切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 213 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2024.03.005

论著

老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建
赵倩1, 刘文超1,(), 李玺琳1, 章邱东1   
  1. 1. 236000 安徽省,阜阳市人民医院老年医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-25 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘文超

Risk factors analysis and model construction of gastrointestinal injury induced by acute cerebral infarction in the elderly

Qian Zhao1, Wenchao Liu1,(), Xilin Li1, Qiudong Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Geriatrics, Fuyang People's Hospital, Anhui Province, Fuyang 236000, China
  • Received:2023-12-25 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenchao Liu
引用本文:

赵倩, 刘文超, 李玺琳, 章邱东. 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.

Qian Zhao, Wenchao Liu, Xilin Li, Qiudong Zhang. Risk factors analysis and model construction of gastrointestinal injury induced by acute cerebral infarction in the elderly[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.

目的

分析老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素并构建预测模型。

方法

纳入阜阳市人民医院老年医学科2021年9月至2023年10月收治的159例老年急性脑梗死患者,按照3∶1比例,将159例患者分别纳入训练集(n=119)、验证集(n=40),按照训练集患者胃肠损伤发生情况,将患者分别纳入发生组、未发生组,对比2组患者临床资料,并使用Logistic多因素回归分析模型,总结诱发患者胃肠损伤的相关因素。基于风险因素建立Nomogram模型,使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)验证模型效能并绘制决策曲线分析(DCA)。

结果

训练集119例患者中,53例发生胃肠损伤,发生率为44.54%,患者胃肠损伤以Ⅰ~Ⅱ级为主;验证集发生胃肠损伤18例,发生率为45.00%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.003,P=0.959)。Logistic多因素回归分析示,梗死部位为小脑、脑干或丘脑,血钠异常均为影响老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的独立风险因素(P<0.05)。基于风险因素建立的列线图模型内部验证结果示,训练集、验证集AUC分别为0.881、0.867。Kolmogorov-Smimov拟合优度检验结果示模型校准度良好(χ2=3.879,R2=0.926,P>0.05)。DCA结果显示,在10%~88%阈值范围内,训练集、验证集决策曲线均位于All、None上方。

结论

老年急性脑梗死患者胃肠损伤发生风险较高,与梗死部位、血钠水平异常有关,基于风险因素建立的列线图模型效能良好、净收益率较高,能够为胃肠损伤风险评估提供可靠参考。

Objective

To analyze the risk factors of gastrointestinal injury induced by acute cerebral infarction in the elderly and build a prediction model.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-nine elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted to the Department of Geriatrics of Fuyang People's Hospital from September 2021 to October 2023 were included. According to the ratio of 3∶1, 159 patients were divided into a training set (n=119) and a validation set (n=40). According to the occurrence of gastrointestinal injury in the training set, the patients were divided into the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared, and Logistic multivariate regression was used to summarize the related factors inducing gastrointestinal injury. Based on the risk factors, the Nomogram model was established, and the efficiency of the model was verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the decision curve analysis (DCA) was drawn.

Results

Among the 119 patients in the training set, 53 patients suffered from gastrointestinal injuries, the incidence rate was 44.54%, and the gastrointestinal injuries of patients were mainly Grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ. There were 18 cases of gastrointestinal injury in the verification group, the incidence rate was 45.00%, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.003, P=0.959). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that the infarction site was cerebellum, brain stem or thalamus and abnormal blood sodium were independent risk factors for gastrointestinal injury induced by acute cerebral infarction in the elderly (P<0.05). The internal verification results of Nomogram model based on risk factors showed that the AUC of training set and verification set were 0.881 and 0.867, respectively. Kolmogorov-Smimov goodness-of-fit test results showed that the calibration of the model was good (χ2=3.879, R2=0.926, P>0.05). DCA results showed that the decision curves of training set and test set were above All and None in the threshold range of 10%-88%.

Conclusion

The risk of gastrointestinal injury in elderly patients with acute cerebral infarction is high, which is related to the location of infarction, blood sodium level abnormal. The Nomogram model based on risk factors has good efficiency and high net yield, which can provide reliable reference for risk assessment of gastrointestinal injury.

表1 训练集发生组、未发生组临床资料比较[例(%)]
表2 影响老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的多因素回归分析结果
图1 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的预测列线图
表3 模型区分度评价及内部验证
图2 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤预测列线图的决策曲线分析结果
[1]
Li X, You X, Wang C, et al. Bidirectional brain‐gut‐microbiota axis in increased intestinal permeability induced by central nervous system injury[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2020, 26(8): 783-790.
[2]
Wei M, Huang Q, Liu Z, et al. Intestinal barrier dysfunction participates in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2021, 20(5): 401-416.
[3]
吕水清, 朱德斌, 顾群. 急性脑梗死患者并发胃肠道感染临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2019, 27(11): 682-687.
[4]
Nicholson SE, Watts LT, Burmeister DM, et al. Moderate traumatic brain injury alters the gastrointestinal microbiome in a time-dependent manner[J]. Shock, 2019, 52(2): 240-248.
[5]
Han Y, Liao Z, Li Y, et al. Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for assessment of antiplatelet therapy-induced gastrointestinal injury[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 79(2): 116-128.
[6]
安朋朋, 王佳宁, 任志珍, 等. 脑梗死急性期大鼠胃肠黏膜损伤的动态变化观察[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2019, 26(4): 398-401.
[7]
陈金莹, 罗云英, 朱珍萍, 等. 早期肠内营养联合益生菌对重症缺血性脑卒中患者肠道菌群及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2019, 26(3): 328-332.
[8]
Zhang X, Chen S, Lai K, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury in critical care patients with acute cerebrovascular disease[J]. Ren Fail, 2022, 44(1): 43-53.
[9]
Cho J, Park Y J, Gonzales‐Portillo B, et al. Gut dysbiosis in stroke and its implications on Alzheimer's disease‐like cognitive dysfunction[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2021, 27(5): 505-514.
[10]
罗思宇, 祝慧凤, 万东审. 评估急性脑卒中病情及预后的肠源性指标[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2021, 38(10): 1138-1139.
[11]
Keshavarzi Z, Shakeri F, Barreto GE, et al. Medicinal plants in traumatic brain injury: Neuroprotective mechanisms revisited[J]. Biofactors, 2019, 45(4): 517-535.
[12]
陈玄斌. EEN治疗中重度颅脑损伤患者胃肠粘膜屏障动态变化及意义[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2019, 27(2): 14-16.
[13]
Monsour M, Borlongan CV. The central role of peripheral inflammation in ischemic stroke[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2023, 43(5): 622-641.
[14]
程萍, 陈治任, 孙旭, 等. 肠道菌群与缺血性脑卒中相关性的研究进展[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2023, 40(4): 375-378.
[15]
魏志强. 缺血性脑卒中二级预防药物对消化系统损伤的研究进展[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2021, 29(2): 81-86.
[16]
Liu C, Liu N, Zhang S, et al. Salvianolic acid A prevented cerebrovascular endothelial injury caused by acute ischemic stroke through inhibiting the Src signaling pathway[J]. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 370-381.
[17]
彭建红, 韩莉, 邵爱民. 肠内营养联合益生菌对重症脑卒中伴胃肠功能障碍患者肠黏膜屏障的保护作用[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 2021, 33(6): 704-707.
[18]
Liu J, Miyake H, Zhu H, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation by enema reduces intestinal injury in experimental necrotizing enterocolitis[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2020, 55(6): 1094-1098.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[3] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[4] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[5] 屈勤芳, 束方莲. 盆腔器官脱垂患者盆底重建手术后压力性尿失禁发生的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-612.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[8] 犹成亿, 尤恒, 叶东樊, 张雯, 刘禹, 王仁宇, 苏琳茜, 甘慧, 徐智. 基于3D Res U-Net-Faster RCNN 技术和CT 影像学特征的肺结节性质预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 673-679.
[9] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[10] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[11] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[12] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[13] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
[14] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[15] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?