J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2017, 19(10): 50.
5
Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 70(5): 860-866.
6
Bravi I, Ravizza D, Fiori G, et al. Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures:a single-center experience [J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(1): 229-232.
7
Mizusawa T, Kobayashi M, Terai S. Radial incision and cutting for refractory benign esophageal stricture [J]. Dig Endosc, 2019, 31(2): e46-e47.
8
Wu PY, Wang F, Wu ZC, et al. Comparison of esophageal stent placement versus endoscopic incision method for treatment of refractory esophageal anastomotic stricture [J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2019, 8(4): 462-468.
9
Shumeiko O, Yoshida M, Ono H. Safe method of steroid injection following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for postoperative stricture prevention [J]. Dig Endosc, 2019, 31(6): e118-e119.
10
Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Motoori M, et al. Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Followed By Intralesional Steroid Injection for Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2018, 113(10): 1468-1474.
11
Kate CAT, Vlot J, Sloots CEJ, et al. The effect of intralesional steroid injections on esophageal strictures and the child as whole: A case series [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2020, 55(4): 646-650.
12
Ley D, Bridenne M, Gottrand F, et al. Efficacy and safety of the local application of mitomycin C to recurrent oesophageal strictures in children [J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2019, 69(5): 528-532.
13
Divarci E, Kilic O, Dokumcu Z, et al. Topical Mitomycin C Application Is Effective Even in Esophageal Strictures Resistant to Dilatation Therapy in Children [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2017, 27(5): e96-e100.
14
龚振华,周峰,姚建,等. 基于网络Meta分析的瘢痕药物预防及治疗评价 [J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版, 2017, 12(3): 176-181.
15
中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会脉管性疾病学组. 平阳霉素治疗脉管性疾病规范 [J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 9(1): 68-69.
16
Liu L, Wang J, Zhao L, et al. Mo1680 Topical Bleomycin Injection Combined With Endosopic Dilation For Managing Benighn Anastomotic Stricture After Rectal Surgery [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 89(6): AB518-AB519.
[1] 张锐, 沈雅芳, 安肖霞, 林双. 黄芩苷对博来霉素诱导肺纤维化小鼠的保护作用及其机制[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 49-54.
[2] 白明辉. 局部注射复方倍他米松联合类人胶原蛋白瘢痕修复硅凝胶治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效评价[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(01): 55-58.
[3] 陈非凡, 赵红川. 肝移植术后胆道并发症研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 232-238.
[4] 周辉年, 焦作义, 杜志兴, 李玉民. 肝总动脉变异肝移植术后并发胆管吻合口狭窄一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 112-114.
[5] 周志华, 刘小彭, 吴杰英, 吴思锋. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后自动结扎夹移位的原因分析及防治对策[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 262-265.
[6] 王向, 张永杰. 胆管损伤修复后再狭窄原因与处理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 131-136.
[7] 刘壮壮, 汤东, 王道荣. 直肠癌NOSES术后并发复杂并发症一例报告[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 418-420.
[8] 汪冠聪, 姚开源, 沈祈远, 杨愈刚, 薛吓娟, 林水杰, 郭银枞. 直肠癌术后吻合口良性狭窄80例诊治分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 396-402.
[9] 王玉柳明, 王贵玉. 结直肠癌术后良性吻合口狭窄的成因及治疗进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 345-348.
[10] 刘双, 陈晓, 杨士明, 周敬强. 经皮肝I期胆道造瘘联合胆道镜治疗胰十二指肠切除术后继发胆管结石[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 20-25.
[11] 高堃, 李惠, 张勇, 刘克云, 周传国. 125I放射性粒子条联合胆管金属支架植入术在恶性胆肠吻合口狭窄中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 165-170.
[12] 万巍, 周卫忠, 刘圣, 周春高, 叶伟, 施海彬. 支架置入与引流管置入治疗恶性胆肠吻合口狭窄的对比研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 160-165.
[13] 邱敏霞, 孔灿灿, 陈文妹, 毛苇. 内镜下环周切开术与球囊扩张术治疗食管吻合口良性狭窄临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 27-30.
[14] 张海静, 胡海清. 食管吻合口良性狭窄治疗方法的临床进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(01): 27-31.
[15] 杨渝鑫, 苏瑜琛, 李春光, 李志刚. 食管术后良性吻合口狭窄的危险因素:来自早期内镜评估的结果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 86-97.
阅读次数
全文


摘要