切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 373 -377. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2024.04.017

论著

顺阿曲库铵不同用药方案对腹腔镜胃切除术患者麻醉质量的影响
丁金路1,(), 徐宗雪1, 程敏1   
  1. 1. 232000 安徽省,淮南东方医院集团总医院 安徽理工大学附属医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-07 出版日期:2024-08-01
  • 通信作者: 丁金路

Effects of different cis-atracurium regimens on the quality of anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy

Jinlu Ding1,(), Zongxue Xu1, Min Cheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Huainan East Hospital Group-Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232000, China
  • Received:2024-02-07 Published:2024-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinlu Ding
引用本文:

丁金路, 徐宗雪, 程敏. 顺阿曲库铵不同用药方案对腹腔镜胃切除术患者麻醉质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 373-377.

Jinlu Ding, Zongxue Xu, Min Cheng. Effects of different cis-atracurium regimens on the quality of anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(04): 373-377.

目的

分析顺阿曲库铵不同用药方案对腹腔镜胃切除术患者术后苏醒、应激及早期恢复质量的影响。

方法

选取淮南东方医院集团总医院2021年1月至2023年6月拟行腹腔镜胃切除术治疗的80例患者,随机分为间断输注组(n=40)、持续输注组(n=40),2组均采用相同麻醉诱导方案,间断输注组术中每当T1恢复至10%时给予0.03 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵,持续输注组术中首次T1恢复至10%时启动顺阿曲库铵1.4 μg/(kg·min)持续静脉输注。对比2组术中肌松维持和恢复情况、术后苏醒质量、围手术期应激指标变化,并通过术后首次排气时间、胃肠功能恢复时间等指标评估2组早期恢复质量。

结果

间断输注组TOF恢复至75%时间、恢复指数、总用药量、平均给药速度均高于持续输注组(P<0.05)。间断输注组自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间高于持续输注组(P<0.05)。2组气腹后即刻、气腹后30 min、手术结束时肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)和皮质醇(Cor)均较麻醉诱导前升高(P<0.05);同时点组间应激指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。间断输注组胃肠功能恢复时间高于持续输注组(P<0.05),术后不良反应发生率高于持续输注组(P<0.05)。

结论

相较于间断输注,持续输注顺阿曲库铵能够在不影响麻醉效果、不加剧应激反应的前提下,促进术后肌松恢复和苏醒、提高早期恢复质量、降低不良反应发生风险。

Objective

To analyze the effects of different cis-atracurium regimens on postoperative recovery, stress and early recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods

A total of 80 patients who were treated by laparoscopic gastrectomy in General Hospital of Huainan East Hospital Group from January 2021 to June 2023 were selected randomly divided into intermittent infusion group (n=40) and continuous infusion group (n=40). Both groups adopted the same anesthesia induction scheme. The intermittent infusion group was given 0.03 mg/kg cis-atracurium whenever T1 recovered to 10% during operation, and in the continuous infusion group, 1.4 μg/(kg·min) continuous intravenous infusion of cis-atracurium was initiated when T1 recovered to 10% at the first time. The maintenance and recovery of muscle relaxation during operation, the quality of postoperative recovery and the changes of perioperative stress indexes were compared between the two groups, and the early rehabilitation quality of the two groups was evaluated by the first postoperative exhaust time and gastrointestinal function recovery time.

Results

The recovery time of TOF to 75%, recovery index, total dosage and average administration speed in the intermittent infusion group were higher than those in the continuous infusion group (P<0.05). The recovery time of spontaneous respiration and extubation time in the intermittent infusion group were longer than those in the continuous infusion group (P<0.05). The levels of epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE) and cortisol (Cor) in both groups were higher immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 30 min after pneumoperitoneum and at the end of operation compared with before anesthesia induction (P<0.05). At the same time, there was no statistically significant difference in stress indexes between the two groups (P>0.05). The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in the intermittent infusion group was longer than that in the continuous infusion group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in the intermittent infusion group was higher than that in the continuous infusion group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with intermittent infusion, continuous infusion of cis-atracurium can promote postoperative muscle relaxation recovery and recovery, improve the quality of early recovery and reduce the risk of adverse reactions without affecting the anesthetic effect and aggravating stress response.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者术中肌松维持和恢复情况比较(±s
表3 2组患者术后苏醒质量比较
表4 2组患者应激指标变化比较(ng/mL,±s
表5 2组患者术后恢复质量比较(h,±s
表6 2组患者不良反应发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Ding X, Chen D, Che J, et al. Penehyclidine hydrochloride for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2023, 23(1): 135.
[2]
Zeng M, Li J, Zheng T, et al. Electropress Needle Stimulation for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(9): 2831-2840.
[3]
徐峰, 李查兵. 肺保护性通气策略对腹腔镜手术患者顺式阿曲库铵作用时间的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(3): 301-303.
[4]
Maqbool MS, Alam M, Draz MU, et al. Anaesthesia Concern in High-Risk Cases Under-Going Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J]. JBUMDC, 2021, 11(4): 179-183.
[5]
Ali MGM, Ragab ASM, Diab AAHA. The Beneficial Effects of Adding Magnesium Sulphate to General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy[J]. Int J Med Arts, 2021, 3(1): 989-904.
[6]
蒋宇, 程磊, 邓鑫, 等. 深度肌松对腹腔镜结直肠癌病人术后康复的影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(11): 1521-1526.
[7]
Zhang C, Huang D, Zeng W, et al. Effect of additional equipotent fentanyl or sufentanil administration on recovery profiles during propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022, 22(1): 127.
[8]
Chen YX, Du L, Wang LN, et al. Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Systemic Inflammation and Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. World J Surg, 2023, 47(2): 500-509.
[9]
吴丽莉, 季磊, 陈素娥. 顺式阿曲库铵闭环靶控输注与持续输注对胆囊切除术病人MAP, HR, SpO2及肌松药物用量的影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(9): 1233-1236, 1240.
[10]
An G, Wang G, Zhao B, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022, 22(1): 241.
[11]
Tang Y, Wang T, Yang L, et al. Acupuncture for post-operative cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Acupunct Med, 2021, 39(5): 423-431.
[12]
任红, 张淑芳, 齐贺彬, 等. 小剂量艾司氯胺酮对老年患者腹腔镜结肠癌手术中血流动力学,应激反应及术后恢复质量的影响[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2023, 21(7): 33-38.
[13]
Xue Q, Chu Z, Zhu J, et al. Analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial[J]. Pain Ther, 2022, 11(2): 613-626.
[14]
杨晨, 高娜, 卢锡华. 右美托咪定联合布托啡诺用于腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的临床观察[J]. 中国药房, 2020, 31(22): 2762-2767.
[15]
Zhao X, Xue Q, Dong L, et al. Effects of Peripheral Neural Blocks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Pilot Study on Cognitive Functions in Severe Obese Patients[J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(1): 129-138.
[16]
吴亚南, 韩锐. 3种羟考酮给药方案在腹腔镜手术后的应用效果及安全性比较[J]. 医药导报, 2020, 39(5): 662-665.
[17]
金曼, 云军. 硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学,组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(11): 92-96.
[18]
Jalali SM, Bahri MH, Yazd SMM, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain management and surgery side effects in laparoscopic bariatric surgeries[J]. Langenbeck Arch Surg, 2022, 407(2): 549-557.
[1] 孙鸿坤, 艾虹, 陈正. 内质网应激介导的牙周炎骨改建失衡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 211-218.
[2] 李嘉兴, 孙乙文, 李文星. NLRP3炎性小体在急性胰腺炎中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 300-304.
[3] 代莉, 郭华静, 邓恢伟. 镇痛-伤害性刺激指数指导下无阿片类药物麻醉对腔镜下甲状腺手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 282-286.
[4] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[5] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[6] 张翼翔, 马明, 田金龙, 杨珊珊, 尚程程, 张景欣. 腹腔镜肝叶切除联合胆道镜取石治疗肝内胆管结石的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 381-384.
[7] 丁佳宝, 梁晓辉, 武敬维, 张福. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术在腹股沟嵌顿斜疝患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 543-547.
[8] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[9] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[10] 杜霞, 马梦青, 曹长春. 造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤的发病机制及干预靶点研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 279-282.
[11] 李佳曦, 刘子源, 李学民. 二甲双胍对年龄相关性白内障影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 252-256.
[12] 李京, 牛博, 刘晓蓓, 魏新雪, 黄荣. circ-SESN2 沉默靶向调控miRNA-23a-5p/ULK1 在神经细胞氧化应激损伤中的作用机制研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 263-272.
[13] 冯铭, 孙洪涛. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的颅内压监测与管理[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 248-253.
[14] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[15] 黄镪, 孙金梅, 韩燕飞, 张拥波. 脑源性与非脑源性疾病所致应激性溃疡相关胃肠道出血的影响因素及临床预后差异:一项回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 309-316.
阅读次数
全文


摘要