切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 415 -421. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.05.005

论著

食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图预测模型的构建
曹佩佩, 叶峰, 丁静†()   
  1. 210029 南京,江苏省人民医院(南京医科大学第一附属医院)内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-28 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 丁静
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省第十五批"六大人才高峰"高层次人才选拔培养资助项目(WSW-003)

Construction of a nomogram prediction model for electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors

Peipei Cao, Feng Ye, Jing Ding†()   

  1. Endoscopy Center, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2025-07-28 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jing Ding
引用本文:

曹佩佩, 叶峰, 丁静. 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 415-421.

Peipei Cao, Feng Ye, Jing Ding. Construction of a nomogram prediction model for electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(05): 415-421.

目的

探讨食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后电凝综合征(PEECS)的影响因素,构建列线图预测模型并验证。

方法

回顾性选择2019年1月至2024年1月江苏省人民医院收治的食管肿瘤患者1336例为研究对象,收集患者性别、肿瘤位置、病理分型等临床资料,以7∶3比例将患者随机分为建模组和验证组,比较两组患者临床资料;采用建模组患者临床资料,以是否发生PEECS为因变量,进行单因素和多因素分析,基于多因素分析结果,构建列线图模型,并对模型的区分度、预测准确性、拟合度及临床效用进行验证。

结果

1336例患者中,135例发生PEECS,发生率为10.10%。基于建模组患者临床资料,单因素分析结果显示,非PEECS和PEECS患者的性别、病理分型、肿瘤性质、术中出血、糖尿病、年龄、肿瘤直径、手术时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素分析结果显示,性别(OR=3.228,95% CI 1.521~6.851)、糖尿病(OR=7.666,95% CI 1.614~36.400)、肿瘤直径(OR=1.240,95% CI 1.167~1.317)、手术时间(OR=1.185,95% CI 1.142~1.230)均为食管肿瘤患者PEECS的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于建模组多因素分析结果构建列线图模型,ROC曲线分析显示,AUC=0.954(95% CI=0.930~0.979);Hosmer-Lemeshow检验χ2=3.678(P=0.885)。DCA曲线和CIC分析显示,风险阈值范围在0.0~1.0时,使用该模型预测食管肿瘤PEECS,可获得较高的正向净收益,且使用该模型可较准确地预测食管肿瘤是否发生PEECS。

结论

本研究构建列线图模型对食管肿瘤PEECS的区分度良好,预测准确性较高,具有较好的临床效用,可为食管肿瘤患者PEECS的早期干预提供参考依据。

Objective

To explore the influencing factors of post endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) in esophageal tumors, construct a nomogram prediction model, and validate it.

Methods

A total of 1 336 patients with esophageal tumor admitted to Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to January 2024 were selected as the study objects. Clinical data such as gender, tumor location and pathological classification of patients were collected. Patients were randomly divided into modeling group and validation group at a ratio of 7∶3, and clinical data of patients in the two groups were compared. The clinical data of patients in the modeling group were used, and the occurrence of PEECS was taken as the dependent variable to conduct univariate and multi-factor analysis. Based on the results of multi-factor analysis, the nomogram model was constructed, and the differentiation, prediction accuracy, fit degree and clinical effectiveness of the model were verified.

Results

Among 1 336 patients, 135 developed PEECS, with an incidence rate of 10.10%. Based on the clinical data of patients in the modeling group, the results of single factor analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between non PEECS and PEECS patients in gender, pathological classification, tumor nature, intraoperative bleeding, diabetes, age, tumor diameter, and operation time (P<0.05); Multivariate analysis showed that gender (OR=3.228, 95% CI: 1.521-6.851), diabetes (OR=7.666, 95% CI: 1.614-36.400), tumor diameter (OR=1.240, 95% CI: 1.167-1.317), and operation time (OR=1.185, 95% CI: 1.142-1.230) were all independent risk factors for PEECS in patients with esophageal tumors (P<0.05). A nomogram graphical model was constructed based on the results of the multifactorial analysis of the modeling group, and the results of the ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC=0.954 (95% CI: 0.930-0.979); the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that χ2=3.678 (P=0.885). The results of the DCA curves and the CIC analyses showed that, with the risk thresholds in the range of 0.0 to 1.0, the use of the model to predict PEECS in esophageal tumors resulted in a high positive net benefit, and the use of the model was more accurate in predicting whether PEECS occurred in esophageal tumors.

Conclusion

This study constructs a nomogram model with good discrimination and high prediction accuracy for PEECS in esophageal tumors, which has good clinical efficacy and can provide reference for early intervention of PEECS in esophageal tumor patients.

图1 样本纳入流程图
表1 建模组和验证组食管肿瘤患者临床资料比较
表2 建模组食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征的单因素分析
表3 建模组食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征的多因素分析
图2 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图模型注:PEECS电凝综合征
图3 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图模型的ROC曲线 3A表示建模组;3B表示验证组  图4 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图模型的校准曲线 4A表示建模组;4B表示验证集
图5 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图模型的DCA曲线 5A表示建模组;5B表示验证集  图6 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图模型的CIC曲线 6A表示建模组;6B表示验证集
[1]
王苒霖, 包郁, 张真铭. 早期食管癌和癌前病变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的预防研究进展[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2021, 34(4): 365-372.
[2]
Wang HY, Zeng X, Bai SY, et al. The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating early oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2020, 102(9): 702-711.
[3]
Qiu J, Ouyang Q, Zhang Y, et al. Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome: a clinical overview[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 16(11-12): 1079-1087.
[4]
陈霞, 夏迪. 早期食管癌患者ESD术后食管狭窄发生的危险因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2020, 35(9): 1478-1480, 1484.
[5]
刘洋, 雷思雨, 魏宁, 等. 人源性纤维蛋白胶对食管病变内镜黏膜剥离术后并发症的防治效果分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2021, 38(11): 882-887.
[6]
Misumi Y, Nonaka K. Prevention and Management of Complications and Education in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(11): 2511.
[7]
Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer[J]. Dig Endosc, 2020, 32(4): 452-493.
[8]
Bao Y, Li Z, Li Y, et al. Recent Advances of Biomedical Materials for Prevention of Post-ESD Esophageal Stricture[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 9: 792929.
[9]
谭川川, 谭华梁, 俞赟丰, 等. 结直肠病变内镜下黏膜剥离术后电凝综合征危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2022, 27(8): 999-1005.
[10]
Kim SJ, Kim SY, Lee J. Prognosis and risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum. Large cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(8): 6243-6249.
[11]
高永祥, 张晋昕. Logistic回归分析的样本量确定[J]. 循证医学, 2018, 18(2): 122-124.
[12]
Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, et al. Features of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasm[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31(3): 615-620.
[13]
国家卫生健康委医学伦理专家委员会办公室, 中国医院协会. 涉及人的临床研究伦理审查委员会建设指南(2023版)[Z]. 2023年6月28日.
[14]
中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(4): 315-409.
[15]
《中国高血压防治指南》修订委员会. 中国高血压防治指南2018年修订版[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2019, 19(1): 1-44.
[16]
Kimura H, Yabuuchi Y, Notsu A, et al. Features of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome for early gastric neoplasm[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 36(11): 3164-3169.
[17]
Yamaguchi H, Fukuzawa M, Kawai T, et al. Predictive Factors of Postendoscopic Submucosal Dissection Electrocoagulation Syndrome and the Utility of Computed Tomography Scan after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection[J]. Digestion, 2020, 101(5): 579-589.
[18]
Ma DW, Youn YH, Jung DH, et al. Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(10): 1144-1151.
[19]
Steingrímsdóttir ÓA, Landmark T, Macfarlane GJ, et al. Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Pain, 2017, 158(11): 2092-2107.
[20]
Seno SI, Shimazu H, Kogure E, et al. Factors Affecting and Adjustments for Sex Differences in Current Perception Threshold With Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Subjects[J]. Neuromodulation, 2019, 22(5): 573-579.
[21]
Athnaiel O, Cantillo S, Paredes S, et al. The Role of Sex Hormones in Pain-Related Conditions[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(3): 1866.
[22]
Failla MD, Beach PA, Atalla S, et al. Gender Differences in Pain Threshold, Unpleasantness, and Descending Pain Modulatory Activation Across the Adult Life Span: A Cross Sectional Study[J]. J Pain, 2024, 25(4): 1059-1069.
[23]
张晓妙, 魏琳, 卢乐. 2型糖尿病患者营养状况筛查及营养不良相关因素分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2021, 28(5): 605-607.
[24]
徐晓巧, 许芬, 陈姜妙. 胰岛素联合个体化营养治疗妊娠期糖尿病的临床效果及对患者免疫水平的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(14): 2542-2546.
[25]
Fujita I, Toyokawa T, Matsueda K, et al. Association between CT-Diagnosed Pneumonia and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasms[J]. Digestion, 2016, 94(1): 37-43.
[26]
Lee SP, Sung IK, Kim JH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2017, 86(2): 349-357. e2.
[27]
Mannen K, Tsunada S, Hara M, et al. Risk factors for complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric tumors: analysis of 478 lesions[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2010, 45(1): 30-36.
[1] 邬明嫄, 李婷婷, 鲜欣欣, 罗朝阳, 杨青, 卢漫. 基于超微血流成像血管指数的列线图模型诊断肢端黑色素瘤引流区域淋巴结的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 276-282.
[2] 周文考, 张佳坡, 黄培培, 潘艺梅, 朱琳, 李诗睿, 孙慧敏. 多种机器学习算法比较下急性左心衰竭患者住院期间死亡风险预测模型的构建与外部验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 198-207.
[3] 陈进敏, 陆远强. 急诊手术患者术后28 d死亡风险预测列线图模型的开发与验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 208-214.
[4] 李琳, 庞乐, 潘霞, 朱磊, 王桂子, 刘梅. 汉中社区老年人口腔衰弱与躯体衰弱的横断面关联分析及风险评估模型构建[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 217-224.
[5] 江伟东, 陈博. 早发性可切除胃癌的临床病理特征及预后列线图模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 230-237.
[6] 罗文勇, 黄文龙, 阮沁桐, 蔡莹, 王欣, 吴柱国, 王利玲, 于海兵. 甲状腺癌术后并发低钙血症的发病风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 257-264.
[7] 夏明宇, 刘光昊, 孙倩男, 刘宾, 王道荣. 基于炎症与营养指标的早发型直肠癌患者预后列线图的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 468-473.
[8] 李若隐, 罗义, 张雪琳, 雷李凤, 李思丽. MDSCs相关基因在乳腺癌中表达特征分析与风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 366-373.
[9] 王平, 郝天骄, 陈兴宇, 翟俊, 朱文伟, 陈季松. 急性坏疽性胆囊炎临床风险预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 760-767.
[10] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 林泽润, 林宏焕, 易长昱, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 基于术前影像肿瘤负荷评分的模型对单发肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 379-385.
[11] 许丹, 孙现新, 于海丽. 幽门螺杆菌感染与早期胃癌CYP2C19、CD14基因多态性的关系及对内镜黏膜下剥离术后短期复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 302-307.
[12] 韩一梅, 冯仕川, 陈志娟. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎复发的危险因素及其列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 222-228.
[13] 方钟杰, 罗倩, 邵国丰. Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后低氧血症风险列线图模型构建及验证应用[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 129-135.
[14] 郭彦峰, 冯雪, 苗咪, 程晓芸, 常伟. 急性肛周脓肿术后并发肛瘘早期风险列线图的构建与内部验证[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 141-146.
[15] 陈洋, 于书琪. 孕产妇难治性产后出血风险列线图的探索性构建与初步验证[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 173-178.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?