切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 167 -171. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2023.03.008

综述

新型生物材料在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用
刘晗, 李惠, 朱宇新, 于淼, 李莞盈, 王爽, 狄育竹, 宁丹丹, 曲波()   
  1. 150086 哈尔滨医科大学第二临床医学院;150086 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院消化内科
    150086 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 曲波
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省博士后科研启动基金(LBH-Q20111)

Application of novel biomaterials in endoscopic submucosal dissection

Han Liu, Hui Li, Yuxin Zhu, Miao Yu, Wanying Li, Shuang Wang, Yuzhu Di, Dandan Ning, Bo Qu()   

  1. Second Clinical College of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
    Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
  • Received:2022-11-28 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Bo Qu
引用本文:

刘晗, 李惠, 朱宇新, 于淼, 李莞盈, 王爽, 狄育竹, 宁丹丹, 曲波. 新型生物材料在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 167-171.

Han Liu, Hui Li, Yuxin Zhu, Miao Yu, Wanying Li, Shuang Wang, Yuzhu Di, Dandan Ning, Bo Qu. Application of novel biomaterials in endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(03): 167-171.

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)被广泛应用于消化道肿瘤的早期诊断及治疗,但ESD会造成医源性溃疡,并可能存在出血和穿孔等并发症,现有的术后治疗措施,如抑酸、黏膜保护药物的应用及术中电凝、止血夹止血都存在着一定的局限性。因此,需要先进的创面管理措施来促进ESD术后愈合及预防并发症,本文就近年来新型生物材料在ESD术后的应用研究及其机制做一综述,以期促进进一步的相关研究。

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)is widely used in the early diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumors.However, ESD may cause iatrogenic ulcers and be accompanied by complications such as bleeding and perforation.The existing treatment measures after ESD, such as the application of the antacids and the mucosa protectors have certain limitations, and there are also shortcomings of electrocoagulation and hemostatic clips.Therefore, advanced wound management measures are needed to promote postoperative wound healing and prevent complications.We review the application and mechanism of novel biomaterials in ESD according to literatures for the past few years, in order to promote the further related research.

表1 新型材料的类型及特点
图1 新型材料覆盖创面及创面愈合过程
1
Kinami S, Funaki H, Fujita H, et al. Local resection of the stomach for gastric cancer [J]. Surg Today, 201747(6):651-659.
2
Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Hirasawa T, et al. Ichiro Oda for J-WEB/EGC group. Short-term outcomes of multicenter prospective cohort study of gastric endoscopic resection: ′Real-world evidence′ in Japan [J]. Dig Endosc, 201931(1):30-39.
3
Basford PJ, George R, Nixon E, et al. Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding [J]. Surg Endosc201428(5):1594-1600.
4
Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T,et al. Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video) [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 200766(5):966-973.
5
Maeng JH, Bang BW, Lee E,et al. Endoscopic application of EGF-chitosan hydrogel for precipitated healing of GI peptic ulcers and mucosectomy-induced ulcers [J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 201425(2):573-582.
6
Lim JH, Kim SG, Choi J, et al. Risk factors of delayed ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. Surg Endosc201529(12):3666-3673.
7
Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N,et al. Helicobacter pylori status and the extent of gastric atrophy do not affect ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 200621(10):1586-1589.
8
Kobayashi M, Takeuchi M, Hashimoto S, et al. Contributing factors to gastric ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection including the promoting effect of rebamipide [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 201257(1):119-126.
9
Oh TH, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. Degree of healing and healing-associated factors of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers after pantoprazole therapy for 4 weeks [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 200954(7):1494-1499.
10
Ye BD, Cheon JH, Choi KD,et al. Omeprazole may be superior to famotidine in the management of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 200624(5):837-843.
11
Ohya TR, Endo H, Kawagoe K, et al. A prospective randomized trial of lafutidine vs rabeprazole on post-ESD gastric ulcers [J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 20102(1):36-40.
12
Horikawa Y, Mimori N, Mizutamari H,et al. Proper muscle layer damage affects ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. Dig Endosc201527(7):747-753.
13
Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Goto O, et al. Prospective single-arm trial of two-week rabeprazole treatment for ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. Dig Endosc201224(2):110-116.
14
Fujiwara S, Morita Y, Toyonaga T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rebamipide plus rabeprazole for the healing of artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. J Gastroenterol, 201146(5):595-602.
15
Leaper DJ. Silver dressings: their role in wound management [J]. Int Wound J, 20063(4):282-294.
16
Lam SK, Ching CK. Sucralfate in clinical practice [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol19949(4):401-411.
17
Alonci G, Fiorini F, Riva P, et al. Injectable Hybrid Hydrogels, with Cell-Responsive Degradation, for Tumor Resection [J]. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 20181(5):1301-1310.
18
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M,et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition) [J]. Dig Endosc, 202133(1):4-20.
19
Tsuda Y, Ishihara M, Amako M, et al. Photocrosslinkable chitosan hydrogel can prevent bone formation in both rat skull and fibula bone defects [J]. Artif Organs, 200933(1):74-77.
20
Muzzarelli R, Tarsi R, Filippini O, et al. Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 199034(10):2019-2023.
21
Rfbds A, Fcbds A, Ackb B, et al. Biopolymer-based films and membranes as wound dressings [J]. Biopolymer Membranes and Films, 2020:165-194.
22
Jiménez-Gómez CP, Cecilia JA. Chitosan: A Natural Biopolymer with a Wide and Varied Range of Applications [J]. Molecules, 202025(17):3981.
23
Yoo IK, Kim K, Song G, Koh MY, Lee MS, Yeniova Lee H, Cho JY. Endoscopic application of mussel-inspired phenolic chitosan as a hemostatic agent for gastrointestinal bleeding: A preclinical study in a heparinized pig model [J]. PLoS One, 202116(5):e0251145.
24
Peng X, Xia X, Xu X, et al. Ultrafast self-gelling powder mediates robust wet adhesion to promote healing of gastrointestinal perforations [J]. Sci Adv, 20217(23):eabe8739.
25
Regnier A, Cazalot G, Cantaloube B. Topical treatment of non-healing corneal epithelial ulcers in dogs with aminocaproic acid[J]. Vet Rec, 2005157(17):510-513.
26
Phadke A, Zhang C, Arman B,et al. Rapid self-healing hydrogels [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012109(12):4383-4388.
27
He J, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Ren F,et al. Injectable Self-Healing Adhesive pH-Responsive Hydrogels Accelerate Gastric Hemostasis and Wound Healing [J]. Nanomicro Lett, 202113(1):80.
28
Uraoka T, Ochiai Y, Fujimoto A,et al. A novel fully synthetic and self-assembled peptide solution for endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer in the stomach [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 201683(6):1259-1264.
29
Katsuyama S, Miyazaki Y, Kobayashi S, et al. Novel, infection-free, advanced hemostatic material: physical properties and preclinical efficacy [J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 202029(5):283-292.
30
Yoshida M, Goto N, Kawaguchi M, et al. Initial clinical trial of a novel hemostat, TDM-621, in the endoscopic treatments of the gastric tumors [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 201429 Suppl 4:77-79.
31
Aoki S, Sakata Y, Shimoda R, et al. High-density collagen patch prevents stricture after endoscopic circumferential submucosal dissection of the esophagus: a porcine model [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 201785(5):1076-1085.
32
Narita T, Yunoki S, Ohyabu Y, et al. In situ gelation properties of a collagen-genipin sol with a potential for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers [J]. Med Devices (Auckl), 20169:429-439.
33
Uraoka T, Yunoki S, Kinoshita S, et al. Novel temperature-responsive, biodegradable and injectable collagen sol for the endoscopic closure of colonic perforation holes: Animal study (with videos) [J]. Dig Endosc, 202133(4):616-620.
34
Kwon CI, Kim G, Ko KH, et al. Bio-sheet graft therapy for artificial gastric ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: an animal feasibility study [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 201581(4):989-996.
35
Zhao LM, Gong M, Wang R, et al. Accelerating ESD-induced gastric ulcer healing using a pH-responsive polyurethane/small intestinal submucosa hydrogel delivered by endoscopic catheter [J]. Regen Biomater, 20218(1):rbaa056.
36
Francesko A, Petkova P, Tzanov T. Hydrogel Dressings for Advanced Wound Management [J]. Curr Med Chem, 201825(41):5782-5797.
37
Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, et al. Burn wound infections [J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 200619(2):403-434.
38
Matica MA, Aachmann FL, Tøndervik A, et al. Chitosan as a Wound Dressing Starting Material: Antimicrobial Properties and Mode of Action [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 201920(23):5889.
39
Savard T, Beaulieu C, Boucher I, et al. Antimicrobial action of hydrolyzed chitosan against spoilage yeasts and lactic acid bacteria of fermented vegetables [J]. J Food Prot, 200265(5):828-833.
40
Shepherd J, Sarker P, Rimmer S, et al. Hyperbranched poly(NIPAM) polymers modified with antibiotics for the reduction of bacterial burden in infected human tissue engineered skin [J]. Biomaterials, 201132(1):258-267.
41
Tian J, Wong KK, Ho CM, et al. Topical delivery of silver nanoparticles promotes wound healing [J]. Chem Med Chem, 20072(1):129-136.
42
Jiang Y, Zhao W, Xu S, Wei J, et al. Bioinspired design of mannose-decorated globular lysine dendrimers promotes diabetic wound healing by orchestrating appropriate macrophage polarization [J]. Biomaterials, 2022280:121323.
43
Francesko A, Soares da Costa D, Reis RL, et al. Functional biopolymer-based matrices for modulation of chronic wound enzyme activities [J]. Acta Biomater, 20139(2):5216-5225.
[1] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[2] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[9] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[12] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[13] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
阅读次数
全文


摘要