切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 410 -414. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.05.004

论著

门静脉充血指数与脾静脉血流动力学参数在肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张风险评估中的临床应用
邹培, 鲁琳†()   
  1. 712000 陕西咸阳,陕西省核工业二一五医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-09 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 鲁琳

Clinical application of portal venous congestion index and splenic vein hemodynamic parameters in risk assessment of esophageal and gastric fundus varices in liver cirrhosis

Pei Zou, Lin Lu†()   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, NO. 215th Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry, Xianyang 712000, China
  • Received:2026-03-09 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Lin Lu
引用本文:

邹培, 鲁琳. 门静脉充血指数与脾静脉血流动力学参数在肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张风险评估中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 410-414.

Pei Zou, Lin Lu. Clinical application of portal venous congestion index and splenic vein hemodynamic parameters in risk assessment of esophageal and gastric fundus varices in liver cirrhosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(05): 410-414.

目的

探讨彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)检测门静脉充血指数(PV-CI)及脾静脉血流动力学参数[脾静脉主干内径(SVD)、脾静脉平均血流速度(SVV)、脾静脉血流量(SVQ)]在肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张(EGFV)风险评估中的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析陕西省核工业二一五医院2022年3月至2025年3月收治的70例肝硬化患者临床资料,患者均行CDUS检查测定PV-CI、SVD、SVV及SVQ,行胃镜检查明确是否存在EGFV,并评估EGFV程度。根据胃镜结果分为EGFV组(n=42)与无EGFV组(n=28),EGFV组按曲张程度分为轻度组(n=15)、中度组(n=17)、重度组(n=10)。随访12个月记录EGFV组中食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血(EVB)情况,分为出血组(n=25)与未出血组(n=17)。对比各组参数差异,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析各参数及联合对EVB的评估效能。

结果

EGFV组PV-CI、SVD、SVQ均显著高于无EGFV组,SVV显著低于无EGFV组(P<0.05);随EGFV程度加重,PV-CI、SVD、SVQ逐渐升高,SVV逐渐降低,重度组与轻、中度组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);出血组PV-CI、SVD、SVQ均显著高于无EGFV组,SVV显著低于未出血组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,PV-CI、SVD、SVQ、SVV联合评估EVB的曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度均显著高于各指标单独检测(P<0.05)。

结论

CDUS检测的PV-CI及脾静脉血流动力学参数与肝硬化EGFV发生、严重程度及EVB风险密切相关,联合评估可提高EGFV风险预测效能,为临床提供无创、便捷的评估参考依据。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) detection of portal vein congestion index (PV-CI) and splenic vein hemodynamic parameters [main splenic vein diameter (SVD), mean splenic vein velocity (SVV), and splenic vein blood flow volume (SVQ)] in the risk assessment of esophageal and gastric fundus varices (EGFV) in liver cirrhosis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 70 patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to NO. 215th Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry from March 2022 to March 2025. All underwent CDUS examination to measure PV-CI, SVD, SVV, and SVQ, and gastroscopy was performed to confirm the presence of EGFV and assess its severity. Based on endoscopic findings, patients were categorized into an EGFV group (n=42) and a non-EGFV group (n=28), the EGFV group was further subdivided by variceal severity into mild group (n=15), moderate group (n=17), and severe group (n=10). The EGFV group underwent 12-month follow-up to record esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (EVB), categorizing patients into bleeding group (n=25) and non-bleeding group (n=17). Differences in parameters across groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of individual parameters and combined assessment in predicting EVB.

Results

The PV-CI, SVD and SVQ in the EGFV group were significantly higher than those in the non-EGFV group, and the SVV was significantly lower than that in the non-EGFV group (P<0.05); the aggravation of EGFV degree, PV-CI, SVD and SVQ gradually increased, while SVV gradually decreased, there were statistically significant differences between the severe group and the mild and moderate groups (P<0.05); the PV-CI, SVD and SVQ in the bleeding group were significantly higher than those in the non-EGFV group, and the SVV was significantly lower than that in the non-bleeding group (P<0.05); the ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of the combined assessment of EVB by PV-CI, SVD, SVQ and SVV were significantly higher than those detected separately by each index (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The PV-CI and splenic venous hemodynamic parameters detected by CDUS are closely related to the occurrence, severity and EVB risk of liver cirrhosis EGFV, the combined assessment can improve the predictive efficiency of EGFV risk and provide a non-invasive and convenient assessment reference basis for clinical practice.

表1 两组肝硬化患者PV-CI、脾静脉血流动力学参数比较(±s)
表2 不同食管胃底静脉曲张程度患者PV-CI、脾静脉血流动力学参数比较(±s)
表3 出血与未出血食管胃底静脉曲张患者PV-CI、脾静脉血流动力学参数比较(±s)
图1 PV-CI、脾静脉血流动力学参数对肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血的风险评估价值ROC曲线分析注:PV-CI门静脉充血指数;SVD脾静脉主干内径;SVV脾静脉平均血流速度;SVQ脾静脉血流量
表4 PV-CI、脾静脉血流动力学参数对肝硬化食管胃曲张静脉破裂出血的风险评估价值
[1]
Park MK, Lee YB. Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal and Gastric Variceal Bleeding: Focused on 2019 KASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis[J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2021, 78(3): 152-160.
[2]
Fu S, Chen D, Zhang Z, et al. Predictive Value of Spectral Computed Tomography Parameters in Esophageal Variceal Rupture and Bleeding in Cirrhosis[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2023, 34(4): 339-345.
[3]
Singh S, Chandan S, Vinayek R, et al. Comprehensive approach to esophageal variceal bleeding: From prevention to treatment[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2024, 30(43): 4602-4608.
[4]
Sohal A, Chaudhry H, Dhaliwal A, et al. Gender differences in esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States[J]. Ann Med, 2022, 54(1): 2115-2122.
[5]
信亮亮, 温智. 2D-SWE技术联合FIB-4和血清VEGF水平评估乙型肝炎肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张价值研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(5): 737-740.
[6]
孟明明, 宋清坤, 杨帆, 等. 肝硬化门静脉高压患者肝内静脉-静脉侧支分流影响肝静脉压力梯度与门静脉压力梯度的一致性研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(6): 414-419.
[7]
陈思艳, 郭道宁, 邹晓攀, 等. 彩色多普勒超声评估肝硬化门静脉高压症患者TIPS术后支架功能研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(6): 899-902.
[8]
王文栋, 梁茂全, 刘玉岩. 经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合部分脾动脉栓塞术治疗肝硬化并发门脉高压症患者门静脉血流动力学变化研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2025, 28(1): 120-123.
[9]
中华医学会肝病学分会. 肝硬化诊治指南[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2019, 27(11): 846-865.
[10]
中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会消化病学分会, 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治指南[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1029-1043.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会脾及门静脉高压外科学组. 肝硬化门静脉高压症食管、胃底静脉曲张破裂出血诊治专家共识(2025版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(3): 271-280.
[12]
Zuckerman MJ, Elhanafi S, Mendoza Ladd A. Endoscopic Treatment of Esophageal Varices[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2022, 26(1): 21-37.
[13]
Jobe K, Henry Z. Endoscopic Treatment of Acute Esophageal and Gastric Variceal Bleeding[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2024, 34(2): 249-261.
[14]
程静, 徐路, 彭素琼. 肝血流超声参数联合外周血vWF-Ag对肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 肝脏, 2020, 25(3): 260-263.
[15]
刘欢, 陈鹏, 蒯文涛, 等. 肝脏硬度测定、血小板计数/脾厚比值和脾静脉直径预测肝硬化并发食管静脉曲张价值研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(6): 867-870.
[16]
董立萍, 车福健, 张丽. 彩超检测血流动力学对原发性肝癌合并门静脉高压及术后复发的临床评估价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2022, 37(8): 1327-1330.
[17]
赵小利, 秦博, 李东风, 等. 乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管静脉曲张患者超声检测肝脏血流参数和红细胞分布宽度与淋巴细胞比值变化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(4): 528-531.
[18]
刘玉华, 张源, 郭家婷. 肝脏超声血流参数联合肝脾硬度检测预测乙型肝炎肝硬化并发食管静脉曲张破裂出血价值研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2025, 28(3): 414-417.
[19]
刘水澎, 张国顺. 彩色多普勒超声检测门静脉、脾静脉血流动力学在肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张患者中的临床应用研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2023, 27(4): 436-439.
[20]
沈晓丽, 张超学, 马芳, 等. CDFI下门脉系统血流动力学改变与肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血的相关性分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2023, 34(2): 118-122, 126.
[1] 郭慧, 孔琦, 程芸, 张思然. 经颅多普勒超声脑血流动力学参数对前循环小动脉闭塞型脑卒中短期预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(03): 236-243.
[2] 刘涛, 冯蓓, 李晓勇. 肝静脉压力梯度对TIPS与EVL治疗肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张出血临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 331-336.
[3] 李海红, 尚克磊, 韩文. 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚在小儿腹腔镜斜疝疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 428-433.
[4] 郑宇, 邱少凡, 宋春义, 张翔宇, 王佳, 马少卫. 不同腹腔镜手术对老年男性复发性腹股沟疝的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 307-312.
[5] 孟璐, 张欢欢, 孔婧, 疏玲玲, 吴晓叶, 胡友洋. 环泊酚与丙泊酚用于胸腔镜肺癌肺叶切除术麻醉诱导的血流动力学及术后恢复比较[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 424-430.
[6] 王孟龙. 门静脉高压症的治疗选择策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 523-528.
[7] 汪祖宇, 刘笑安, 王汉譞, 吕少诚, 郎韧. 终末期良性肝病肝移植术后顽固性脾亢影响因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 606-611.
[8] 胡田, 侯志敏, 武翊纶. 彩色多普勒血流成像与剪切波弹性成像在非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊断及纤维化分期中的价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 319-324.
[9] 桂红, 马博, 王煜, 刘晓晖. Alvarado评分、超声特征联合血清CXCR3、RANTES水平在儿童阑尾炎诊断及分型中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 341-346.
[10] 刘笑, 赵连晖, 王广川, 张春清. 他汀类药物在肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 374-379.
[11] 刘海龙, 唐敏娟, 高悦. 肝血流超声参数联合血清内皮素1、核因子κB对肝硬化患者食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 216-221.
[12] 郭建华, 郭黎黎, 吕莉. 高频超声联合彩色多普勒超声对肠套叠肠壁血流状态与复位成功率的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 236-242.
[13] 廖伟芋, 王仕斌, 赵建利. 纳布啡复合地佐辛多模式镇痛对结肠癌根治术患者镇痛效果及术后认知功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 262-267.
[14] 魏立国, 翟浩宇, 张英立. 瑞芬太尼联合咪达唑仑静脉麻醉对内镜黏膜下剥离术及内镜下黏膜切除术操作的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 268-273.
[15] 张思远, 宋晓微, 王丽君, 范玉华, 武剑. 人工智能赋能脑小血管病的血流动力学评估:研究进展与临床转化[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 327-333.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?