切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 529 -533. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2025.05.019

论著

环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的量效关系研究
乔燕, 陈湉(), 施冬冬, 肖骥锋   
  1. 214000 江苏无锡,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-23 出版日期:2025-10-01
  • 通信作者: 陈湉
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省重点研发计划专项资金项目(BE2020771)

Dose-effect relationship of ciprofol combined with remifentanil to inhibit responses to gastroscope insertion

Yan Qiao, Tian Chen(), Dongdong Shi, Jifeng Xiao   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, No.904 Hospital of Joint Service Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuxi 214000, China
  • Received:2024-11-23 Published:2025-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Tian Chen
引用本文:

乔燕, 陈湉, 施冬冬, 肖骥锋. 环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的量效关系研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 529-533.

Yan Qiao, Tian Chen, Dongdong Shi, Jifeng Xiao. Dose-effect relationship of ciprofol combined with remifentanil to inhibit responses to gastroscope insertion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(05): 529-533.

目的

探讨环泊酚联合瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的量效关系。

方法

纳入2024年1—4月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院收治拟行无痛胃镜检查的患者。纳入标准:年龄18~65岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级、体重指数18.5~27.9 kg/m2。静脉注射环泊酚,注射时间30 s,静脉泵注瑞芬太尼1.0 μg/kg,泵注时间60 s。使用Dixon序贯法调整患者环泊酚剂量,初始剂量设定为0.30 mg/kg,调整范围为±0.02 mg/kg。使用Probit回归计算环泊酚联合1.0 μg/kg瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的半数有效量(ED50)、95%有效量(ED95)。记录患者入内镜室即刻(T0)、环泊酚注射后1 min(T1)、胃镜置入即刻(T2)、胃镜撤出即刻(T3)、完全苏醒时(T4)的心率、无创平均动脉压(MAP)和血氧饱和度。记录苏醒时间、麻醉后复苏室停留时间及围手术期并发症。

结果

依照Dixon序贯法,在纳入28例患者后终止研究。Probit回归结果显示,环泊酚联合1.0 μg/kg瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的ED50为0.254 mg/kg (95% CI 0.242~0.266);ED95为0.290 mg/kg(95% CI 0.260~0.320)。患者T1、T2、T3时点的MAP明显低于T0时点,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者苏醒时间为(5.3±1.8)min、麻醉后复苏室停留时间为(46.4±11.1)min。患者在术中出现心动过缓2例、低氧血症2例和低血压3例。

结论

环泊酚联合1.0 μg/kg瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的ED50、ED95分别为0.254、0.290 mg/kg,该麻醉方案围手术期并发症发生率较低,具有较高的有效性和安全性。

Objective

To evaluate the dose-effect relationship of ciprofol combined with remifentanil to inhibit responses to gastroscope insertion.

Methods

Patients who planned to undergo gastroscopy from January 2024 to April 2024 were included. Inclusion criteria: age 18-65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅰ to Ⅱ, body mass index (BMI) 18.5-27.9 kg/m2. Ciprofol was injected intravenously for 30 s, remifentanil was injected intravenously for 1.0 μg/kg for 60 s. The patients' ciprofol dose was adjusted by Dixon sequential method. The initial dose was set at 0.30 mg/kg and the adjustment range was ±0.02 mg/kg. Probit regression was used to calculate the ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol combined with 1.0 μg/kg remifentanil to inhibit gastroscope insertion. The heart rate, noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) of patients were recorded immediately after entering the endoscopy room (T0), 1 min after ciprofol injection (T1), immediately after gastroscope insertion (T2), immediately after gastroscope withdrawal (T3), and at the time of recovery (T4). Recovery time, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and perioperative complications were recorded.

Results

According to the Dixon sequential method, the study was terminated after 28 patients were enrolled. Probit regression results showed that the ED50 of cipofol combined with 1.0 μg/kg remifentanil inhibited responses to gastroscope insertion was 0.254 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.242-0.266 mg/kg). The ED95 was 0.290 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.260-0.320 mg/kg). The MAP of T1, T2 and T3 was significantly lower than that of T0, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The recovery time of patients was (5.3±1.8) min and the length of PACU stay was (46.4±11.1) min. Bradycardia, hypoxemia and hypotension occurred in 2, 2 and 3 patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The ED50 and ED95 of cipofol combined with 1.0 μg/kg remifentanil to inhibit responses to gastroscope insertion are 0.254 mg/kg and 0.290 mg/kg, respectively. This anesthesia program has a low incidence of perioperative complications and has high efficacy and safety.

图1 环泊酚联合1.0 μg/kg瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的Dixon序贯图注:黑色圆点代表胃镜置入反应阴性;白色圆点代表胃镜置入反应阳性
图2 环泊酚联合1.0 μg/kg瑞芬太尼抑制胃镜置入反应的剂量反应图
表1 28例患者各时点血流动力学指标(±s
[1]
Hepner DL, Siddiqui UD. Endoscopy and Sedation[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2022, 117(10S): 33-38.
[2]
陈靖, 朱芸燕, 张传武, 等. 环泊酚在临床麻醉中的应用研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2023, 44(10): 1111-1115.
[3]
Lu M, Liu J, Wu X, et al. Ciprofol: A Novel Alternative to Propofol in Clinical Intravenous Anesthesia?[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2023, 2023: 7443226.
[4]
Zhong J, Zhang J, Fan Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2023, 85: 111047.
[5]
Currò JM, Santonocito C, Merola F, et al. Ciprofol as compared to propofol for sedation and general anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Anesth Analg Crit Care, 2024, 4(1): 24.
[6]
Feldman PL. Insights into the Chemical Discovery of Remifentanil [J]. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(5): 1229-1234.
[7]
Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ 2nd, et al. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 87(2): 327-337.
[8]
Pastis NJ, Hill NT, Yarmus LB, et al. Correlation of Vital Signs and Depth of Sedation by Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation(MOAA/S) Scale in Bronchoscopy[J]. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol, 2022, 29(1): 54-61.
[9]
环泊酚临床应用指导意见专家小组. 环泊酚临床应用指导意见(2023)[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2023, 43(7): 769-772.
[10]
Hayes J, Matava C, Pehora C, et al. Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 121(2): 453-461.
[11]
Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, et al. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: Phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials[J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2021, 164: 105904.
[12]
Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1991, 15(1): 47-50.
[13]
黄凤南, 徐城, 崔珊珊, 等. 环泊酚单药与联合小剂量舒芬太尼在无痛胃镜检查中的麻醉效果比较[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2023, 44(5): 585-589.
[14]
Akhtar SMM, Fareed A, Ali M, et al. Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCT)[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2024, 94: 111425.
[15]
李玲瑶, 李术榕, 李响, 等. 环泊酚临床应用现状及研究进展[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2023, 42(1): 97-99.
[16]
黄瑾, 张珈硕, 姜卜维, 等. 环泊酚临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2023, 43(9): 1149-1152.
[17]
易强林, 莫怀忠, 胡慧, 等. 环泊酚与丙泊酚在老年患者无痛胃镜检查中的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(7): 712-715.
[18]
Martinez RA, Hurff A, DeGeorge KC, et al. How to minimize the pain of local anesthetic administration[J]. J Fam Pract, 2020, 69(4): 172-178.
[19]
Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, et al. Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study[J]. CNS Drugs, 2022, 36(3): 301-313.
[20]
Li J, Wang X, Liu J, et al. Comparison of ciprofol(HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial[J]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2022, 131(2): 138-148.
[21]
Chen L, Xie Y, Du X, et al. The Effect of Different Doses of Ciprofol in Patients with Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2023, 17: 1733-1740.
[22]
梁文波, 任志强, 秦卫民, 等. 不同剂量环泊酚用于无痛胃镜检查的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(5): 481-485.
[23]
郑龙彬, 秦卫民, 梁文波, 等. 环泊酚复合舒芬太尼用于肥胖患者无痛胃镜检查的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(5): 557-559.
[24]
马艳辉, 连一闻, 刘芳妍, 等. 小剂量艾司氯胺酮对环泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查麻醉诱导半数有效剂量的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(5): 458-462.
[1] 郭建丽, 珠娜, 宋飞, 柴国东. 七氟烷吸入复合瑞芬太尼麻醉在小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 223-227.
[2] 于广东, 纪月珑, 李向南, 邓龙生. 纳布啡联合瑞芬太尼在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝手术术后应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 463-467.
[3] 丁美平, 包义勇, 韦友琴, 吴鼎, 吴志东. 瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚复合七氟醚在小儿腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜手术中的麻醉效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 435-438.
[4] 赵璐, 侯俊德, 陈永学, 王晓微, 陈士欢, 刘盼盼. 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜手术麻醉中的镇痛效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 429-431.
[5] 张宏江, 刘雪莲, 郑立. 瑞芬太尼联合右美托咪定在腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的麻醉效果及对并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 425-428.
[6] 张红霞, 李炜, 唐霞, 张小华. 七氟烷联合瑞芬太尼麻醉对老年腹腔镜疝修补术患者苏醒质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 330-333.
[7] 陈静, 张春明, 周斌, 吴明明. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺叶切除患者术后应激反应及血清PAF、γ干扰素的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 554-556.
[8] 刘玉涛, 苏振波, 梁风, 成昌霞. 不同浓度瑞芬太尼辅助麻醉对肺癌根治术患者围术期疼痛的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 785-788.
[9] 隋金玲, 张爱萍, 许旭东. 右美托咪定复合瑞芬太尼在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术老年患者中的麻醉效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 357-360.
[10] 刘梦真. 心理疏导对初次行电子胃镜检查患者的情绪及成功率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 317-319.
[11] 汤北岭, 李启松, 赵云. 形似良性溃疡的早期胃癌的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 268-270.
[12] 杨阳, 田小溪, 杨彦龙, 付国强, 李立宏. 多发性创伤患者院前急救镇痛对预后的效果评估:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 851-856.
[13] 王盈盈, 邱晓珏, 刘晓冰, 宋杰, 姚怡, 高远. 胃镜检查黏膜清洁准备研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2025, 12(02): 130-134.
[14] 汪颖, 李泉, 李沛霖, 薛立新, 吴璇, 刘宝胤. 减重代谢手术前后规范化胃镜检查的分析研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 91-94.
[15] 杨美琳, 张高松. 高分辨率食管测压检查在经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病疗效分析中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 27-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?