切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 114 -119. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2026.02.004

论著

胰腺癌患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐风险列线图构建及验证
孙娟华, 白引苗, 孔胜男, 王梦雪, 王文慧, 张红梅()   
  1. 710032 西安,中国人民解放军空军军医大学第一附属医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-28 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张红梅
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项课题(2024ZD0525503)

Construction and verification of a nomogram of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting risk in patients with pancreatic cancer

Juanhua Sun, Yinmiao Bai, Shengnan Kong, Mengxue Wang, Wenhui Wang, Hongmei Zhang()   

  1. Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University of the People's Liberation Army, Xi'an 710032, China
  • Received:2025-05-28 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongmei Zhang
引用本文:

孙娟华, 白引苗, 孔胜男, 王梦雪, 王文慧, 张红梅. 胰腺癌患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐风险列线图构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 114-119.

Juanhua Sun, Yinmiao Bai, Shengnan Kong, Mengxue Wang, Wenhui Wang, Hongmei Zhang. Construction and verification of a nomogram of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting risk in patients with pancreatic cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(02): 114-119.

目的

构建胰腺癌患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐(CINV)的风险因素模型,并验证其应用效果。

方法

回顾性收集2022年2月至2024年2月中国人民解放军空军军医大学第一附属医院收治的138例胰腺癌患者,根据是否出现CINV,将患者分为CINV组(n=57)和无CINV组(n=81),分析两组患者临床资料差异,通过单因素分析筛选有统计学意义的变量,进一步通过多因素Logistic回归验证。按3∶1分为训练组(n=104)和验证组(n=34),构建列线图(Nomogram)预测模型,并以受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)及决策曲线分析(DCA)验证模型预测效能与校准度。

结果

CINV组和无CINV组在年龄、既往晕动病、妊娠期恶心呕吐史、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、化疗次数、胃肠道疾病、预期性CINV、低钾血症、低镁血症、营养不良等方面具有明显差异(P<0.05)。Logistic多因素分析显示,年龄18~50岁、既往晕动病、妊娠期恶心呕吐史、PSQI评分≥8分、SAS评分≥50分、化疗次数<3次、合并胃肠道疾病、预期性CINV、低钾血症、低镁血症、营养不良均为影响胰腺癌CINV发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。模型应用于训练组、验证组的曲线下面积分别为0.843、0.838,应用于验证组的灵敏度、特异性分别为82.70%、83.19%,DCA分析示模型临床净收益率较高。通过校准曲线分析和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验(P=0.372)验证,模型预测概率与实际观察概率高度一致,提示良好的校准度。

结论

胰腺癌患者CINV发生的风险较高,且与年龄、既往晕动病、妊娠期恶心呕吐史、PSQI评分、SAS评分、化疗次数、胃肠道疾病、预期性CINV、低钾血症、低镁血症、营养不良等因素有关,基于上述因素建立的预测模型能够为胰腺癌患者CINV发生减少风险评估提供可靠参考。

Objective

To construct a risk factor model of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with pancreatic cancer and verify its application effect.

Methods

A retrospective collection was made of 138 patients with pancreatic cancer admitted to First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University of the People's Liberation Army from February 2022 to February 2024. The patients were divided into the CINV group (n=57) and the non-CINV group (n=81) based on whether CINV occurred, the differences in clinical data between the two groups were analyzed, and statistically significant variables were screened through univariate analysis, it was further verified through multivariate Logistic regression. The patients were divided into a training group (n=104) and a validation group (n=34) at a 3∶1 ratio. A nomogram prediction model was constructed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the predictive efficacy and calibration degree of the model.

Results

The terms of age, history of motion sickness, history of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, sleep status (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI score), anxiety level (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS score), number of chemotherapy cycles, gastrointestinal diseases, psychological anticipation of CINV, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and malnutrition between the CINV group and the non-CINV group were significantly different (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate analysis showed that age 18-50 years old, previous motion sickness, history of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, PSQI score ≥8 points, SAS score ≥50 points, chemotherapy frequency <3 times, combined gastrointestinal diseases, psychological anticipation of CINV, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and malnutrition were all independent risk factors affecting the occurrence of CINV in pancreatic cancer (P<0.05). The areas under the curve of the model applied in the training group and the verification group were 0.843 and 0.838 respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity applied in the verification group were 82.70% and 83.19% respectively, and DCA analysis showed that the clinical net rate of return of the model was relatively high. Through calibration curve analysis and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=0.372) verification, the predicted probability of the model was highly consistent with the actual observed probability, suggesting a good calibration degree.

Conclusion

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a relatively high risk of CINV occurrence, and it is related to factors such as age, previous motion sickness, history of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, PSQI score, SAS score, number of chemotherapy sessions, gastrointestinal diseases, psychological anticipation of CINV occurrence, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and malnutrition, and the prediction model established based on the above factors can provide a reliable reference for the risk assessment of reducing the occurrence of CINV in patients with pancreatic cancer.

表1 两组胰腺癌患者临床资料比较
临床资料 CINV组(n=57) 无CINV组(n=81) t/χ2 P
性别[例(%)] 23(40.35) 44(54.32) 2.614 0.105
  34(59.65) 37(45.68)
年龄[例(%)] 18~50岁 40(70.18) 25(30.86) 20.750 <0.001
  ≥50岁 17(29.82) 56(69.13)
体重指数(kg/m2,±s) 22.86±1.77 23.49±1.68 1.907 0.057
既往化疗史[例(%)] 18(31.58) 29(35.80) 0.265 0.606
  39(68.42) 52(64.20)
既往晕动病[例(%)] 30(52.63) 24(29.63) 7.431 0.006
  27(47.37) 57(70.37)
妊娠期恶心呕吐史[例(%)] 30(52.63) 17(20.99) 14.160 <0.001
  4(7.02) 20(24.69)
饮酒史[例(%)] 15(26.32) 22(27.16) 0.012 0.912
  42(73.68) 59(72.84)
匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分(±s) 7.15±0.35 3.13±0.56    
焦虑自评量表评分(±s) 62.56±5.49 42.60±4.38    
使用非甾体抗炎药[例(%)] 21(36.84) 30(37.04) 0.001 0.981
  36(63.16) 51(62.96)
化疗次数[例(%)] <3次 34(59.65) 25(30.86) 11.326 <0.001
  ≥3次 23(40.35) 56(69.13)
胃肠道疾病[例(%)] 40(70.18) 28(34.57) 12.990 <0.001
  17(29.82) 45(65.43)
化疗方案[例(%)] 多药联合 35(61.40) 48(59.26) 0.064 <0.001
  单一药物 22(38.60) 33(40.74)
预期性CINV[例(%)] 46(80.70) 51(62.96) 5.041 0.024
  11(19.30) 30(37.04)
低钾血症[例(%)] 39(68.42) 38(46.91) 6.274 0.012
  18(31.58) 43(50.09)
低镁血症[例(%)] 40(70.18) 43(53.09) 4.076 0.043
  17(29.82) 38(46.91)
营养不良[例(%)] 30(52.63) 25(30.86) 6.613 0.010
  27(47.37) 56(69.13)
血红蛋白(±s) <110 g/L 34(59.65) 44(54.32) 0.386 0.534
  ≥110 g/L 23(40.35) 37(45.68)
白蛋白(±s) <35 g/L 33(57.89) 45(55.56) 0.074 0.784
  ≥35 g/L 24(42.11) 36(44.44)
估算肾小球滤过率(±s) <60 mL/(min·1.73 m2) 39(68.42) 56(69.13) 0.008 0.928
  ≥60 mL/(min·1.73 m2) 18(31.58) 25(30.86)
C反应蛋白(±s) <10 mg/L 24(42.11) 35(42.21) 0.016 0.897
  ≥10 mg/L 33(57.89) 46(56.79)
表2 影响胰腺癌CINV发生的多因素回归分析结果
图1 胰腺癌CINV发生的Nomogram模型注:CINV化疗相关性恶心呕吐;PSQI匹兹堡睡眠质量指数;SAS焦虑自评量表
图2 Nomogram模型应用于验证组的ROC曲线
图3 Nomogram模型应用于验证组的DCA曲线
图4 CINV风险预测模型的校正曲线注:CINV化疗相关性恶心呕吐
表3 Nomogram模型预测胰腺癌化疗相关性恶心呕吐发生的效能分析(%)
[1]
Okuyama A, Boku N, Higashi T. Real-world emetic risk of chemotherapy and the corresponding antiemetic therapy in Japan: A study based on a nationwide database[J]. Cancer Rep(Hoboken), 2022, 5(3): e1482.
[2]
屠娜飞, 詹芳娟, 黄馨睿, 等. 成人化疗相关性恶心呕吐患者中医护理干预的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理与康复, 2025, 24(3): 51-57, 63.
[3]
天津市抗癌协会癌症康复与姑息治疗专业委员会, 天津市医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会, 张琳琳. 难治性化疗相关性恶心呕吐防治的天津专家共识(2025版)[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(1): 1-8.
[4]
曾亚奇, 王昆, 宁涛, 等. 晚期胰腺癌患者PG-SGA与化疗不良反应的相关性研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(21): 3614-3618.
[5]
Meng Y, Wu F, Kwak S, et al. Oral Bacterial and Fungal Microbiome and Subsequent Risk for Pancreatic Cancer[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2025, 11(11): 1331-1340.
[6]
张小娜, 符燕妹, 田燕, 等. 老年妇科肿瘤患者紫杉醇联合卡铂化疗后CINV发生影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(6): 1316-1319.
[7]
Hishida-Sadaka S, Iihara H, Ohata K, et al. Efficacy and safety of 5HT3RA, DEX, and NK1RA for the prevention of FOLFIRINOX- induced nausea and vomiting in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2023, 31(12): 657.
[8]
Zhang J, Wang P, Sun Y, et al. Intraperitoneal Irrigation Chemotherapy with Lobaplatin in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Special Type of Abdominal Chemotherapy[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2024, 25(7): 2409-2413.
[9]
上海市抗癌协会癌症康复与姑息治疗专业委员会, 上海市抗癌协会肿瘤药物临床研究专业委员会, 中国老年保健协会肿瘤防治与临床研究管理专业委员会, 等. 抗肿瘤治疗所致恶心呕吐全程管理上海专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(1): 104-133.
[10]
McAndrew EN, Zhang H, Lambert P, et al. Treatment Patterns, Toxicity, and Outcomes of Older Adults With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving First-line Palliative Chemotherapy[J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2022, 45(2): 55-60.
[11]
Zhu Y, Fang S, Fan B, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts reprogram cysteine metabolism to increase tumor resistance to ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer[J]. Theranostics, 2024, 14(4): 1683-1700.
[12]
杜巧红, 廉莉, 吴瑞丽. 老年妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐与癌因性疲乏的关系及其影响因素[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2024, 23(4): 276-280.
[13]
梁轶, 严忠婷, 桑玉还, 等. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后恶心和呕吐的危险因素及评估工具研究进展[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2024, 33(5): 565-570.
[14]
刘佳惠, 胡美华, 邓诗佳, 等. 化疗相关性恶心呕吐风险评估的证据总结[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(3): 399-404.
[15]
Saito Y, Takekuma Y, Komatsu Y, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment for biliary tract cancer: acid suppressants do not prevent nausea[J]. Pharmazie, 2022, 77(6): 196-201.
[16]
魏浩洁, 武东, 黄灿, 等. 乳腺癌患者化疗所致恶心呕吐预防失败的危险因素分析与预测模型建立[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2024, 44(23): 2761-2767.
[17]
Hayashi T, Shimokawa M, Matsuo K, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) with carboplatin plus pemetrexed or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2021, 21(1): 74.
[18]
Liang W, Ren Y, Wang Y, et al. Xiao-Ban-Xia Decoction Alleviates Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting by Inhibiting Ferroptosis via Activation of The Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 Pathway[J]. Adv Biol(Weinh), 2024, 8(12): e2400323.
[19]
Becherini C, Salvestrini V, Desideri I, et al. Impact of fosaprepitant in the prevention of nausea and emesis in head and neck cancer patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemoradiation: a pilot prospective study and a review of literature[J]. Radiol Med, 2024, 129(3): 457-466.
[20]
Xiang Z, Song Y, Li J, et al. Impact of Donor CMV-Seropostive Grafts on Prognosis of Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. J Med Virol, 2025, 97(1): e70150.
[21]
Muttillo EM, Chiarella LL, Ratti F, et al. Is robotic liver resection feasible in patients with lesions in close proximity to major vessels? A propensity score matching analysis[J]. HPB(Oxford), 2025, 27(1): 21-28.
[22]
赵怀晴, 王奂生, 张培海, 等. 基于循证的非药物干预方案在妇科肿瘤病人化疗所致恶心呕吐中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(6): 970-974.
[23]
Vaswani B, Dattatreya PS, Barkate H, et al. The Effectiveness of an Oral Fixed-Dose Combination of Netupitant and Palonosetron (NEPA) in Patients With Multiple Risk Factors for Chemotherapy- Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Multicenter, Observational Indian Study[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(9): e29094.
[1] 王晨曦, 姚心怡, 石汪琼, 杜丽萍. 乳腺癌患者复发风险感知的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 179-181.
[2] 李康虎, 刘凯, 王继伟, 王光远. 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留风险列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 442-449.
[3] 宋辉, 朱亮, 于茜. 胰腺癌肝转移临床特征及危险因素[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 73-78.
[4] 廖艳, 成伟. 近红外荧光成像技术在胰腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 693-699.
[5] 郑秉礼, 彭洁, 孟塬. KRAS基因突变对可切除胰腺癌临床预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 456-462.
[6] 颜军, 周强, 郭诗翔. 海德堡三角清扫在胰腺癌外科治疗中应用的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 449-455.
[7] 刘翔, 刘军桂, 张涛, 金奎, 郭宇, 雷磊, 段伟宏. 胰腺癌动脉受侵的类型及手术策略研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 442-448.
[8] 李毅, 姚略, 侯相见. 颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后新发出血的风险预测列线图模型构建[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 307-313.
[9] 朱永慧, 桑迪, 宋佳. 肝癌大范围肝切除患者术后骨骼肌减少的列线图预测模型构建及临床验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 467-473.
[10] 李真, 王瑞. 老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜根治后全身麻醉苏醒延迟的风险预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 517-523.
[11] 刘洋, 马宁泊, 郭辉. 晚期结肠癌患者全身麻醉苏醒期躁动发生风险列线图模型的构建及应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 386-392.
[12] 高星, 宦乡. 老年胃癌患者术后谵妄发生的风险列线图模型构建及应用验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 398-404.
[13] 郎旭, 曾嘉. 不可逆电穿孔联合化疗治疗Ⅳ期胰腺癌的临床疗效和可行性分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 217-221.
[14] 毛洁芹, 蒲雨馨, 柯志刚, 童卫东. 减重手术对结直肠癌发病风险的影响及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 318-324.
[15] 南博, 拜云虎, 张宁, 杨雁灵. 肥胖与消化道肿瘤的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 240-248.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?