切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 220 -223. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2023.04.006

论著

超声造影与上腹部增强磁共振检查对肝血管瘤患者的诊断效能对比
张娟, 庄嘉艳(), 杨莹美, 蒋盛荣, 苏艳, 刘振兴   
  1. 678000 云南省,保山市人民医院超声科
    678000 云南省,保山市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科
    678000 云南省,保山市人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-17 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 庄嘉艳

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance in patients with hepatic hemangioma

Juan Zhang, Jiayan Zhuang(), Yingmei Yang, Shengrong Jiang, Yan Su, Zhenxing Liu   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Baoshan People′s Hospital, Baoshan 678000, China
    Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Baoshan People′s Hospital, Baoshan 678000, China
    Department of Radiology, Baoshan People′s Hospital, Baoshan 678000, China
  • Received:2023-03-17 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiayan Zhuang
引用本文:

张娟, 庄嘉艳, 杨莹美, 蒋盛荣, 苏艳, 刘振兴. 超声造影与上腹部增强磁共振检查对肝血管瘤患者的诊断效能对比[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 220-223.

Juan Zhang, Jiayan Zhuang, Yingmei Yang, Shengrong Jiang, Yan Su, Zhenxing Liu. Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance in patients with hepatic hemangioma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(04): 220-223.

目的

分析超声造影(CEUS)与上腹部增强MRI扫描对肝血管瘤患者的诊断效能。

方法

选择2021年1月至2022年10月保山市人民医院收治的86例肝血管瘤患者为对象,以患者手术病理学结果为诊断金标准,对比CEUS和上腹部MRI增强扫描对肝血管瘤的诊断效能。

结果

86例肝血管瘤患者,CEUS检测符合例数80例,诊断符合率为93.02%,增强MRI扫描检测符合例数75例,诊断符合率为87.21%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CEUS和增强MRI扫描分别对≥4 mm直径的肝血管瘤的阳性检出率为90.91%(30/33)和100.00%(33/33),两组检测方式差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);CEUS和增强MRI扫描分别对<4 mm直径的肝血管瘤的阳性检出率为94.34%(50/53)和79.25%(42/53),CEUS检出率高于增强MRI扫描(P<0.05)。CEUS:动脉期表现为斑点状、结节状向心性增强,未见中心强化,门脉期病灶向心性填充,病灶回声相较于周围组织升高,延迟期相较于周围肝实质呈缓慢式填充。增强MRI扫描:患者肝脏部位可见低密度肿块形阴影,病灶外界面较为光滑。对比增强扫描T1、T2以及ADC图片分析发现,静脉期患者肿瘤增强范围呈扩大、扩展变化,剩余两个时相均表现为结节状强化。

结论

CEUS与增强MRI扫描在肝血管瘤患者的诊断中均具有良好的诊断效能,但CEUS在较小直径的肝血管瘤检测率相对更高,将CEUS与增强MRI扫描结合有利于增加肝血管瘤疾病的诊断准确率。

Objective

To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance(MRI)scanning in patients with hepatic hemangioma.

Methods

A total of 86 patients with hepatic hemangioma admitted from January 2021 to October 2022 were selected as subjects.The surgical pathology results of patients were used as the diagnostic gold standard to compare the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and enhanced upper abdominal MRI plain scan for hepatic hemangioma.

Results

Among the 86 patients with hepatic hemangioma, 80 cases met by CEUS, with a diagnostic coincidence rate of 93.02%; 75 cases met by upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning, with a diagnostic coincidence rate of 87.21%.There was no significant difference in diagnostic coincidence rate between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning(93.02% vs.87.21%, P>0.05). The positive rate of CEUS and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning for hepatic hemangioma with≥4 mm diameter was 90.91%(30/33)and 100.00%(33/33)respectively, with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). The positive rates of CEUS and upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning for hepatic hemangioma with<4 mm diameter were 94.34%(50/53)and 79.25%(42/53)respectively.The positive rate of CEUS was higher than that of upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning(P<0.05). CEUS: The arterial stage showed spot-like and nodular centripetal enhancement without central enhancement; the portal stage showed centripetal filling, the lesion echo increased compared to the surrounding tissue; the delayed stage showed slow filling compared to the surrounding liver parenchyma.Upper abdominal enhanced magnetic resonance scanning: low density mass shadow could be seen in the liver of the patient, and the external surface of the lesion was smooth.Compared with T1, T2 and ADC images, it was found that the scope of tumor enhancement in venous stage was enlarged and expanded, and the remaining two phases showed nodular enhancement.

Conclusion

Both CEUS and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scanning have good diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma patients, but CEUS has a relatively higher detection rate in small-diameter hepatic hemangioma.CEUS and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scanning in the upper abdomen can be used in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma clinically, which is conducive to increasing the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic hemangioma disease.

表1 超声造影与上腹部增强磁共振扫描对不同直径的肝血管瘤检测率对比
图1 超声造影显示病灶边缘呈点状、斑点状及粗条状所形成的环状增强征象;门脉期从末梢部向中心部扩散,呈现向中心部之乳头状突出填充征象
1
乔斐,郑宵阳,赵丽.64排螺旋CT三期增强扫描测定肝血管瘤容积价值分析[J].实用肝脏病杂志202225(3):427-430.
2
Wang JShi ADing X,et al.Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for atypical hepatic hemangioma[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol202252(1):98-100.
3
Aziz HBrown ZJBaghdadi A,et al.A Comprehensive Review of Hepatic Hemangioma Management[J].J Gastrointest Surg202226(9):1998-2007.
4
张丽,白静,张磊,等.CT检查在彩超引导下肝血管瘤介入术中的临床应用价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202220(7):95-97.
5
宋琦,吴晓丽,董毅,等.肝脏多发血管瘤彩超、MSCT增强影像特征及鉴别诊断研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202220(7):92-94.
6
Erickson LAGupta STorres-Mora J.Hepatic Hemangioma[J].Mayo Clin Proc202398(3):489-491.
7
张玉佩,李小虎,汪飞,等.非对比增强定量T1 mapping技术对肝血管瘤、肝细胞癌及肝转移瘤的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志202129(12):1216-1221.
8
Li LXu LWang P,et al.Advantages of laparoscopic hepatic hemangioma surgery in quality of life:a prospective study[J].Surg Endosc202236(12):8967-8974.
9
周正,刘玮.肝血管瘤、肝细胞癌和肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤超声造影特点观察[J].实用肝脏病杂志202124(6):911-914.
10
Jia KYin WWang F,et al.Transarterial embolization for rare spontaneous subacute intratumoral hemorrhage of hepatic hemangioma:a case report and literature review[J].Transl Cancer Res202211(10):3919-3926.
11
王晶,张洁,赵静.超声造影联合声触诊组织量化技术鉴别肝血管瘤与肝细胞癌价值研究[J].实用肝脏病杂志202225(4):575-578.
12
陈凡,陈春,刘颖,等.超声造影参数联合声触诊组织量化技术对肝细胞癌及肝血管瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J].中国医学装备202219(10):79-82.
13
Bouknani NRami AKassimi M,et al.Exophytic hepatic hemangioma:a case report[J].Radiol Case Rep202217(9):3367-3369.
14
张丽,白静,张磊,王志欣.CT检查在彩超引导下肝血管瘤介入术中的临床应用价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202220(7):95-97.
15
高祥瑞,刘红岩,张淮,等.高场磁共振多b值弥散加权成像鉴别诊断肝血管瘤与肝细胞癌价值探讨[J].实用肝脏病杂志202326(1):104-107.
16
吴旋音,田果,曹红翠,等.Sonazoid超声造影与增强磁共振成像对肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值比较[J].中华超声影像学杂志202130(6):494-499.
17
王超,王启荣,王向涛,等.常规二维超声、超声造影及MSCT对小肝癌早期诊断价值对比[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202220(3):80-82.
18
Counil CAbenojar EPerera R,et al.Extrusion:A New Method for Rapid Formulation of High-Yield,Monodisperse Nanobubbles[J].Small202218(24):2200810.
19
Wang FNumata KNihonmatsu H,et al.Added Value of Ultrasound-Based Multimodal Imaging to Diagnose Hepatic Sclerosed Hemangioma before Biopsy and Resection[J].Diagnostics(Basel)202212(11):2818.
20
敬容,刘剑.对比超声造影与上腹部增强CT检查对肝血管瘤的诊断效能[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202119(3):90-91,158.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[5] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[6] 罗迎吉星, 隗瑞丽, 王天晓, 黄笳, 徐力, 孙永亮, 杨志英. 开放、腔镜、机器人辅助肝血管瘤剥除术治疗巨大肝血管瘤对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 277-283.
[7] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[8] 张红君, 郑博文, 廖梅, 任杰. 超声及超声造影在肝移植术后上腹部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 562-567.
[9] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
[10] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[11] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
[12] 黄宏山, 陈成彩. 经淋巴管超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[13] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.
[14] 黎东城, 陈涛, 李新春, 周嘉璇, 包盈莹, 俞家熙, 万齐. MR 弥散加权成像与HRCT 在肺部病变良恶性鉴别中的诊断效能对比[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 249-253.
[15] 史宛瑞, 崔立刚. 颈动脉一过性血管周围炎综合征的影像学诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-519.
阅读次数
全文
3
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 3

  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 2 1
  比例 67% 33%

摘要
42
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 42
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 5 37
  比例 12% 88%