切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 280 -285. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2021.06.008

临床研究

内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病疗效的meta分析
姜元喜1, 陈莹1, 孙会会1, 许树长1,()   
  1. 1. 200065 上海,同济大学附属同济医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-02 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 许树长
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会科研课题(202040079); 上海申康医院发展中心市级医院新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目(SHDC12016109)

Efficacy of endoscopic microradiofrequency in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis

Yuanxi Jiang1, Ying Chen1, Huihui Sun1, Shuchang Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
  • Received:2021-05-02 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuchang Xu
引用本文:

姜元喜, 陈莹, 孙会会, 许树长. 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病疗效的meta分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 280-285.

Yuanxi Jiang, Ying Chen, Huihui Sun, Shuchang Xu. Efficacy of endoscopic microradiofrequency in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(06): 280-285.

目的

对内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的疗效进行meta分析。

方法

通过计算机检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library、Elsevier、万方数据库、维普数据库及中国知网数据库,收集有关难治性GERD内镜下微量射频治疗疗效的文献,经纳入和排除标准筛选文献,提取入选文献的数据资料,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析。

结果

共纳入9篇文献,均为队列研究。Meta分析结果显示,内镜下微量射频治疗GERD可以明显降低患者烧心(平均差值-2.21,P<0.000 01)、反流(平均差值-3.85,P<0.000 01)、胸痛(平均差值-2.92,P<0.000 01)、咳嗽(平均差值-3.87,P<0.000 01)、哮喘(平均差值-4.15,P<0.000 01)等症状评分,降低胃食管反流病相关生活质量量表(GERD-HRQL)评分(平均差值-19.84,P<0.000 01),减少质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用(99.9% vs 41.2%,P<0.000 01),减轻食管炎(62.3% vs 34.0%,P<0.000 01)。治疗前后患者满意度评分有所提高(平均差值2.46,P<0.000 01),但满意人数差异无统计学意义(20.0% vs 87.9%,P=0.28)。

结论

内镜下微量射频治疗GERD可以明显缓解患者烧心、反流、胸痛、咳嗽、哮喘等症状,提高生活质量,减少PPI使用,减轻食管炎。

Objective

To determine the efficacy of the endoscopic microradiofrenquency in the treatment of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using meta-analysis.

Methods

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, Wanfang, VIP and CNKI were searched by computer to collect literatures on the efficacy of endoscopic microradiofrenquency for refractory GERD. The literatures were screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data of the selected literatures were extracted. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 9 studies were enrolled, all of which were cohort studies. The meta-analysis results showed that endoscopic microradiofrenquency could reduce the heartburn (mean difference -2.21, P<0.000 01), regurgitation (mean difference -3.85, P<0.000 01), chest pain (mean difference -2.92, P<0.000 01), cough (mean difference -3.87, P<0.000 01) and asthma score (mean difference -4.15, P<0.000 01). The procedure also reduced GERD-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score (mean difference -19.84, P<0.000 01), the use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (99.9% vs 41.2%, P<0.000 01) and esophageal inflammation (62.3% vs 34.0%, P<0.000 01). After treatment, the satisfaction score of patients were improved (mean difference 2.46, P<0.000 01), but the difference in the number of satisfied patients was not statistically significant (20.0% vs 87.9%, P=0.28).

Conclusion

Endoscopic microradiofrenquency can significantly relieve patients' heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, cough, asthma and other symptoms, improve the quality of life, reduce the use of PPI, and relieve esophageal inflammation.

表1 纳入文献的基本信息
表2 纳入文献质量评价(分)
图1 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病症状评分的森林图
图2 烧心症状评分倒漏斗图
图3 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病相关生活质量量表评分的森林图
图4 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病质子泵抑制剂使用情况的森林图
图5 质子泵抑制剂使用情况倒漏斗图
图6 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病满意度评分的森林图
图7 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病满意人数的森林图
图8 内镜下微量射频治疗难治性胃食管反流病食管炎的森林图
1
Scarpellini E, Ang D, Pauwels A, et al. Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms [J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 13(5): 281-294.
2
Pearl J, Pauli E, Dunkin B, et al. SAGES endoluminal treatments for GERD [J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(10): 3783-3790.
3
中华医学会消化病学分会. 2014年中国胃食管反流病专家共识意见[J].胃肠病学, 2015, 20(3): 155-168.
4
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605.
5
Fass R, Cahn F, Scotti DJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and prospective cohort efficacy studies of endoscopic radiofrequency for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(12): 4865-4882.
6
Gregory D, Scotti DJ, Buck D, et al. Budget impact analysis to estimate the cost dynamics of treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with radiofrequency energy: a payer perspective [J]. Manag Care, 2016, 25(5): 42-50.
7
Mattar SG, Qureshi F, Taylor D, et al. Treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with radiofrequency energy (Stretta) in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(6): 850-854.
8
Noar M, Squires P, Khan S. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter improves gastroesophageal reflux patient-reported outcomes in failed laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication cohort [J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7): 2854-2862.
9
Noar M, Squires P, Noar E, et al. Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory GERD: a decade later [J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(8): 2323-2333.
10
Liang WT, Wu JN, Wang F, et al. Five-year follow-up of a prospective study comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with Stretta radiofrequency for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Minerva Chir, 2014, 69(4): 217-223.
11
Liang WT, Wang ZG, Wang F, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure: a prospective observational study [J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2014, 14: 178.
12
Reymunde A, Santiago N. Long-term results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD: sustained improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and drug use at 4-year follow-up [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2007, 65(3): 361-366.
13
Hu ZW, Wang ZG, Zhang Y, et al. A preliminary investigation of anti-reflux intervention for gastroesophageal reflux related childhood-to-adult persistent asthma [J]. Ann Surg Innov Res, 2014, 8: 3.
14
Liu HF, Zhang JG, Li J, et al. Improvement of clinical parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after radiofrequency energy delivery [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(39): 4429-4433.
15
Liang WT, Yan C, Wang ZG, et al. Early and midterm outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication and a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective observational study [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(8): 657-661.
16
Mavrelis P, Aziz AMA, Rearick C, et al. Longer Term Clinical Outcomes after Radiofrequency Therapy for refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) [J]. Pract Gastroenterol, 2007, 31(10): 73-80.
17
Noar MD, Lotfi-Emran S. Sustained improvement in symptoms of GERD and antisecretory drug use: 4-year follow-up of the Stretta procedure [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2007, 65(3): 367-372.
18
Viswanath Y, Maguire N, Obuobi RB, et al. Endoscopic day case antireflux radiofrequency (Stretta) therapy improves quality of life and reduce proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependency in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study from a UK tertiary centre [J]. Frontline Gastroenterol, 2019, 10(2): 113-119.
19
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Update on Endoscopic Approaches for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), 2019, 15(7): 369-376.
20
Mermelstein J, Chait Mermelstein A, Chait MM. Proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: challenges and solutions [J]. Clin Exp Gastroenterol, 2018, 11: 119-134.
21
Gyawali CP, Roman S, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastroesophageal reflux disease: Conclusions from an international consensus group [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(12).
22
Roman S, Gyawali CP, Savarino E, et al. Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group [J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2017, 29(10): 1-15.
23
Yadlapati R, Tye M, Keefer L, et al. Psychosocial distress and quality of life impairment are associated with symptom severity in PPI non-responders with normal impedance-pH profiles [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017, 113(1): 31-38.
24
Hussain ZH, Henderson EE, Maradey-Romerao C, et al. The proton pump inhibitor non-responder: a clinical conundrum [J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2015, 6(10): e115.
25
Yadlapati R, Vaezi MF, Vela MF, et al. Management options for patients with GERD and persistent symptoms on proton pump inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2018, 113(7): 980-986.
26
Hillman L, Yadlapati R, Thuluvath AJ, et al. A review of medical therapy for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(9): 1-15.
27
Kurlander JE, Kennedy JK, Rubenstein JH, et al. Patients' perceptions of proton pump inhibitor risks and attempts at discontinuation: a national survey [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2019, 114(2): 244-249.
28
Makunts T, Cohen IV, Awdishu L, et al. Analysis of postmarketing safety data for proton-pump inhibitors reveals increased propensity for renal injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and nephrolithiasis [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 2282.
29
Subramanian CR, Triadafilopoulos G. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease [J]. Gastroenterol Rep, 2015, 3(1): 41-53.
30
Maret-Ouda J, Wahlin K, El-Serag HB, et al. Association between laparoscopic antireflux surgery and recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux [J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(10): 939-946.
31
Yadlapati R, Hungness ES, Pandolfino JE. Complications of antireflux surgery [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2018, 113(8): 1137-1147.
32
Nicolau AE, Lobonţiu A, Constantinoiu S. New Minimally Invasive Endoscopic and Surgical Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) [J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2018, 113(1): 70-82.
33
Funk LM, Kanji A, Scott Melvin W, et al. Elective antireflux surgery in the US: an analysis of national trends in utilization and inpatient outcomes from 2005 to 2010 [J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(5): 1712-1719.
34
Tebala GD. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Are we acting in the best interest of our patients [J]? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(21): 4553-4556.
35
Dughera L, Rotondano G, De Cento M, et al. Durability of Stretta radiofrequency treatment for GERD: results of an 8-year follow-up [J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2014: 531907.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[3] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[4] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[5] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[6] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[7] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[8] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[9] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[10] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[11] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[12] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[13] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[14] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
[15] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
阅读次数
全文


摘要