切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 317 -319. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2022.05.016

临床护理

心理疏导对初次行电子胃镜检查患者的情绪及成功率的影响
刘梦真1,()   
  1. 1. 441300 湖北省,随州市中心医院消化内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-17 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 刘梦真

Effect of psychological counseling on emotion and success rate of patients undergoing electronic gastroscopy for the first time

Mengzhen Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Suizhou Central Hospital, Hubei Province, Suizhou 441300, China
  • Received:2022-03-17 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Mengzhen Liu
引用本文:

刘梦真. 心理疏导对初次行电子胃镜检查患者的情绪及成功率的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 317-319.

Mengzhen Liu. Effect of psychological counseling on emotion and success rate of patients undergoing electronic gastroscopy for the first time[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(05): 317-319.

目的

分析心理疏导对初次行电子胃镜检查患者的情绪及检查成功率的影响。

方法

随机选取2021年5月1日至2021年5月30日在随州市中心医院消化内镜中心初次行普通电子胃镜检查的患者共174例,随机分为观察组和对照组各87例。对照组给予常规护理,常规护理包括健康宣教、指导患者如何配合、体位。观察组在常规护理的基础上,在操作前中后均给予心理疏导。比较两组患者的情绪、不良反应发生情况、检查成功率的影响。

结果

观察组中患者紧张、拒绝的情绪明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组中患者不良反应出现的程度明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组中患者的检查成功率98.85%,高于对照组的90.80%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对初次行电子胃镜检查的患者进行心理疏导后能明显缓解患者害怕紧张情绪,使患者在检查过程中慢慢适应,从而更好的配合检查,提高患者检查成功率。

Objective

To analyze the effect of psychological counseling on emotion and success rate of patients undergoing electronic gastroscopy for the first time.

Methods

A total of 174 patients who underwent general electronic gastroscopy for the first time in the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Suizhou Central Hospital from May 1, 2021 to May 30, 2021 were randomly selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, including 87 patients in each group.The control group was only given routine nursing care, which included health education and guidance on how to cooperate and body position.On the basis of routine nursing, the observation group was given psychological counseling before, during and after operation.Finally, the emotion, the occurrence of adverse reactions and the success rate of examination were compared between the two groups.

Results

The nervousness and rejection of the patients in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group, with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The degree of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The examination success rate of patients in the observation group was 98.85%, which was higher than 90.80% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Psychological counseling for patients undergoing electronic gastroscopy for the first time can significantly relieve the patient′s fear and nervousness, so that the patient can slowly adapt to the examination process, so as to better cooperate with the examination, which can improve the success rate of the patient′s examination.

1
McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J.Patients′experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—a systematic review of the literature[J].Patient Educ Couns201286(2):137-146.
2
Darvas K, Tarjányi M, Molnár Z, et al.Sedation for ambulatory endoscopy[J]. Acta Chir Hung199938(2):142-146.
3
刘娟.分析消化道内镜检查的心理护理效果[J/OL].世界最新医学信息文摘202020(51):282-284.
4
中华医学会麻醉学分会,中华医学会消化内镜学分会.中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉的专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志201430(9):920-927.
5
Liu Yuan Yuan, Liu Yan Qun, Petrini Marcia A.Effect of Information of patients,Coping Style on Pregastroscopy Anxiety[J].Gastroenterol Nurs201841(1):47-58.
6
周勤,邱敏.心理干预对电子胃镜检查患者焦虑症的影响[J].中国内镜杂志201723(1):52-55.
7
于跃芹,王为荣,李萌.心理护理干预在行电子胃镜检查患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志202026(13):85-87.
8
Marco Lauriola, Manuela Tomai, Rossella Palma, et al.Intolerance of Uncertainty and Anxiety-Related Dispositions Predict Pain During Upper Endoscopy[J].Front Psychol201910:1112.
9
张雅宁.胃镜检查中护患有效沟通的重要性[J].中国医药指南201513(31):296-297.
10
Dossa F, Medeiros B, Keng C, et al.Propofol versus midazolam with or without short-acting opioids for sedation in colonoscopy:a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety,satisfaction,and efciency outcomes[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy202091(5):1015-1026.
11
Fahima Dossa, Olivia Megetto, Mafo Yakubu, et al.Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy a systematic review of recommendations[J].BMC Gastroenterol202121(1):22.
12
Chacko L, Macaron C, Burke CA.Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women[J].Dig Dis Sci201560(3):698-710.
13
Stefano Pontone, Marco Lauriola, Rossella Palma, et al.Do difficulties in emotional processing predict procedure pain and shape the patient′s colonoscopy experience? [J].BMJ Open202212(2):e050544.
14
Jones RM, Devers KJ, Kuzel AJ, et al.Patient-Reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening:a mixed-methods analysis[J].Am J Prev Med201038(5):508-516.
[1] 王青青, 耿翠芝, 苏晓雨, 彭玉晓, 秦明祎, 刘风侠. 乳腺癌芳香化酶抑制剂相关肌肉骨骼不良反应的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 243-249.
[2] 丁璐月, 刘炜, 魏昂, 张瑞东, 王天有, 刘霖霖, 臧博伦, 王亚峰, 郭明发. 贝林妥欧单抗治疗儿童复发/难治CD19+急性B淋巴细胞白血病临床观察[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 194-201.
[3] 李振华, 解宝江, 易为, 李丽, 卫雅娴, 周明书, 伊诺. 82例孕产妇对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控认知的心理干预及常态化疫情防控应对要点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 173-179.
[4] 李志伟, 向琪, 彭胜男, 郭玲, 孙贱根, 杨川. 右美托咪定与曲马多分别复合罗哌卡因在全麻下结肠癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 182-185.
[5] 陈滔, 罗洪, 周进军. 老年食管癌单纯放疗及同期放化疗患者急性不良反应影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 405-407.
[6] 陈瑜, 尤良顺, 孟海涛, 杨敏. 嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗多发性骨髓瘤新进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 313-320.
[7] 季媛, 魏巴金. NLRP3炎性小体在器官移植不良反应发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 308-312.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[10] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[11] 徐洪宇, 何亚爽. 羟考酮与氢吗啡酮用于胃癌根治术后镇痛的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 312-316.
[12] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[13] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[14] 王昊, 明倩文, 王斌, 卢太坤, 张海宁. 利奈唑胺致黑毛舌的临床诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 254-260.
[15] 廖安琪, 王玫, 廖远泉. 达格列净诱发糖尿病患者血尿发生的临床诊断特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 169-172.
阅读次数
全文


摘要