切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 188 -192. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2024.02.017

临床护理

定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响
高建平1,(), 王辉1, 王淑萍2   
  1. 1. 102600 北京市大兴区人民医院胸外科
    2. 102600 北京市大兴区人民医院重症监护室
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-17 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 高建平
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项项目(2020-3-7122)

Effect of regular home follow-up on dietary recovery function after thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery

jianping Gao1,(), Hui Wang1, Shuping Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijing 102600, China
    2. Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijing 102600, China
  • Received:2023-09-17 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: jianping Gao
引用本文:

高建平, 王辉, 王淑萍. 定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.

jianping Gao, Hui Wang, Shuping Wang. Effect of regular home follow-up on dietary recovery function after thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.

目的

探讨基于互联网、电话支持和定期家庭随访对食管癌术后胃肠道功能恢复效果的影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入于2019年1月至2022年1月北京市大兴区人民医院接受胸腔镜食管癌根治术的患者120例,随机将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组各60例。对照组在术后采用常规随访方式,出院时由责任医师和护士告知饮食添加原则、食物选择和门诊随访时间。观察组患者在接受常规随访的基础上,出院后由医生和护士组成随访小组,定期进行一对一电话指导生活方式和饮食注意事项,并每月进行家庭随访一次;责任医师和护士在微信群里定期进行食管癌术后健康知识宣教,指导患者恢复和饮食注意事项,并定时回答患者提出的术后康复问题。6个月后门诊随访两组患者焦虑自评量表评分(SAS)和抑郁自评量表评分(SDS)、血清前白蛋白、转铁蛋白及白蛋白水平、简明膳食自评工具评分(SDSAT)、生活质量评分(EORTC QLQ-C30)、癌症疲乏评分(CFS)和对医护的满意度。

结果

两组均完成术后6个月的干预和随访。随访后评估结果显示,观察组患者SDS及SAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.01),SDSAT评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),血清前白蛋白、转铁蛋白及白蛋白水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05),EORCT QLQ-C30评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),CFS评分明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。观察组患者对医护满意度显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。

结论

基于电话、互联网和定期家庭随访可改善食管癌患者术后饮食功能和生活质量,并可减轻患者焦虑抑郁水平。

Objective

To explore the effects of internet, telephone support and regular family follow-up on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection in Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 60 cases in each group. In the control group, routine follow-up was used after operation, and the principle of diet addition, food choice and outpatient follow-up time were informed by responsible doctors and nurses. On the basis of routine follow-up, the patients in the observation group were followed up by doctors and nurses after discharge. One-to-one telephone guidance on lifestyle and dietary matters needing attention was conducted regularly, and family follow-up was conducted once a month. In the wechat group, responsible doctors and nurses regularly educated patients on postoperative health knowledge of esophageal cancer, guided patients on recovery and diet matters needing attention, and answered patients' postoperative rehabilitation questions regularly. Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores, serum prealbumin, transferrin, and albumin levels, Simplified dietary self-assessment tool score (SDSAT), quality of life questionnaire (EORCT QLQ-C30), cancer fatigue score (CFS), and satisfaction with care were evaluated at outpatient follow-up after 6 months in both groups.

Results

Both groups completed the intervention and follow-up 6 months after surgery. The evaluation results after follow-up showed that the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.01). The SDSAT score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum prealbumin, transferrin and albumin in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The EORCT QLQ-C30 score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CFS score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.01). The satisfaction of nursing in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Regular family follow-up based on telephone and internet can improve the dietary function and quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer after surgery, and reduce the level of anxiety and depression of patients.

表1 两组患者焦虑、抑郁评分比较(±s
表2 两组患者血清前白蛋白、转铁蛋白和白蛋白水平比较(±s
表3 两组患者生活质量比较(±s
表4 两组患者对医护满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
Morgan E, Soerjomataram I, Rumgay H, et al. The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020[J]. Gastroenterology, 2022, 163(3): 649-658.
[2]
Li X, Chen L, Luan S, et al. The development and progress of nanomedicine for esophageal cancer diagnosis and treatment[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2022, 86(Pt 2): 873-885.
[3]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
[4]
He F, Wang J, Liu L, et al. Esophageal cancer: trends in incidence and mortality in China from 2005 to 2015[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(5): 1839-1847.
[5]
Duan J, Tan Y, Yang N, et al. International comparison analysis of China's cancer incidence and mortality[J]. Chin J Front Med Sci, 2016, 8(7): 17-23.
[6]
季明明, 孙云浩, 王尧等. 胸腔镜微创手术与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的临床效果分析[J]. 系统医学, 2022, 7(21): 98-101.
[7]
保德蕊. 食管癌术后患者生存质量及标准支持性照护需求现状及进展研究[J]. 中国标准化, 2023(10): 243-246.
[8]
Hellstadius Y, Lagergren P, Lagergren J, Johar A, Hultman CM, Wikman A. Aspects of emotional functioning following oesophageal cancer surgery in a population-based cohort study[J]. Psychooncology, 2015, 24(1): 47-53.
[9]
孟飞. 延续性护理服务对食管癌手术患者生活质量的影响[J]. 甘肃科技, 2020, 36(14): 121-122, 120.
[10]
顾红苍. 早期食管癌术后肿瘤复发的影响因素分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2023, 17(9): 50-52.
[11]
张继荷, 郭亚男, 张玉. 心理干预对食管癌根治术患者焦虑抑郁情绪及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志, 2022, 28(4): 150-153.
[12]
丛明华, 石汉平. 肿瘤患者简明膳食自评工具的发明[J/OL]. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志, 2018, 5(1): 11-13.
[13]
黄子寅, 培尔顿·米吉提, 凯比努尔·艾尔肯, 等. EORTC QLQ-C30量表汇总评分在中国结直肠癌患者中的验证[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2022, 29(16): 1171-1176.
[14]
罗凤, 刘辉, 王东梅, 等. 整合式心理护理联合综合性营养干预对食管癌术后放疗患者心理健康状况营养状况及癌因性疲乏的影响[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志, 2023, 29(1): 124-130.
[15]
户相访, 李克亚, 刘倩楠等. 专职护理微信群结合电话随访对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2023, 29(23): 92-95.
[16]
Tang L, Dai J. Follow-Up Effect of Wechat Group on Discharged Patients with Colles Fracture[J]. Glob Chall, 2023, 7(7): 2300070.
[17]
Stenczel ND, Soare T, Ianovici C, et al. The goldmine of patient satisfaction-interaction and communication in the context of infectious diseases[J]. J Med Life, 2021, 14(4): 536-543.
[18]
孙亚莉, 袁泼棉, 同欢庆, 等. 基于微信平台的延续护理对腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17 (4): 481-484.
[19]
潘振山, 杜景霞. 长程心理干预对食管癌患者预后的影响研究[J]. 食管疾病, 2022, 4(2): 144-147.
[20]
崔璐婷, 郝雪梅. 基于信息-动机-行为技巧模式的护理干预结合精细化饮食指导对食管癌术后患者营养状态及知信行水平的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(15): 161-164.
[21]
刘海燕. 早期营养支持护理干预对食管癌患者术后胃肠功能的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2022, 20(36): 154-157.
[22]
孙楠, 陈莎莎, 郭思勤.基于互联网的延续性护理对乳腺癌患者术后恢复及癌因性疲乏的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文), 2022, 8(6):29-32.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 李萍, 陈慧, 庄君龙. 快速康复外科在机器人辅助腹腔镜膀胱切除回肠造口术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-253.
[3] 刘欣茹, 杜鹃, 代健健, 辛秀娟, 高梨梨. SBAR沟通模式在急诊腹股沟疝手术患者中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 451-455.
[4] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[5] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[6] 马锦芳, 何正光, 郑劲平. 盐酸氨溴索雾化吸入治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病黏痰症患者的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 568-574.
[7] 陶银花, 张红杰, 王亚岚, 陈莲, 张珺. 间歇式气压治疗预防肺癌化疗下肢深静脉血栓的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 605-608.
[8] 林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[9] 罗孝平, 封敏, 黄川, 唐茜, 蒋艳, 胡莉丽. 渐进式抗阻训练干预在非小细胞肺癌中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 472-474.
[10] 李临川, 李戊阳, 程玉刚, 朱健康, 张光永. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 135-140.
[11] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[12] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[13] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[14] 高鹏强, 林军鹏, 王佩元, 林辉, 周航, 魏文巍, 柳硕岩, 王枫. 胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中锁骨上淋巴结转移对预后的影响:一项大型回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 211-218.
[15] 李春光, 杨洋, 李斌, 华荣, 李志刚. 完全腹腔镜下管状胃制作技术在食管癌McKeown手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 219-224.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?